Abstract
In this work, tin (IV) oxide (SnO2) nanoparticles were synthesized based on Amaranthus spinosus plant. The produced graphene oxide by a modified Hummers’ method was functionalized with melamine (mRGO) and used accompanied by natural bentonite (Bnt) and extracted chitosan from shrimp wastes to prepare Bnt-mRGO-CH. This was utilized as novel support for anchoring Pt and SnO2 nanoparticles to prepare the novel Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH catalyst. The crystalline structure, morphology and uniform dispersion of nanoparticles in the prepared catalyst were determined by TEM images and XRD technique. The electrocatalytic performance of the Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH catalyst was evaluated for methanol electro-oxidation through electrochemical investigations including cyclic voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, and chronoamperometry techniques. Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH showed enhanced catalytic activity compared to Pt/Bnt-mRGO-CH and Pt/Bnt-CH catalysts considering its higher electrochemically active surface area, higher mass activity, and better stability for methanol oxidation. SnO2/Bnt-mRGO and Bnt-mRGO nanocomposites were also synthesized and did not show any significant activity for methanol oxidation. The results showed that Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH could be a promising catalyst as anode material in direct methanol fuel cells.
Subject terms: Electrochemistry, Nanoscale materials
Introduction
Today, with the development of urbanization and industrialization of cities and the growing demand for energy as well as the environmental pollution of fossil fuels, the attention of scientists has been drawn to the search for clean and efficient energy sources1–3. Among the various energy sources, direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs) are of great attention due to their high energy density, easy storage and transportation of liquid fuel, low pollution emissions, and environmental compatibility4–6.
Platinum (Pt) is one of the efficient catalysts in direct methanol fuel cells, which has a good catalytic activity for methanol oxidation reaction (MOR). However, high cost, scarce natural reserve, strong affinity of Pt with carbon monoxide (CO) and poisoning with the adsorbed CO limit the use of Pt and its commercial application in fuel cells7–9. Therefore, one of the key challenges in DMFCs is to use new platinum-based catalysts with improved platinum catalytic activity and less carbon monoxide poisoning.
Several strategies have been applied to modify the usage of Pt catalyst in the fuel cells. The first strategy is to use other metals or metal oxides accompanied by Pt nanoparticles to enhance their catalytic performance for MOR10–14. Recent studies on metal oxides with great electrical conductivity property and an enormous number of oxygen vacancies have revealed that they might be a useful alternative for noble metals in fuel cells15–17. The use of metal oxides leads to improve alcohol oxidation and decreases the development of carbon monoxide (CO) through oxidizing carbon monoxide to carbon dioxide18. These features cause metal oxides to be applicable in direct alcohol fuel cells.
The second strategy is to increase the number of available active sites for MOR with the equal amounts of platinum loading. In order to increase the active surface and the presence of more platinum atoms on the catalysts' surface, the dispersion of nanoparticles should be improved and the size of platinum nanoparticles should be reduced. The use of appropriate supporting materials causes uniform dispersion of nanoparticles and prevents agglomeration of nanoparticles. Various support materials are used for dispersion of nanoparticles. Different carbon-based materials including carbon nanofibers, carbon nanotubes (CNTs), mesoporous carbon, graphene, Vulcan XC-72 carbon, and reduced graphene oxide (RGO) are used as supporting materials for Pt nanoparticles19–23. RGO is recognized as an appropriate supporting material due to its chemical stability, high charge mobility, great specific surface area, and excellent electronic conductivity One of the developing procedures to modify the reduced graphene oxide is functionalization of its surface which improves its stability and activity for nanoparticles24, 25.
Various polymers have been investigated as catalysts’ support in the fuel cells such as polyaniline, nafion, polypyrrole, polyvinyl alcohol, and chitosan26–29. Chitosan (CH) is a cheap, nontoxicity, renewable, numerous, and decomposable biopolymer with a robust dependency on metals that is formatted via the deacetylation of chitin30, 31. Chitosan has the amino (NH2) and OH functional groups in its structure, which cause this polymer to be a descent polymer electrolyte and an excellent catalysts’ support. The amino group in the structure of chitosan is easily protonated to produce NH3+ in acidic and neutral solutions5. Chitosan solution prepared through dissolving chitosan in 1% acetic acid aqueous solution and created an electrostatic attraction between PtCl62− and NH3+ with opposite charges.
In this work, RGO is functionalized with melamine to produce mRGO. Melamine (1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine) is a 6 nitrogen (N)-containing organic compounds with the chemical formula C3H6N632. Bentonite (Bnt) is also utilized as catalyst support accompanied by mRGO and CH because its surface and special structure are very appropriate for transition metals. This clay is a nontoxic, freely available, inexpensive, and abundant natural mineral33.
In this work, for the first time, we report the utilization of Bnt-mRGO-CH as new catalyst support for direct alcohol fuel cells (DAFCs). The melamine and chitosan polymer are miscible in each other. The conductivity of the polymer would be increased due to the creation of robust hydrogen bonding among the amino groups of melamine and the hydroxyl groups of chitosan. These two would help the improved dispersion of Pt nanoparticles through the creation of the robust electrostatic attractions among the positively charged functional groups in their structure with the negatively charged PtCl62−. Also, the catalysts’ thin layer can have better adherents in the presence of chitosan polymer on the surface of the working electrode. SnO2 nanoparticles were utilized with Pt nanoparticles to improve their catalytic performance for MOR. The catalytic performance of Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH nanocatalyst has been studied for methanol electro-oxidation in fuel cells through various electrochemical techniques including chronoamperometry, cyclic voltammetry, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS).
Experimental sections
Materials
Bentonite and Amaranthus spinosus were collected from Birjand, Iran. 3-aminopropyl triethoxy silane, ethanol, and SnCl2.2H2O were bought from Merck. Chitosan was extracted from shrimp wastes. Powdered graphite (99.5%), nitric acid, sulfuric acid (H2SO4 98%), hydrogen peroxide (30%), potassium permanganate (99%), hydrochloric acid (37%), sodium borohydride (96%), melamine, acetic acid (glacial, 100%), hexachloroplatinic acid, methanol (CH3OH 99.2%) were purchased from Merck.
Synthesis of aminated bentonite
3 gr of bentonite was sonicated in 30 ml of ethanol. Then 5 mmol of 3-aminopropyl triethoxy silane was added and stirred within 24 h. The obtained aminated bentonite was filtered and washed with ethanol for three times.
