Table 2.
Multivariate regression for effect of serum S100A11 level on metabolic markers in different models, stratified by glucose tolerance and gender
| CIR (β (95%CI)P) | HOMA-IR (β (95%CI)P) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norma | IGT | Diabetes | Male | Female | |
| Crude Mode l | 29.66 (− 5.35, 64.67) 0.1069 | − 11.39 (− 32.04, 9.25) 0.2902 | 0.04 (− 2.78, 2.87) 0.9756 | 0.48 (0.27, 0.69) < 0.0001 | 0.10 (− 0.45, 0.65) 0.7296 |
| Adjusted Mode II | 24.29 (− 11.19, 59.76) 0.1909 | − 15.79 (− 33.98, 2.40) 0.1043 | − 0.41 (− 3.42, 2.61) 0.7933 | 0.47 (0.26, 0.68) 0.0001 | 0.11 (− 0.36, 0.58) 0.6494 |
| Adjusted Model II | 21.57 (− 5.30, 48.45) 0.1287 | − 17.32 (− 30.38, − 4.25) 0.0188 | 0.05 (− 2.19, 2.28) 0.9657 | 0.32 (0.06, 0.58) 0.0214 | − 0.28 (− 0.77, 0.21) 0.2645 |
Crude model: we did not adjust other covariates
Adjusted model I: We adjusted gender, age, BMI, WHR (stratified by glucose tolerance). We adjusted age, BMI, WHR (stratified by gender)
Adjusted model II: We adjusted gender, age, BMI, WHR, HbA1c, FPG, FPI (stratified by glucose tolerance). We adjusted AGE, BMI, WHR, HbA1c, 0.5hPPI, 0.5hPPG, glucose tolerance (stratified by gender)