Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 2;36(1):204–230. doi: 10.1007/s10278-022-00721-9

Table 2.

Advantages and limitations for deep learning methods in MRI motion correction

Literature Advantages Limitations
Kustner et al. [17], Sommer et al. [71] •   Patch-based image to image translation networks and these methods are efficient in GPU memory and thus easier to implement in practice •   Motion artefact is of global appearance, and the patch-based methods may not be the optimal solution
Johnson et al. [73] •   A full 3D motion simulation and 3D DL network for motion correction •   3D Unet is used, but the field of view coverage in slice direction is only limited to 8 slices
Lee et al. [79] •   Using information from multi-contrast images to correct motion artefact •   Multiple contrasts may not be available for all the studies, and the method is prone to image registration errors across multiple contrasts
Pawar et al. [19, 19] •   Full 3D motion simulation, large dataset for training, validation on simulated, as well as real motion degraded images in clinical setting •   Processes only 2D slices that may result in slice to slice variations when viewed from the other orthogonal plane
Bilgic et al. [41], Haskell et. al. [49] •   Provided estimates for both motion parameters and motion corrected images •   A two-step approach where DL is used as a preprocessing step for an iterative motion correction model, and potentially multiple sources of errors may add together
Ghodrati et al. [68], Terpstra et al. [75], Tamada et al. [23] •   Methods developed for dynamic MR imaging and can correct for non-rigid motion artefact including cardiac cine and DCE liver MRI •   Small dataset used for training with proof of concept validation with limited clinical evaluation
Khalili et al. [83], Duffy et al. [84], Gong et al. [85], Shaw et al. [74] •   Focused on practical application of motion correction methods by assessing the downstream tasks such as image segmentation, cortical surface reconstruction, and diffusion parameter estimation on motion corrected images •   Actual motion corrected images are not compared with ground truth images