Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 20;11:1121476. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1121476

Table 3.

Regression analysis of unmet mobility needs.

Unadjusted Adjusted
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Age
65–74
75–84 1.14 0.97, 1.34 0.82 0.68, 0.99
85 and up 1.39 1.08, 1.79 0.65 0.47, 0.89
Sex
Male
Female 1.19 1.02, 1.38 0.96 0.81, 1.14
Marital status
Married
Not Married 1.45 1.25, 1.68 1.13 0.95, 1.35
Main language at home
English
Other 1.41 1.07, 1.83 0.79 0.57, 1.08
Weekly income
More than $500
$500 or Less 1.99 1.69, 2.35 1.39 1.15, 1.68
Self-rated health
Excellent or very good
Good or Fair 3.84 3.18, 4.66 2.13 1.73, 2.64
Poor 22.84 17.29, 30.27 4.30 3.06, 6.04
Long-term condition
No
Yes 4.05 2.87, 5.92 1.55 1.08, 2.31
Limited in everyday physical activities
No
Yes 6.10 5.22, 7.13 2.36 1.95, 2.86
Level of distress
Low to moderate
High to very high 7.38 6.18, 8.81 3.15 2.56, 3.87
License status
Licensed
Not licensed 3.63 3.02, 4.35 1.79 1.40, 2.26
Public transport ability
All forms
Some forms 5.09 3.86, 6.66 1.95 1.41, 2.68
No form 5.36 4.39, 6.52 2.14 1.66, 2.75
Residential location
Major city
Inner regional 0.90 0.75, 1.07 0.81 0.66, 0.98
Other 0.77 0.60, 0.98 0.61 0.46, 0.80

Bold values are statistically significant.