Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 4;6:243. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-04605-8

Fig. 3. Performance of PAthreader for template recognition.

Fig. 3

a The average TM-score for template recognition with and without AlphaFold DB at different cut-off ranges. b, c The proportion of the number of templates with ≥30% and 100% sequence identity removed at different TM-score cut-off. PAthreader# and HHsearch# represent the results obtained by comparing the identified structure with the native structure through TM-align. d The average TM-score for different template rankings, showing the effect of pDMScore on template recognition.