Table 2.

Results of hypothesis testing for the point estimates of the mean accommodative lags from the Grand Seiko autorefractor under different lens wearing conditions when the target distance was the same. The values in the second, fourth and sixth columns are the mean lag differences between lens conditions (first condition – second condition).

Comparison	40 cm	p value	33 cm	p value	25 cm	p value
SVL vs PAL1	0.284	0.003	0.216	0.042	0.172	0.046
SVL vs PAL2	0.405	<0.001	0.277	0.001	0.277	0.009
PAL1 vs PAL2	0.104	0.232	0.085	0.369	0.126	0.299