Synthesis of graphene oxide (GO)
Graphene oxide was obtained by a modified Hummers’ method from powdered graphite34. Briefly, sulfuric acid and nitric acids with the volume ratio of 3:1 and 2.5 g graphite powder were mixed by stirring for 24 h. the excess acids were removed by centrifuge. After drying, 25 ml acetone was added to the dried mixture using an ultrasonic bath for 30 min. After drying the mixture, 115 ml sulfuric was slowly added to the beaker under magnetic stirring. Afterwards, 15 g potassium permanganate was slowly added to the suspension in an ice bath. Following by the slowly addition of deionized water, the suspension was treated with 50 ml hydrogen peroxide. The product was centrifuged with hydrochloric acid 5% and washed with deionized water. The dried product was utilized as GO.
Synthesis of melamine-RGO (mRGO)
To prepare melamine-RGO, 2 mg of graphene oxide was first mixed with 100 ml of deionized water and sonicated for 1 h. 10 mg of melamine was dissolved separately in 20 ml of deionized water and added to the first suspension and kept sonicating for another 1 h. Then, 30 μl of formaldehyde was poured into the mixture. While magnetic stirring, the NaOH solution was added drop by drop until the pH of the solution reached 9. The balloon lid was then closed and placed in a 70 °C water bath for 3 h. After that, 5–6 drops of APS liquid were added and the mixture was placed in a 70 °C water bath for another 3 h. After centrifuging, washing and drying the product, melamine reduced graphene oxide was prepared.
Synthesis of bentonite-mRGO (Bnt-mRGO) nanocomposite
To prepare Bnt-mRGO nanocomposite, 3 gr of the aminated bentonite and 3 gr of mRGO were dispersed in 50 ml of water and refluxed within 5 h at 80 °C.
Biosynthesis of SnO2 nanoparticles
The aqueous extract of Amaranthus spinosus (100 ml) was added dropwise to SnCl2.2H2O (25 ml, 0.05 M) with constant stirring at room temperature for 30 min. After 5 min, the solution color was changed from white to brown indicating the formation of the desired nanoparticles. Stirring of the solution was continued for another 30 min at 75 °C and after that, the obtained solution was cooled and centrifuged at 5000 rpm. The resultant precipitates were washed several times with double distilled water and dried at room temperature. The obtained nanoparticles were grounded using an agate mortar and then placed inside the furnace at 550 °C for 3 h. The SnO2 nanoparticles were obtained as a beige powder.
Synthesis of SnO2/Bnt-mRGO nanocomposite
To prepare SnO2/Bnt-mRGO nanocomposite, 2 gr of Bnt-mRGO and 2 gr of SnO2 nanoparticles were added to 30 ml of deionized water and refluxed within 6 h. The obtained nanocomposite was washed three times with double distilled water.
Synthesis of Pt-based catalysts
Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH catalyst was synthesized with a simple procedure as follows: 1 mg Bnt-mRGO and 2 mg of SnO2 nanoparticles were uniformly dispersed in deionized water and chitosan (Volumetric ratio: 17.5/2.5) after sonication for 1 h. 25 µl H2PtCl6 (1 M) was poured into the mixture and vigorously stirred for 1 h. Afterwards, 50 µl aqueous solution of NaBH4 (3 M) was quickly injected to the suspension, while kept stirring for another 24 h. The resulting black suspension was centrifuged and washed several times with deionized water for purification. Finally, the product was dried at 50 °C for 12 h and the Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH catalyst was obtained. Pt/Bnt-mRGO-CH catalysts were synthesized by the identical procedure without using the tin oxide nanoparticles. Bnt-CH support was subjected to the same procedure to obtain Pt/Bnt-CH catalyst.
Physical characterization
The synthesized GO was characterized by X-ray diffraction instrument (XRD, Philips PC-APD apparatus equipped with a graphite monochromatic CuKa radiation source). The morphological and structural information of the catalysts were obtained by XRD and transmission electron microscope (TEM, Philips CM120) images. The prepared support materials were analyzed by Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrophotometer (Brucker, TENSOR 27). The amount of Pt nanoparticles, loaded in the catalysts, was determined by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES, Shimadzu ICPE-9800).
Electrochemical measurements
A uniform catalyst ink was obtained by dispersing 2 mg of catalyst powder in 1 ml of chitosan solution, followed by ultrasonic treatment for 15 min. Then, a uniform thin catalyst film was obtained by dropping 5 μl of the catalyst ink onto the surface of glass carbon (GC) electrode with 2 mm diameter and drying for overnight.
A potentiostat/galvanostat Autolab apparatus (Nova software, model PGSTAT 302N, Metrohm, Netherlands) with a classical three-electrode cell was utilized to perform the electrochemical investigations of the catalysts. A saturated calomel electrode (SCE) was served as reference electrode. The platinum and GC electrodes were employed as auxiliary and working electrodes, respectively. The amount of Pt nanoparticles on the surface of the modified GC electrodes, assessed by ICP-OES, was determined to be 3.134 μg for the synthesized catalysts.
Results and discussion
Material characterization
FT-IR spectroscopy is a power full technique to characterize the presence of different functional groups in chemical materials. FT-IR spectra of GO, melamine and mRGO are shown in Fig. 1A. In the FT-IR spectrum of melamine, the absorption peaks at 3362.13 cm−1 are assigned to –NH2 stretching vibration; whereas those at 1576 cm−1 and 956 cm−1 are assigned to the triazine ring. The stretching (N–)–C = O peak at 1666 cm−1 may overlap by ring C = N, ring C–N stretching (1554 cm−1) and carbonyl (C = O) for ketone at (1718 cm−1). The ring C–N bending (814 cm−1), stretching C–N (1144 cm−1), C–C (1479 cm−1), and stretching C–O (1402 cm−1) peaks show the successful functionalization process35, 36. In FT-IR spectrum of RGO, the deformation of water molecules at 1636 cm−1 was observed. Further the bands at 1586 cm−1 corresponds to C = C in-plane vibrations and 664 cm−1 is corresponding to –CH out-of-plane vibrations. A broad peak at 3400 cm−1 can be assigned to the vibrations of the adsorbed water molecules or may also contain skeletal vibrations corresponding to unoxidized graphitic domains. The spectrum does not contain any peaks associated with C–OH (~ 1340 cm−1), C = C (~ 1570 cm−1), and –COOH (~ 1710–1720 cm−1) groups. The C = C bonds missing indicates a strong oxidation to have taken place37–39.
Figure 1.
(A) FTIR spectra of melamine, RGO and mRGO. (B) XRD pattern of Pt/Bnt-mRGO-CH and (C) XRD pattern of Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH catalyst.
