Table 2.
Regression results of attitudes toward domestic vaccines.
| Safety (CN) | Effectiveness (CN) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Model 1) | (Model 2) | |||
| β1 (SE) | Adjusted OR1 (95%CI) | β2 (SE) | Adjusted OR2 (95%CI) | |
| Key variables | ||||
| Institutional performance | 0.082 | 1.085 | 0.093 | 1.097 |
| (0.061) | (0.96–1.22) | (0.058) | (0.98–1.23) | |
| Trust in scientists | 0.818*** | 2.265*** | 0.856*** | 2.355*** |
| (0.048) | (2.06–2.49) | (0.048) | (2.14–2.59) | |
| Scientific literacy | −0.018 | 0.982 | −0.034 | 0.966 |
| (0.036) | (0.92–1.05) | (0.034) | (0.90–1.03) | |
| Medical expert | 0.214** | 1.238** | 0.182** | 1.200** |
| (0.063) | (1.10–1.40) | (0.059) | (1.07–1.35) | |
| Traditional media | −0.034 | 0.967 | −0.042 | 0.959 |
| (0.063) | (0.85–1.09) | (0.059) | (0.85–1.08) | |
| Biomedical journal | −0.049 | 0.952 | 0.004 | 1.004 |
| (0.062) | (0.84–1.07) | (0.058) | (0.90–1.12) | |
| Social media | 0.059 | 1.061 | 0.049 | 1.050 |
| (0.059) | (0.94–1.19) | (0.055) | (0.94–1.17) | |
| Control variable | ||||
| Perceived likelihood | −0.020 | 0.980 | −0.013 | 0.987 |
| (0.047) | (0.89–1.07) | (0.044) | (0.91–1.08) | |
| Perceived severity | 0.122** | 1.130** | 0.109** | 1.115** |
| (0.042) | (1.04–1.23) | (0.040) | (1.03–1.21) | |
| Age | 0.034 | 1.034 | −0.009 | 0.991 |
| (0.058) | (0.92–1.16) | (−0.55) | (0.89–1.10) | |
| Gender | −0.287* | 0.750* | −0.379*** | 0.684*** |
| (0.113) | (0.60–0.94) | (0.106) | (0.56–0.84) | |
| Monthly income | 0.086 | 1.090 | 0.089 | 1.093 |
| (0.071) | (0.95–1.25) | (0.066) | (0.96–1.24) | |
| Education | 0.101 | 1.107 | 0.042 | 1.043 |
| (0.059) | (0.99–1.24) | (0.056) | (0.93–1.16) | |
| Log likelihood | −1227.518 | −1368.343 | ||
| LR Chi2 | 454.70(0.000) | 505.13(0.000) | ||
| Nagelkerke R2 | 0.263 | 0.276 | ||
| Classification accuracy | 82.7% | 82.6% | ||
| N | 2,038 | 2,038 | ||
Adjusted OR (95% CI) = adjusted odds ratio and the corresponding 95% confidence interval.
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.