Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 3;15(3):e35733. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35733

Table 4. Post-hoc tests for Little's Irregularity Index and the intercanine width (at the cusp level) in the pairwise comparisons†.

† Bonferroni was used to detect any significant difference between every two groups, LII: Little's Irregularity Index, CWC: intercanine width at the cusps level, T1: after 1 month, T2: after 2 months, T3: after 3 months, T4: at the end of the leveling and alignment phase, Group 1: traditional brackets group, Group 2: self-ligating brackets group, Group 3: self-ligating brackets + flapless piezocision group; NS: there was no statistically significant difference at P > 0.05, *: statistically significant at P < 0.05, **: statistically significant at P < 0.01, ***: statistically significant at P < 0.001

Variable Time Group comparison Mean difference 95% CI for difference P-value Significance
        Lower bound Upper bound    
LII T1 Group 1 vs. Group 2 1.75 0.99 2.51 >0.001 ***
Group 1 vs. Group 3 3.15 2.39 3.91 >0.001 ***
Group 2 vs. Group 3 1.40 0.63 2.16 >0.001 ***
T2 Group 1 vs. Group 2 2.14 1.55 2.73 >0.001 ***
Group 1 vs. Group 3 4.31 3.72 4.90 >0.001 ***
Group 2 vs. Group 3 2.16 1.57 2.76 >0.001 ***
T3 Group 1 vs. Group 2 1.79 1.21 2.38 >0.001 ***
Group 1 vs. Group 3 4.02 3.44 4.61 >0.001 ***
Group 2 vs. Group 3 2.23 1.63 2.82 >0.001 ***
CWC T4 Group 1 vs. Group 2 1.15 0.10 2.21 0.027 *
Group 1 vs. Group 3 1.33 0.28 2.39 0.008 **
Group 2 vs. Group 3 0.17 -0.88 1.24 1.000 NS