XRD patterns of Pt/Bnt-mRGO-CH and Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH catalysts are shown in Fig. 1B and C, respectively. In XRD pattern of Pt/Bnt-mRGO-CH, the main constituents of bentonite are montmorillonite, quartz and feldspar which their diffraction patterns are completely shown in Fig. 1B. The diffraction peak, located at 2θ = 35.92° corresponds to (006) plane of montmorillonite40. The XRD peaks positioned at 2θ = 21.94°, 28.41° and 35.92° are relevant to (101), (111) and (102) planes of cristobalite, respectively. The presence of quartz is also indicated by a peak at 2θ = 26.53° (011). Furthermore, the diffraction peaks of Pt nanoparticles are observed at 39.84, 46.74 and 67.38 which are corresponded to the (111), (200) and (220) planes of Pt, respectively5. RGO usually shows a very broad weak diffraction peak at 2θ = 24° (002) due to the lack of crystallinity of graphene. In the XRD pattern of Pt/Bnt-mRGO-CH, (002) usually does not appear because the diffraction peaks of bentonite nanocrystals are much stronger than the (002) of RGO41. In XRD pattern of Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH, the observed peaks at 2θ = 26.48, 33.52, 37.80, and 51.64 correspond to the (1 1 0), (1 0 1), (2 0 0), and (2 1 1) planes of SnO2 nanoparticles, respectively. The XRD pattern of the synthesized nanoparticles exactly matches with the tetragonal rutile structure of SnO2 nanoparticles (JCPDS 77-0448)42.
TEM images of Pt/Bnt-mRGO-CH and Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH nanocatalysts are shown in Fig. 2A–C, respectively. The presence of platinum and tin oxide nanoparticles, dispersed in the Bnt-mRGO-CH substrate, is clearly observed. Platinum nanoparticles are uniformly dispersed in Bnt-mRGO-CH substrate and around tin oxide nanoparticles. The average size of the spherical platinum particles is about 5 nm and tin nanoparticles are about 40 nm.
Figure 2.
TEM images of (A), (B) Pt/Bnt-mRGO-CH and (C) Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH nanocatalysts.
Electrocatalytic studies
Hydrogen adsorption and desorption
To evaluate the number of effective catalytic sites of the Pt-based catalysts for MOR, electrochemically active surface area (EASA) of the synthesized catalysts was determined. For this purpose, the cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of the catalysts were obtained in sulfuric acid solution (0.5 M) in the potential range from − 0.35 to 1.2 V and scan rate of 100 mV s−1 (Fig. 3A). All the synthesized catalysts showed two pronounced peaks in the potential range between − 300 mV to 100 mV which are attributed to the hydrogen desorption and absorption on the Pt surface. EASA was obtained by integrating the hydrogen desorption and adsorption regions according to the following equation43:
| 1 |
Figure 3.
(A) Cyclic voltammograms and (B) EASA values of the catalysts in 0.5 M H2SO4.
QH (mC cm−2) is the mean charge value passed during hydrogen adsorption and desorption, 0.21 is the constant value which is related to the charge, required for oxidizing one monolayer of hydrogen on the Pt nanoparticles’ surface. [Pt] (mg cm−2) is the amount of platinum, loaded on the surface of modified working electrode25. As calculated, the EASA value of Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH catalyst was 143.182 m2 g−1Pt, which was the maximal value relative to Pt/Bnt-mRGO-CH (138.502 m2 g−1Pt) and Pt/Bnt-CH (133.41 m2 g−1Pt) catalysts (Fig. 3B). With the same amount of Pt loading, the higher EASA value of Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH, compared to Pt/Bnt-mRGO-CH and Pt/Bnt-CH catalysts reveals its higher accessible active sites for methanol oxidation44. The higher EASA value of Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH, compared to the other two catalysts is probably due to the better dispersion of Pt nanoparticles in this catalyst. As shown in the TEM images of Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH, Pt nanoparticles are dispersed in the matrix of Bnt-mRGO-CH support and around SnO2 nanoparticles. In addition, the presence of hydroxyl-rich species produced from water dissociation on the surface of tin oxide nanoparticles facilitates the removal of hydrogen, adsorbed during the hydrogen oxidation reaction, and enhances the hydrogen oxidation reaction45. The dispersion of Pt nanoparticles in the synthesized Pt-based catalysts can be determined from the EASA values according to the following equation46:
| 2 |
where, MPt and rPt are the relative molecular weight (195.08 g/mol) and the atomic ratio (0.139 nm) of Pt, respectively. NA is related to the Avogadro number (6.02 × 1023). DPt values of Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH, Pt/Bnt-mRGO-CH, and Pt/Bnt-CH catalysts were obtained as 0.191, 0.185, and 0.178, respectively. As shown, the presence of mRGO accompanied by Bnt-CH and also the presence of SnO2 nanoparticles improve the dispersion of Pt nanoparticles on the electrode surface.
Electrochemical activity for methanol oxidation reaction (MOR)
The evaluation of the electrochemical performance of Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH, Pt/Bnt-mRGO-CH and Pt/Bnt-CH nanocatalysts for MOR was conducted in an aqueous mixed solution of sulfuric acid (0.5 M) and methanol (0.72 M) (Fig. 4A,B). All the CV curves displayed two intense peaks for MOR. The first peak in the forward scan (jf) belongs to the methanol electro-oxidation and the second one in the backward scan (jb) is attributed to the oxidation of the accumulated intermediates, formed during the forward scan47.
Figure 4.
(A) The mass activity, (B) the specific activity and (C) the chronoamperometric curves of the catalysts in sulfuric acid 0.5 M and methanol 0.72 M. (D) the retained mass activity and activity decline ratio of the catalysts after 1000 s.
Insights into catalytic activity of the synthesized catalysts for MOR are obtained by comparing their anodic peak current and potential, and onset potential for methanol electro-oxidation. The mass activity of the prepared catalysts was obtained from the current normalized by the mass of loaded platinum on the surface of modified working electrodes. As clearly shown in Fig. 4A, Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH has improved electrocatalytic activity, compared to Pt/Bnt-mRGO-CH and Pt/Bnt-CH catalysts for MOR.
The onset potential of MOR for Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH catalyst was at 0.18 V whereas, for Pt/Bnt-mRGO-CH and Pt/Bnt-CH catalysts were at 0.236 V and 0.322 V, respectively. The onset potential of MOR at the prepared catalysts is related to the breaking of carbon-hydrogen bonds and removal of the absorbed carbon monoxide species48. The more negative onset potential of Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH for methanol oxidation, compared to the other two catalysts is probably due to the presence of tin oxide nanoparticles, which facilitates the removal of adsorbed carbon monoxide from the catalyst surface49.
