Wang 2008a.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Type: preclinical Design: cross‐over Objective: to determine whether pregabalin and morphine could inhibit secondary hyperalgesia and allodynia induced by ID capsaicin compared with the active placebo diphenhydramine hydrochloride and true placebo; and to evaluate the value of diphenhydramine as a control. Treatment duration: instant (single dose) Follow‐up duration (including treatment duration): 240 minutes from capsaicin; 265 minutes from randomised IV treatment/315 minutes from randomised oral treatment; 330 minutes from first assessment; per cross‐over period (separate days) Washout between cross‐over periods: crossover periods were on separate days, no further information |
|
Data | Country: USA (presumably) Condition: experimental capsaicin‐induced pain Number of people randomised: 20 Number of people analysed: 20 for each placebo type |
|
Comparisons | Active placebo: diphenhydramine hydrochloride (50 mg) Standard placebo: not described Experimental intervention: 2 groups: pregabalin (300 mg) and morphine (10 mg) Administration: oral (except IV morphine) |
|
Outcomes | Participant‐reported outcome: area of hyperalgesia Observer‐reported outcome: area of flare Harm outcome: none Co‐intervention outcome: none |
|
Terminology for active placebo | "Active placebo" a priori | |
Scores and unpleasantness of the active placebo | Adequacy: 3
Risk of therapeutic effect: 2 Unpleasant/neutral/pleasant: unpleasant |
|
Funding and conflicts of interest | Industry funded. All trial authors had conflicts of interest. | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Item | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Free from risk of bias arising from the randomisation process | Yes | Computer‐generated allocation schedule. Described as blinded to investigators and participants. Probably concealment of allocation |
Free from risk of bias in selection of the reported result All outcomes | Unclear | No information. |