. 2023 Mar 6;13(11):7280–7292. doi: 10.1039/d3ra00064h

Comparison of maximum adsorption capacity of FCN with other solid adsorbents.

Adsorbents	Adsorption conditions	q _m (mg g⁻¹)	References
Chemically modified H₃PO₄	2.0 g L⁻¹, pH 7, 2 h, 25 °C	10.33	27
NH₄Cl-induced activated carbon	0.2 g L⁻¹, pH 7, 6 h, 25 °C	250.00	38
Chitosan/carbon nanotube	0.5 g L⁻¹, pH 5.5, 1 h, 25 °C	222.86	50
Fe₃O₄ – guar gum	10.0 g L⁻¹, pH 7, 3 h, 25 °C	47.17	51
Fe₃O₄ – guar gum-montmorillonite	10.0 g L⁻¹, pH 7, 3 h, 25 °C	80.00	51
Fe₃O₄/SiO₂–NH₂ nanocrystals	0.004 g L⁻¹, pH 6, 0.42 h, 25 °C	206.18	52
Ordered mesoporous silica	0.1 g L⁻¹, pH 6, 1.5 h, 25 °C	142.00	53
Propyl methacrylate-modified ordered mesoporous silica	0.1 g L⁻¹, pH 6, 1.5 h, 25 °C	254.00	53
Loess	1.0 g L⁻¹, pH 7, 24 h, 25 °C	24.69	54
Activated carbon	1.0 g L⁻¹, pH 7, 24 h, 25 °C	202.75	54
MIL-101(Cr)	0.75 g L⁻¹, pH 7, 1.1 h, 25 °C	260.43	36
FCN	1.0 g L⁻¹, pH 7, 20 h, 38 °C	294.98	[This research]