The normalized anodic peak mass activity of MOR on the surface of Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH catalyst was 4986.615 mA mg−1Pt, which was higher than that of Pt/Bnt-mRGO-CH (4189.107 mA mg−1Pt) and Pt/Bnt-CH (4316.67 mA mg−1Pt) catalysts. The mass activity ratio of the anodic peak in the forward scan to the backward scan (jf/jb) can be used to compare the catalytic performance of the synthesized catalysts for MOR. This ratio can be utilized to determine the tolerance of the prepared catalysts to carbon monoxide species, produced during methanol electro-oxidation. The larger values of jf/jb indicate that the synthesized catalysts have better resistance to carbon monoxide poisoning50. The jf/jb value for Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH catalyst was 1.33, while this ratio for Pt/Bnt-mRGO-CH and Pt/Bnt-CH catalysts was 1.31 and 1.17, respectively. The higher jf/jb ratio for Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH catalyst indicates its enhanced catalytic performance for MOR, compared to the other two catalysts. In fact, incorporating SnO2 nanoparticles in bentonite-melamine graphene oxide-chitosan substrate and using them together with platinum nanoparticles increases the catalytic performance of platinum for MOR. This is related to the presence of SnO2 nanoparticles, which facilitate methanol electro-oxidation by producing more hydroxyl groups. The mechanism of methanol oxidation on the surface of Pt-SnO2 nanoparticles is considered as follows16, 51:
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 7 |
At first, methanol is adsorbed and dehydrogenated on the Pt nanoparticles’ surface. Pt nanoparticles are poisoned by the adsorbed carbon monoxide (CO) species on their surface. Methanol oxidation is prevented on the surface of the poisoned Pt nanoparticles. In order to oxidize CO intermediates to CO2, the adsorbate should react with such oxygen-containing species as OHads and H2O in the aqueous solution. The presence of SnO2 nanoparticles, accompanied by Pt nanoparticles, can accelerate the production of hydroxyl species. These hydroxyl species can facilitate oxidation and removal of the adsorbed CO from the surface of Pt nanoparticles, and thus prevent poisoning of Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH catalyst with CO52, 53.
The specific activity, normalized to the EASA values, is also calculated to evaluate the intrinsic activity of the catalysts (Fig. 4B)54. As expected, the highest specific activity is observed on Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH (3.483 mA cm−2), which is higher than that of Pt/Bnt-mRGO-CH (3.024 mA cm−2) and Pt/Bnt-CH (3.235 mA cm−2) catalysts. This result confirmed the enhanced activity of Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH for MOR among all the examined catalysts.
Chitosan and melamine reduced graphene oxide have NH2 and OH functional groups in their structures. These functional groups are positively charged in an acidic environment. A more uniform dispersion of Pt nanoparticles and their better catalytic performance for MOR were obtained due to the electrostatic attraction between the positively charged functional groups and PtCl62- with negative charge55. In addition, the presence of chitosan causes better adhesion of the catalyst layer to the electrode surface. The large surface area, mechanical properties, high thermal stability and other unique properties of bentonite have led to its wide use in adsorbents and composites56. In green chemical processes, bentonite has a very high potential to absorb palladium and platinum on its surface and create a stable composite57.
The catalytic activity of the prepared catalysts was compared with that of other catalysts and the commercial Pt/C, mentioned in the literature16, 18, 44, 51, 58–66. As shown in Table 1, Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH has higher catalytic activity than other catalysts towards methanol oxidation according to its higher EASA and higher anodic mass activity. Higher mass activity of Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH catalyst, compared to that of the other mentioned catalysts, is probably due to the small size of nanoparticles, their homogeneous and uniform distribution on the Bnt-mRGO-CH support and the presence of SnO2 nanoparticles, accompanied by Pt nanoparticles for methanol oxidation16, 60.
Table 1.
Electrochemical data of methanol electro-oxidation at various catalysts.
| Catalysts | EASA (m2 g−1Pt) | Ef (V) vs. SCE | jf (mA mg−1Pt) | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pt/PVA-CuO-Co3O4/CH | 54.56 | 0.810 | 3010.868 | 16 |
| Pt/PVA-CuO-Co3O4 | 35.89 | 0.744 | 1597.984 | 16 |
| Pt/LP-TiO2/CFP | 230.04 | 0.7 | 1182.8 | 51 |
| PtPdCr/C | 65 | 0.69 | 969 | 58 |
| Pt-Pb HAc/C | 10.53 | 0.98 RHE | 1000 | 59 |
| GCE/PBCB/Pt-Ru | 302.8 | 0.69 Ag/AgCl | 898.6 | 60 |
| Pt-C/Fe2-CoP | 117.34 | 0.7 | 1237 | 44 |
| Pt-FeNi2P/C | 90.47 | 0.641 | 1125 | 61 |
| Pt/C-Au@CeO2-Pt | 77.8 | 0.8 | 1267 | 18 |
| Commercial Pt/C | 45.6 | 0.7 | 616 | 18 |
| Commercial Pt/C | 74.62 | 0.7 | 470 | 62 |
| Commercial Pt/C (20% Pt) | 65.7 | 0.65 | 258.5 | 63 |
| Pt NPs/C | 22 | 0.65 | 153.8 | 64 |
| Pt NWs/NL-CNS | 115.9 | 0.7 | 1949.5 | 64 |
| Pt/C (C:Vulcan carbon) | 39.67 | 0.62 | 192.97 | 65 |
| Pt/OMCS (ordered mesoporous carbon sphere) | 73.5 | 0.9 vs. NHE | 510 | 66 |
| Pt/Bnt-CH | 133.41 | 0.854 | 4316.67 | This work |
| Pt/Bnt-mRGO-CH | 138.502 | 0.891 | 4189.107 | This work |
| Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH | 143.182 | 0.942 | 4986.615 | This work |
The electrochemical stability of the synthesized catalysts was evaluated using chronoamperometric curves at 0.85 V for 1000 s in 0.5 M H2SO4 and 0.72 M methanol solutions (Fig. 4C). As can be seen, the activities of the prepared catalysts decrease rapidly in the initial stage due to the poisoning of platinum nanoparticles with the adsorbed chemical species such as carbon monoxide, formed during methanol electro-oxidation67–69.
The Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH catalyst has the highest initial mass activity and the lowest mass activity loss after 1000 s, compared to the other two catalysts. After 1000 s, Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH (659.637 mA mg−1Pt) showed the highest residual mass activity, compared to the Pt/Bnt-mRGO-CH (346.812 mA mg−1Pt) and Pt/Bnt-CH (249.932 mA mg−1Pt) catalysts (Fig. 4D). The chronoamperometric results showed that Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH catalyst has better stability and catalytic performance for methanol electro-oxidation, compared to the other two catalysts.
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is utilized to evaluate the electrode kinetics under MOR. As shown in Fig. 5A, all the synthesized catalysts exhibit the typical Nyquist plots. The Nyquist plots were obtained in the range of 1 × 104 to 10−2 Hz at open circuit potential (OCP) in 0.5 M H2SO4 and 0.72 M methanol. All the Nyquist plots showed a small semicircle in high frequency region and a line in the low-frequency region70. The diameter of the Nyquist plots semicircle, in the high frequency range, is related to the charge-transfer resistance during MOR. The smaller semicircles’ diameter of Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH signifies its faster catalytic kinetic rate for MOR, compared to the other two catalysts.
Figure 5.
(A) Nyquist plots of the catalysts for MOR in 0.5 M H2SO4 and 0.72 M methanol, CV curves on (B) Pt/Bnt-CH, (C) Pt/Bnt-mRGO-CH and (D) Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH in 0.5 M H2SO4 and different concentration of methanol 0.08, 0.16, 0.24, 0.32, 0.41, 0.48, 0.56, 0.64 and 0.72 M.
The effects of different methanol concentrations on the anodic mass activity of methanol electro-oxidation at Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH, Pt/Bnt-mRGO-CH and Pt/Bnt-CH catalysts are represented in Fig. 5. As shown, the anodic mass activity of MOR at the prepared catalysts increases with the increase in methanol concentration up to 0.72 M. At higher methanol concentration, the anodic mass activity of MOR does not change with the increase of methanol concentration, and this is probably due to the saturation of the active sites on the surface of the electrodes71. In addition, with increase in methanol concentration, the anodic potential of methanol oxidation shifts to more positive potentials. This is probably due to the enhanced poisoning of platinum nanoparticles72. For Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH (Fig. 5D), with increasing the methanol concentration from 0.08 M to 0.72 M, the anodic mass activity of methanol oxidation increases from 1731.147 to 4986.615 mA mg−1 Pt. While for Pt/Bnt-mRGO-CH (Fig. 5C) and Pt/Bnt-CH (Fig. 5B) catalysts with increasing the methanol concentration from 0.08 M to 0.72 M, the anodic mass activity of MOR increases from 2203.615 to 4189.107 mA mg−1Pt and from 715.031 to 4316.67 mA mg−1Pt, respectively.
The long-term stability of the synthesized catalysts for MOR was evaluated by cyclic voltammetry technique with 100 consecutive cycles (Fig. 6). The CV curves were obtained in 0.5 M sulfuric acid and 0.72 M methanol at the scan rate of 100 mV s−1. As shown, the anodic mass activity of MOR for all the catalysts continuously decreased during 100 cycles. This is due to the poisoning of the catalysts with the produced carbon monoxide species73. For the Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH catalyst, the anodic mass activity of MOR decreased by 40.52% after 100 cycles, while for Pt/Bnt-mRGO-CH and Pt/Bnt-CH catalysts, the anodic mass activity for MOR decreased by 54.02 and 46.30%, respectively after 100 cycles. Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH catalyst showed the best stability for methanol oxidation during 100 consecutive cycles, compared to other prepared catalysts.
Figure 6.
CV curves of the prepared catalysts during 100 cycles in 0.5 M H2SO4 and 0.72 M methanol solution.
The catalytic performance of Pt/Bnt-CH, Pt/Bnt-mRGO-CH, and Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH catalysts were investigated for methanol electro-oxidation at different scan rates of 30, 60, 90, 100, 130, 160, and 190 mV s−1 in the solution containing H2SO4 0.5 M and methanol 0.72 M (Fig. 7). As shown, the anodic peak mass activity of methanol oxidation increases with increasing the scan rate. For each catalyst, the plots of anodic peak mass activity of MOR (j) versus the square root of scan rate (ʋ0.5) and the plots of anodic peak potential of MOR (E) versus ln ʋ are shown in the inset of each Fig. The linear relationship between j and ʋ0.5 for each catalyst reveals that methanol oxidation is controlled by diffusion of methanol from the solution to the surface of electrode74. The linear relationship between E and ln ʋ for each catalyst shows the irreversibility of charge transfer process for methanol electro-oxidation71.
Figure 7.
CV curves of the prepared catalysts in 0.5 M H2SO4 and 0.72 M methanol at different scan rates of 30, 60, 90, 100, 130, 160, and 190 mV s−1.
Conclusions
In summary, the novel Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH nanocatalyst was synthesized, using the novel Bnt-mRGO-CH support for uniformly dispersion of nanoparticles. The as-prepared catalyst exhibited excellent catalytic activity for methanol electro-oxidation, compared to Pt/Bnt-CH and Pt/Bnt-mRGO-CH catalysts. It was found that the use of SnO2 nanoparticles accompanied by Pt nanoparticles and their uniform dispersion on Bnt-mRGO-CH support improved the catalytic performance of Pt catalyst for MOR by creating more available active sites for methanol electro-oxidation. Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH exhibited enhanced catalytic performance for MOR compared to Pt/Bnt-mRGO-CH and Pt/Bnt-CH nanocatalysts, due to its higher electrochemically active surface area, better stability, and higher anodic mass activity. By and large, it was demonstrated that Pt-SnO2/Bnt-mRGO-CH is a promising catalyst for MOR. Undoubtedly, this research is of great significance for the development of novel and efficient catalysts for methanol oxidation in direct methanol fuel cells.
Acknowledgements
We would like to say special thanks to University of Birjand, Esfarayen University of Technology, and University of Jiroft for financial support and providing all facilities to perform this research.
Author contributions
A.N. synthesized and characterization of the nanocomposite and wrote this part. M.S.E.K. worked on electrocatalytic applications of this nanocomposite and answered to reviewers. A.A wrote other part of paper.
