Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 1;15(3):227–232. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2022-018665

Table 1.

Respondents’ baseline characteristics

Characteristics Overall
N (%) 165 (100)
Male (%) 121 (73.3)
Training: interventionalist (%) 84 (50.9)
Geography (%)
North America 23 (13.9)
South America 2 (1.2)
Europe 112 (67.9)
Africa 1 (0.6)
Middle East 2 (1.2)
Asia 10 (6.1)
Australia 15 (9.1)
Appointment level (%)
Junior 11 (6.7)
Mid-career 28 (17.0)
Senior 126 (76.4)
Annual mechanical thrombectomy volume (%)
<100 50 (30.3)
100–200 66 (40.0)
>200–300 29 (17.6)
>300 20 (12.1)
Dedicated stroke patient care time (%)
<10% 10 (6.1)
10–50% 77 (46.7)
51–99% 63 (38.2)
100% 15 (9.1)
Acceptable uncertainty margin (%), median (IQR)) 3 (1–5)
Trial participation (%)
IVT vs placebo: yes (%) 42 (25.5)
MT+IVT vs IVT: yes (%) 51 (30.9)
MT vs MT +IVT= :yes (%) 51 (30.9)
In patients undergoing MT do you stop IVT before full dose is administered? (%)
No, unless there are clear medical reasons (eg, angiographic signs of bleeding) 102 (61.8)
Yes, as a standard procedure at first device deployment 16 (9.7)
Yes, as a standard procedure after successful reperfusion is reached 7 (4.2)
Yes, on an individual case basis after successful reperfusion is reached 31 (18.8)
Other 9 (5.5)

Data are displayed as n (%), and median (IQR).

IVT, intravenous thrombolysis; MT, mechanical thrombectomy.