Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Mar 7.
Published in final edited form as: Sci Total Environ. 2019 Dec 2;716:135881. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135881

Table 5.

Multilevel, mixed-effects tobit regression models of food insecurity (HFIAS) scores using three measures of household water expenditures and controlling for select household characteristics, including an interaction term for water insecurity score and water expenditures (n = 3655).

Model 7 Model 8 Model 9
Β SE β SE β SE
Fixed effects
 Water expenditures measure
  Absolute USD Z-score −0.42 0.24
  % income 0.05* 0.02
  % Income Z-score 1.23*** 0.27
 Household characteristic
  Age 0.02* 0.01 0.02* 0.01 0.02* 0.01
  Gender −0.26 0.26 −0.23 0.26 −0.23 0.26
  Number of children 0.37*** 0.07 0.34*** 0.07 0.34*** 0.07
  Amount of stored drinking water (100 l) −0.00 0.00 −0.00 0.00 −0.00 0.00
  Total water storage (100 l) −0.00 0.00 −0.00 0.00 −0.00 0.00
  Primary water source is purchased/vended −2.03*** 0.37 −2.44*** 0.37 −2.53*** 0.37
  Rural context 1.23 0.64 1.34** 0.64 1.31* 0.64
  Water insecurity score 0.51*** 0.02 0.49*** 0.02 0.49*** 0.02
  Water insecurity score * expenditures (interaction term) −0.05* 0.02 0.00 0.00 −0.04 0.02
Random effects
 Cluster 5.52 2.05 5.34 2.05 5.34 2.04
 Site 16.68 6.49 16.57 6.46 16.56 6.47
 Model diagnostics (log likelihood) −8994.81 −9001.76 −8995.97

Note

*

= P < 0.05.

**

= P < 0.01.

***

= P < 0.001.