Data availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Song Y, Jamal R, Abdiryim T, Abdurexit A, Xie S, Liu L, Niyaz M, Serkjan N, Zhang Y. Nickel coating on carbon nanotubes and PProDOT-2CH2SH supported Pt nanoparticles as the electrocatalyst for methanol oxidation reaction. J. Alloys Compd. 2023;937:168343. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.168343. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zhou S, Wang Z, Liao W, Wang Y, Lin Q, Cao J, Wang Q. Thermally driven interfacial diffusion synthesis of composition-controllable Pt-Pb bimetallic nanoparticles boosts oxygen reduction and methanol oxidation electrocatalysis. Renew. Energy. 2022;182:627–633. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ekrami-Kakhki MS, Yavari Z, Saffari J, Abbasi S. Fabrication and evaluation of Pt/M (M = Co, Fe) chitosan supported catalysts for methanol electrooxidation: application in direct alcohol fuel cell. J. Nanostruct. 2016;6:221–234. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mondal S, Malik S. Easy synthesis approach of Pt nanoparticles on polyaniline surface: An efficient electrocatalyst for methanol oxidation reaction. J Power Sources. 2016;328:271–279. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.08.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Naeimi A, Ekrami-Kakhki MS, Donyagard F. Enhanced electrocatalytic performance of Pt nanoparticles immobilized on novel electrospun PVA@Ni/NiO/Cu complex bio-nanofiber/chitosan based on Calotropis procera plant for methanol electro-oxidation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2021;36:18949–18963. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chang X, Dong F, Yang S, Tang Z, Zha F. Well dispersed Pt nanoparticles on commercial carbon black oxidized by ozone possess significantly high electro-catalytic activity for methanol oxidation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2019;44:21559–21568. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.06.084. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yue X, Pu Y, Zhang W, Zhang T, Gao W. Ultrafine Pt nanoparticles supported on double-shelled C/TiO2 hollow spheres material as highly efficient methanol oxidation catalysts. J. Energy Chem. 2020;49:275–282. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2020.02.045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hu C, Zhou Y, Xiao M, Yu G. Precise size and dominant-facet control of ultra-small Pt nanoparticles for efficient ethylene glycol, methanol and ethanol oxidation electrocatalysts. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2020;45:4341–4354. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.11.176. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Noroozifar M, Khorasani-Motlagh M, Ekrami-Kakhki MS, Khaleghian-Moghadam R. Enhanced electrocatalytic properties of Pt-chitosan nanocomposite for direct methanol fuel cell by LaFeO3 and carbon nanotube. J. Power Sources. 2014;248:130–139. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.091. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Matin MA, Saleh Saad MAH, Kumar A, Al-Marri MJ, Mansour SA. Effect of fuel content on the electrocatalytic methanol oxidation performance of Pt/ZnO nanoparticles synthesized by solution combustion. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019;492:73–81. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.213. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhang X, Yan R, Zhou W, Zhou S. Pt–Ru bimetallic nanoparticles anchored on carbon nanotubes/polyaniline composites with coral-like structure for enhanced methanol oxidation. J. Alloy. Compd. 2022;920:165990. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165990. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Radzi Hanifah MF, Jaafar J, Othman MHD, Ismail AF, Rahman MA, Yusof N, Aziz F, Rahman NAA. One-pot synthesis of efficient reduced graphene oxide supported binary Pt-Pd alloy nanoparticles as superior electro-catalyst and its electro-catalytic performance toward methanol electro-oxidation reaction in direct methanol fuel cell. J. Alloy. Compd. 2019;793:232–246. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.04.114. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cao R, Xia T, Zhu R, Liu Z, Guo J, Chang G, et al. Novel synthesis of core-shell Au-Pt dendritic nanoparticles supported on carbon black for enhanced methanol electrooxidation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018;433:840–846. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.10.104. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ting CC, Chao CH, Yu Tsai C, Cheng IK, Pan FM. Electrocatalytic performance of Pt nanoparticles sputter-deposited on indium tin oxide toward methanol oxidation reaction: The particle size effect. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017;416:365–370. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.04.156. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ekrami-Kakhki MS, Pouyamanesh S, Abbasi S, Heidari G, Beitollahi H. Enhanced electrocatalytic performance of Pt nanoparticles incorporated CeO2 nanorods on polyaniline-chitosan support for methanol electrooxidation (experimental and statistical analysis) J. Cluster Sci. 2021;32:363–378. doi: 10.1007/s10876-020-01795-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ekrami-Kakhki MS, Naeimi A, Donyagard F. Pt nanoparticles supported on a novel electrospun polyvinyl alcohol-CuO-Co3O4/chitosan based on Sesbania sesban plant as an electrocatalyst for direct methanol fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2019;44:1671–1685. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.11.102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Liu YT, Yuan QB, Duan DH, Zhang ZL, Hao XG, Wei GQ, Liu SB. Electrochemical activity and stability of core–shell Fe2O3/Pt nanoparticles for methanol oxidation. J. Power Sources. 2013;243:622–629. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.06.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dao DV, Adilbish G, Le TD, Nguyen TTD, Lee IH, Yu YT. Au@CeO2 nanoparticles supported Pt/C electrocatalyst to improve the removal of CO in methanol oxidation reaction. J. Catal. 2019;377:589–599. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2019.07.054. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Li L, Qian Y, Yang J, Tan X, Dai Z, Jin Y, Wang H, Qu W, Chu Y. A novel structural design of hybrid nanotube with CNTs and CeO2 supported Pt nanoparticles with improved performance for methanol electro-oxidation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2016;41:9284–9294. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.04.069. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kakaei K. One-pot electrochemical synthesis of graphene by the exfoliation of graphite powder in sodium dodecyl sulfate and its decoration with platinum nanoparticles for methanol oxidation. Carbon. 2013;51:195–201. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.08.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Du M, Chen B, Hu Y, Chen J, Nie J, Ma G. Pt-based alloy nanoparticles embedded electrospun porous carbon nanofibers as electrocatalysts for Methanol oxidation reaction. J. Alloy. Compd. 2018;747:978–988. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sun H, Ma Z, Sui S, Zhao Y, Ren X, Ni G. Low-temperature plasma modified Vulcan XC72R as a support to enhance the methanol oxidation performance of Pt nanoparticles. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2022;47:31638–31646. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.07.092. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Maya-Cornejo J, Garcia-Bernabe A, Compan V. Bimetallic PtM electrocatalysts supported on single-wall carbon nanotubes for hydrogen and methanol electrooxidation in fuel cells applications. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2018;43:872–884. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.10.097. