Table 3. Values of chemical rates and feedback parameters obtained after optimising the two-tier two-branch channel with inter-branch feedback on the internalisation rate of the non-signalling branch, keeping the receptor profiles spatially uniform, with and without uncorrelated noise.
The optimised values of the chemical rates quoted below are scaled by the unbinding rate ru, taken to be 1.
| Parameter (Symbol) | Optimised value | |
|---|---|---|
| uniform receptor profiles | uniform receptor profiles with uncorrelated noise | |
| Chemical rates | ||
| Signalling branch | ||
| Binding rate () | 0.0922 | 0.0782 |
| Degradation rate in tier 1 () | 0.0089 | 0.0041 |
| Degradation rate in tier 2 () | 0.0092 | 0.0095 |
| Internalisation rate () | 0.0225 | 0.0611 |
| Recycling rate () | 0.0403 | 0.0971 |
| Non-signalling branch | ||
| Binding rate () | 0.0464 | 0.0265 |
| Degradation rate in tier 1 () | 0.0035 | 0.0045 |
| Degradation rate in tier 2 () | 0.0071 | 0.0068 |
| Internalisation rate () | 0.02 | 0.0513 |
| Recycling rate () | 0.0989 | 0.0770 |
| Conjugation rate () | 0.7605 | 0.7579 |
| Splitting rate () | 0.7038 | 0.3036 |
| Feedback control | ||
| Amplification () | - | - |
| Feedback Sensitivity () | 0.0939 | 0.1946 |
| Feedback strength () | 4.6310 | 0.6202 |
| Tier-wise weights | ||
| weight of tier 1 (w1) | 0.0046 | 0.2875 |
| weight of tier 2 (w2) | 0.9954 | 0.7125 |