Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 26;191(9):1584–1600. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac082

Table 5.

Hazard Ratios for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma According to Quintile of Dietary Index for Men (n = 315,780) in the National Institutes of Health–AARP Diet and Health Study, United States, 1995–2011

Diet Quality No. Person-Years No. ofPDAC Cases Age-AdjustedHR a 95%CI P forTrend b Multivariable-Adjusted HR c 95%CI P forTrend b
HEI-2015
 Quintile 1 (lowest) 63,156 816,953 421 1.00 Referent 1.00 Referent
 Quintile 2 63,156 828,856 422 0.95 0.83, 1.09 0.96 0.83, 1.09
 Quintile 3 63,156 836,086 391 0.85 0.74, 0.98 0.86 0.75, 0.99
 Quintile 4 63,156 841,643 381 0.80 0.70, 0.92 0.82 0.72, 0.95
 Quintile 5 (highest) 63,156 849,410 373 0.75 0.66, 0.87 0.78 0.68, 0.90
 Continuousb 0.99 0.99, 0.99 <0.0001 0.99 0.99, 1.00 <0.0001
AHEI-2010
 Quintile 1 (lowest) 63,156 816,127 404 1.00 Referent 1.00 Referent
 Quintile 2 63,156 826,876 390 0.93 0.81, 1.06 0.93 0.81, 1.07
 Quintile 3 63,156 833,982 405 0.94 0.82, 1.08 0.95 0.83, 1.09
 Quintile 4 63,156 841,860 397 0.91 0.79, 1.04 0.92 0.80, 1.05
 Quintile 5 (highest) 63,156 854,104 392 0.87 0.76, 1.00 0.89 0.77, 1.02
 Continuousb 1.00 0.99, 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.99, 1.00 0.07
aMed
 Quintile 1 (lowest) 74,653 967,310 480 1.00 Referent 1.00 Referent
 Quintile 2 59,913 787,764 398 1.00 0.88, 1.14 1.00 0.88, 1.14
 Quintile 3 64,601 854,540 391 0.90 0.79, 1.03 0.90 0.78, 1.02
 Quintile 4 56,399 753,150 360 0.94 0.82, 1.07 0.93 0.81, 1.07
 Quintile 5 (highest) 60,214 810,185 359 0.86 0.75, 0.98 0.85 0.74, 0.98
 Continuousb 0.97 0.95, 1.00 0.03 0.97 0.95, 1.00 0.04
DASH-Fung
 Quintile 1 (lowest) 55,786 727,251 376 1.00 Referent 1.00 Referent
 Quintile 2 85,120 1,119,633 531 0.88 0.77, 1.00 0.88 0.77, 1.00
 Quintile 3 32,847 434,230 214 0.89 0.76, 1.06 0.89 0.76, 1.06
 Quintile 4 86,892 1,152,784 543 0.84 0.74, 0.96 0.84 0.74, 0.96
 Quintile 5 (highest) 55,135 739,051 324 0.77 0.66, 0.89 0.77 0.66, 0.90
 Continuousb 0.98 0.97, 0.99 0.0009 0.98 0.97, 0.99 0.002
DASH-Mellen
 Quintile 1 (lowest) 55,145 720,680 360 1.00 Referent 1.00 Referent
 Quintile 2 61,838 811,813 431 1.04 0.91, 1.20 1.04 0.90, 1.19
 Quintile 3 71,040 937,207 432 0.89 0.77, 1.02 0.89 0.77, 1.02
 Quintile 4 59,862 794,981 371 0.89 0.77, 1.03 0.90 0.77, 1.04
 Quintile 5 (highest) 67,895 908,269 394 0.81 0.70, 0.93 0.82 0.71, 0.95
 Continuousb 0.95 0.93, 0.98 0.0002 0.95 0.93, 0.98 0.0006

Abbreviations: AHEI-2010, Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010; aMed, alternate Mediterranean diet; CI, confidence interval; DASH, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension; HEI-2015, Healthy Eating Index-2015; HR, hazard ratio; PDAC, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

a Estimated using Cox proportional hazard regression model with person-years as the underlying time metric. HRs compares the risk of developing PDAC for participants in each quintile of diet quality score compared with participants in the lowest quintile (lower adherence).

b Hazard ratios and P for trend per 1-standard deviation increase. P for interaction by sex > 0.07 for all scores.

c Multivariable models adjusted for age at baseline (years, continuous), smoking status (never smoker, quit >10 years ago, quit 5–9 years ago, quit 1–4 years ago, quit <1 year or current smoker ≤20 cigarettes/day, quit <1 year or current smoker >20 cigarettes/day, or missing), body mass index (weight (kg)/height (m)2: <25.0, 25.0–29.9, ≥30.0, or missing), diabetes (yes vs. no), and total energy intake (kcal/day).