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ekrami-Kakhki MS, Farzaneh N, Fathi E. Superior electrocatalytic activity of Pt-SrCoO3-δ nanoparticles supported on functionalized reduced graphene oxide-chitosan for ethanol oxidation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2017;42:21131–21145. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.06.053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ekrami-Kakhki MS, Farzaneh N, Abbasi S, Makiabadi B. Electrocatalytic activity of Pt nanoparticles supported on novel functionalized reduced graphene oxide-chitosan for methanol electrooxidation. J. Mater. Sci. 2017;28:12373–12382. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhao H, Yang J, Li L, Li H, Wang J, Zhang Y. Effect of over-oxidation treatment of Pt-Co/polypyrrole-carbon nanotube catalysts on methanol oxidation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2009;34:3908–3914. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.02.079. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kakati N, Maiti J, Das G, Lee SH, Yoon YS. An approach of balancing the ionic conductivity and mechanical properties of PVA based nanocomposite membrane for DMFC by various crosslinking agents with ionic liquid. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2015;40:7114–7123. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.04.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Garcıa-Cruz L, Casado-Coterillo C, Iniesta J, Montiel V, Irabien A. Chitosan: poly (vinyl) alcohol composite alkaline membrane incorporating organic ionomers and layered silicate materials into a PEM electrochemical reactor. J. Membr. Sci. 2016;498:395–407. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.08.040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Guibal E. Heterogeneous catalysis on chitosan-based materials: A review. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2005;30:71–109. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2004.12.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ekrami-Kakhki MS, Khorasani-Motlagh M, Noroozifar M. Platinum nanoparticles self-assembled onto chitosan membrane as anode for direct methanol fuel cell. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2011;41:527–534. doi: 10.1007/s10800-011-0273-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hefnawy MA, Medany SS, El-Sherif RM, Fadlallah SA. Green synthesis of NiO/Fe3O4@chitosan composite catalyst based on graphite for urea electro-oxidation. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2022;290:126603. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.126603. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Dorne JL, Doerge DR, Vandenbroeck M, Fink-Gremmels J, Mennes W, Knutsen HK, Vernazza F, Castle L, Edler L, Benford D. Recent advances in the risk assessment of melamine and cyanuric acid in animal feed. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2013;270:218–229. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2012.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bananezhad B, Islami MR, Ghonchepour E, Mostafavi H, Momeni Tikdari A, Rafiei HR. Bentonite clay as an efficient substrate for the synthesis of the super stable and recoverable magnetic nanocomposite of palladium (Fe3O4/Bentonite-Pd) Polyhedron. 2019;162:192–200. doi: 10.1016/j.poly.2019.01.054. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chen J, Yao B, Li C, Shi G. An improved Hummers method for eco-friendly synthesis of graphene oxide. Carbon. 2013;64:225–229. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.07.055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhua H, Xu S. Preparation and fire behavior of rigid polyurethane foams synthesized from modified urea–melamine– formaldehyde resins. RSC Adv. 2018;32:17879. doi: 10.1039/C8RA01846D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Boorboor Ajdari F, Kowsari E, Ehsani A, Chepyga L, Schirowski M, Jäger S, Kasian O, Hauke F, Ameri T. Melamine-functionalized graphene oxide: Synthesis, characterization and considering as pseudocapacitor electrode material with intermixed POAP polymer. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018;459:874–883. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.07.215. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Pai AR, Nair B. Synthesis of reduced graphene oxide using novel exfoliation technique and its characterizations. J. Nano Electron. Phys. 2013;5:02032. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Dreyer DR, Murali S, Zhu Y, Ruoff RS, Bielawski CW. Reduction of graphite oxide using alcohols. J. Mater. Chem. 2011;21:3443. doi: 10.1039/C0JM02704A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Titelman GI, Gelman V, Bron S, Khalfin RL, Cohen Y, Bianco-Peled H. Characteristics and microstructure of aqueous colloidal dispersions of graphite oxide. Carbon. 2005;43:641–649. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2004.10.035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Naeimi A, Honarmand M, Chaji MA, Khosravi S. Green synthesis of bentonite/cellulose@lead oxide bio-nanocomposite with assistance of Pistacia Atlantica extract for efficient photocatalytic degradation of ciprofloxacin. Adv. Powder Technol. 2022;33:103441. doi: 10.1016/j.apt.2022.103441. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Abdel-Aal SK, Beskrovnyi AI, Ionov AM, Mozhchil RN, Abdel-Rahman AS. Structure investigation by neutron diffraction and X-Ray diffraction of graphene nanocomposite CuO-rGO prepared by low-cost method. Phys. Status Solidi A. 2021;218:2100138. doi: 10.1002/pssa.202100138. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Honarmand M, Golmohammadi M, Naeimi A. Biosynthesis of tin oxide (SnO2) nanoparticles using jujube fruit for photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes. Adv. Powder Technol. 2019;30:1551–1557. doi: 10.1016/j.apt.2019.04.033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wu S, Liu J, Tian Z, Cai Y, Ye Y, Yuan Q, Liang C. Highly dispersed ultrafine Pt nanoparticles on reduced graphene oxide nanosheets: In situ sacrificial template synthesis and superior electrocatalytic performance for methanol oxidation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015;7:22935–22940. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b06153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Xie F, Gan M, Jiang M, Ma L. Fe-doped CoP nanotube heterostructure enhanced the catalytic activity of Pt nanoparticles towards methanol oxidation reaction. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2020;45:24807. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.272. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Shafaei Douk A, Saravani H, Noroozifar M. One-pot synthesis of ultrasmall PtAg nanoparticles decorated on graphene as a high-performance catalyst toward methanol oxidation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2018;43:7946–7955. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.03.064. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zhou C, Chen Y, Guo Z, Wang X, Yang Y. Promoted aerobic oxidation of benzyl alcohol on CNT supported platinum by iron oxide. Chem. Commun. 2011;47:7473–7475. doi: 10.1039/c1cc12264a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Pattabiraman R. Electrochemical investigations on carbon supported palladium catalysts. Appl. Catal. A. 1997;153:9. doi: 10.1016/S0926-860X(96)00327-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tiwari JN, Tiwari RN, Lin KL. Controlled synthesis and growth of perfect platinum nanocubes using a pair of low-resistivity fastened silicon wafers and their electrocatalytic properties. Nano Res. 2011;4:541–549. doi: 10.1007/s12274-011-0110-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Liu L, Pippel E, Scholz R, Gosele U. Nanoporous Pt-Co alloy nanowires: Fabrication, characterization, and electrocatalytic properties. Nano Lett. 2009;9:4352–4358. doi: 10.1021/nl902619q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Naidoo QL, Naidoo S, Petrik L, Nechaev A, Ndungu P. The influence of carbon based supports and the role of synthesis procedures on the formation of platinum and platinum-ruthenium clusters and nanoparticles for the development of highly active fuel cell catalysts. