Table 6.
Agreement in risk classification between (A) automatic, (B) manual and (c) visual assessment of LDCT scans and gold standard.
| (A) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Automatic LDCT | Agatston score measured on CSCT | ||||||
| 0 | 1–10 | 11–100 | 101–400 | 400–1 000 | > 1 000 | ||
| 0 | 12 | 9 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 39 (18.3%) |
| 1–10 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 (3.8%) |
| 11–100 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 16 | 7 | 0 | 29 (13.6%) |
| 101–400 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 49 | 9 | 72 (33.8%) |
| 401–1 000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 34 | 46 (21.6%) |
| > 1 000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 19 (8.9%) |
| 12 (5.6%) | 9 (4.2%) | 27 (12.7%) | 34 (16.0%) | 69 (32.4%) | 62 (29.1%) | 213 | |
| (B) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual LDCT | Agatston score measured on CSCT | ||||||
| 0 | 1–10 | 11–100 | 101–400 | 400–1 000 | > 1 000 | ||
| 0 | 12 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 (9.9%) |
| 1–10 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 17 (8.0%) |
| 11–100 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 18 | 4 | 0 | 34 (16.0%) |
| 101-400 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 49 | 4 | 67 (31.5%) |
| 401–1 000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 39 | 55 (25.8%) |
| > 1 000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 19 (8.9%) |
| 12 (5.6%) | 9 (4.2%) | 27 (12.7%) | 34 (16.0%) | 69 (32.4%) | 62 (29.1%) | 213 | |
| (C) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visual LDCT | Agatston score measured on CSCT | ||||||
| 0 | 1–10 | 11–100 | 101–400 | 400–1 000 | > 1 000 | ||
| 0 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 19 (8.9%) |
| 1–10 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 (4.2%) |
| 11–100 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 28 (13.1%) |
| 101–400 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 22 | 16 | 1 | 41 (19.2%) |
| 401–1 000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 53 | 14 | 69 (32.4%) |
| > 1 000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 47 | 47 (22.1%) |
| 12 (5.6%) | 9 (4.2%) | 27 (12.7%) | 34 (16.0%) | 69 (32.4%) | 62 (29.1%) | 213 | |
A: Weighted linear κ = 0.50 (95% CI 0.44–0.56)
B: Weighted linear κ = 0.58 (95% CI 0.52–0.63)
C: Weighted linear κ = 0.82 (95% CI 0.77–0.87)