Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 5;25(12):3306–3311. doi: 10.1017/S1368980022001884

Table 1.

Demographic and anthropometric characteristics of participants recruited from Oregon and Texas research studies, presented separately

Food secure (n 141) Food insecure (n 75) P-value
Mean sd Mean sd
Oregon – children (n 103) (n 65)
Age in years 4·4 0·7 4·3 0·8 0·57
Gender
n 47 30 0·95
% female 46 46
BMI z-score 2·3 0·7 2·3 0·7 0·94
BMI percentile 97 5 98 4 0·65
Oregon – parents
Age in years 33 7 34 7 0·25
Gender
n 99 63 0·70
% female 96 97
BMI 33 7 34 7 0·19
People in household 5·1 1·7 5·3 1·5 0·46
n % n %
Parental education 0·02
Less than high school 55 53 49 75
High school and some college 44 43 15 23
College graduate or more 4 4 1 2
Income as % FPL 0·85
≤ 100 % FPL 79 77 52 80
 > 100 FPL 5 5 3 5
Not known/refused 18 18 10 15
Mean sd Mean sd
Texas – children (n 38) (n 10)
Age in years 6·0 1·4 5·5 0·7 0·25
Gender
n 18 5 0·88
% female 47 50
BMI z-score 1·9 0·8 1·7 0·6 0·46
BMI percentile 93 10 92 13 0·81
Texas – parents
Age in years 36 10 34 7 0·55
Gender
n 29 18 0·43
% female 97 100
BMI 32 7 35 8 0·26
n % n %
Parental education 0·25
Less than high school 16 42 7 70
High school diploma or equivalent 19 50 3 30
Any college or college graduate 3 8 0 0
Income as % FPL 0·22
≤ 100 % FPL 27 71 9 90
> 100 FPL 9 24 0
Not known/not sure 2 5 1 10

FPL = federal poverty line.

All comparisons done using Mann–Whitney U tests for non-parametric data; t tests were used for data approximating a normal distribution; Chi-square tests for categorical data.