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2012;37:9459–9469. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.03.050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Deng J, Zhang J, Chen J, Luo Y, Chen Y, Xue Y, Wang G, Wang R. Fabrication of layered porous TiO2/carbon fiber paper decorated by Pt nanoparticles using atomic layer deposition for efficient methanol electro-oxidation. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2020;874:114468. doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114468. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Wang H, Wang X, Zheng J, Peng F, Yu H. Enhanced activity and durability of nanosized Pt-SnO2/IrO2/CNTs catalyst for methanol electrooxidation. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2015;15:3662–3669. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2015.9274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Dou M, Hou M, Liang D, Lu W, Shao Z, Yi B. SnO2 nanocluster supported Pt catalyst with high stability for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Electrochim. Acta. 2013;92:468–473. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.01.070. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Feng L, Li K, Chang J, Liu C, Xing W. Nanostructured PtRu/C catalyst promoted by CoP as an efficient and robust anode catalyst in direct methanol fuel cells. Nano Energy. 2015;15:462–469. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.05.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ma J, Wang L, Mu X, Cao Y. Enhanced electrocatalytic activity of Pt nanoparticles supported on functionalized graphene for methanol oxidation and oxygen reduction. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015;457:102–107. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2015.06.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Rafiei H, Shirvani M, Ogunseitan O. Removal of lead from aqueous solutions by a poly(acrylic acid)/bentonite nanocomposite. Appl. Water Sci. 2016;6:331–338. doi: 10.1007/s13201-014-0228-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ding G, Wang W, Jiang T, Han B. An efficient palladium catalyst on bentonite for Suzuki-Miyaura reaction at room temperature. Green Chem. 2013;15:3396–3403. doi: 10.1039/c3gc41469h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Peng K, Bhuvanendran N, Ravichandran S, Zhang W, Ma Q, Xing L, Xu Q, Khotseng L, Su H. Carbon supported PtPdCr ternary alloy nanoparticles with enhanced electrocatalytic activity and durability for methanol oxidation reaction. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2020;45:22752–22760. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kim HJ, Ahn YD, Kim J, Kim KS, Jeong YU, Hong JW, Choi SI. Surface elemental distribution effect of Pt-Pb hexagonal nanoplates for electrocatalytic methanol oxidation reaction. Chin. J. Catal. 2020;41:813–819. doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(19)63310-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Khalifeh-Soltani MS, Shams E, Sharifi E. Pt-Ru nanoparticles anchored on poly(brilliant cresyl blue) as a new polymeric support: Application as an efficient electrocatalyst in methanol oxidation reaction. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2020;45:849–860. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.10.071. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Wei D, Ma L, Gan M, Han S, Shen J, Ding J, Zhan W, Zhou C, Zhong X, Xie F. Pt-based catalyst decorated by bimetallic FeNi2P with outstanding CO tolerance and catalytic activity for methanol electrooxidation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2020;45:4875–4886. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.064. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Xue S, Deng W, Yang F, Yang J, Saana Amiinu I, He D, Tang H, Mu S. Hexapod PtRuCu nanocrystalline alloy for highly efficient and stable methanol oxidation. ACS Catal. 2018;8:7578–7584. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b00366. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Zhong JP, Hou C, Li L, Waqas M, Fan YJ, Shen XC, Chen W, Wan LY, Liao HG, Sun SG. A novel strategy for synthesizing Fe, N, and S tridoped graphene-supported Pt nanodendrites toward highly efficient methanol oxidation. J. Catal. 2020;381:275–284. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2019.11.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Huang H, Wei Y, Yang Y, Yan M, He H, Jiang Q, Yang X, Zhu J. Controllable synthesis of grain boundary-enriched Pt nanoworms decorated on graphitic carbon nanosheets for ultrahigh methanol oxidation catalytic activity. J. Energy Chem. 2021;57:601–609. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2020.08.063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Chang J, Feng L, Liu C, Xing W, Hu X. Ni2P enhances the activity and durability of the Pt anode catalyst in direct methanol fuel cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014;7:1628–1632. doi: 10.1039/c4ee00100a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Zhang CW, Xu LB, Chen JF. High loading Pt nanoparticles on ordered mesoporous carbon sphere arrays for highly active methanol electro-oxidation. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2016;27:832–836. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2016.02.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Zhu M, Zhai C, Sun M, Hu Y, Yan B, Du Y. Ultrathin graphitic C3N4 nanosheet as a promising visible-light-activated support for boosting photoelectrocatalytic methanol oxidation. Appl. Catal. B. 2017;203:108–115. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.10.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Cao M, Wu D, Cao R. Recent advances in the stabilization of platinum electrocatalysts for fuel-cell reactions. Chem. Cat. Chem. 2014;6:26–45. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Hu J, Zhai C, Yu C, Zeng L, Liu ZQ, Zhu M. Visible light-enhanced electrocatalytic alcohol oxidation based on two dimensional Pt-BiOBr nanocomposite. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018;524:195. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.03.104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Ding K, Jia Z, Wang Q, He X, Tian N, Tong R, Wang X. Electrochemical behavior of the self-assembled membrane formed by calmodulin (CaM) on a Au substrate. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2001;513:67–71. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0728(01)00576-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71.He Z, Chen J, Liu D, Zhou H, Kuang Y. Electrodeposition of Pt-Ru nanoparticles on carbon nanotubes and their electrocatalytic properties for methanol electrooxidation. Diamond Relat. Mater. 2004;13:1764–1770. doi: 10.1016/j.diamond.2004.03.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Noroozifar M, Khorasani-Motlagh M, Khaleghian-Moghadam R, Ekrami-Kakhki MS, Shahraki M. Incorporation effect of nanosized perovskite LaFe0.7Co0.3O3 on the electrochemical activity of Pt nanoparticles-multi walled carbon nanotube composite toward methanol oxidation. J. Solid State Chem. 2013;201:41–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2013.02.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Xu H, Zhang K, Yan B, Zhong J, Li S, Du Y. Facile synthesis of Pd-decorated Pt/Ru networks with highly improved activity for methanol electrooxidation in alkaline media. New J. Chem. 2017;41:3048–3054. doi: 10.1039/C6NJ03773A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Zhao Y, Wang R, Han Z, Li C, Wang Y, Chi B, Li J, Wang X. Electrooxidation of methanol and ethanol in acidic medium using a platinum electrode modified with lanthanum-doped tantalum oxide film. Electrochim. Acta. 2015;151:544–551. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.11.049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.







