Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 27;55:2572. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v55.2572

Table I.

Characteristics of eligible studies

Number Author, year Study design Participant Sample size Mean age, years ± SD Time-points Intervention Outcome Result (Mean ± SD) Significance
DPT Other Pain Functional outcome
1 Rabago, et al. (13) 2013 RCT Adults aged 40–76 years with knee OA. Diagnosis based on ACR criteria DPT: 30 participants
Saline: 29 participants
Exercise: 31 participants
Total: 56.7 ± 7.2
DPT: 56.8 ± 7.9
Saline: 56.8 ± 6.7
Exercise: 56.4 ± 7.0
Baseline, 5th week, 9th week, 12th week, 24th week, 52nd week. Injections were performed 3 times, interval 1 month (additional session 2 times injection)
6 mL 25% dextrose injected intra-articularly.
0.5 mL 15% dextrose injected extra-articularly (at each ligament insertion)
SALINE:
Injections performed 3 times, interval 1 month (additional session 2 times injection)
6 mL 0.9% sodium chloride injected intra-articularly
0.5 mL 15% 0.9% sodium chloride injected extra-articularly (at each ligament insertion)
EXERCISE:
3 sessions per week, 1 session
daily, 10 repetitions per exercise gradually increase therapy as tolerated over 20 weeks (5 sessions per week, 3 times daily, 15 repetitions per exercise) and continue as desired
Pain: pain WOMAC
Functional outcome: total WOMAC
Score changes
DPT group
baseline: 66.8 ± 14.9, week 5: –8.17 ± 19.12; week 9: –14.00 ± 19.28, week 12: –11.78 ± 18.81, week 24: –15.50 ± 18.84, week 52: –14.18 ± 18.46
Saline group
baseline: 66.7 ± 16.1, week 5: –3.28 ± 18.85, week 9: –5.29 ± 18.15, week 12: –5.79 ± 17.98, week 24: –6.40 ± 18.15, week 52: –7.38 ± 18.35
Exercise group
baseline: 63.2 ± 13.1, week 5: –4.53 ± 18.57,week 9: –3.44 ± 18.45, week 12: –4.89 ± 18.3, week 24: –8.07 ± 18.71, week 52: –9.24 ± 18.51
Score changes
DPT group
baseline: 63.1 ± 15.0; week 5: –7.94 ± 17.58; week 9: –13.91 ± 17.69; week 12: –13.31 ± 17.25; week 24: –15.85 ± 17.25; week 52: –15.32 ± 16.9)
Saline group
baseline: 62.7 ± 14.3; week 5: –5.22 ± 17.29; week 9: –6.75 ± 16.67; week 12: –8.19 ± 16.51; week 24: –8.12 ± 16.65; week 52: –7.59 ± 16.8
Exercise group
baseline: 60.5 ± 11.3; week 5: –4.42 ± 16.99; week 9: –2.51 ± 16.94; week 12: –4.26 ± 16.8; week 24: –8.48 ± 17.04;
week 52: –8.24 ± 16.98
Dextrose outperformed saline (p < 0.05) and exercise (p < 0.05) for pain scale and functional outcome in week 9, week 24, and week 52
Dextrose outperformed exercise (p < 0.05) for pain scale and functional outcome in week 12
There were no other side-effects or adverse events.
2 Hosseini, et al. (14) 2019 RCT Age 50–75 years with grade II or more knee OA. Diagnosis based on ACR criteria DPT: 52 participants
HA: 52 participants
DPT: 61.2 ± 11.5
HA: 63.7 ± 12.2
Baseline, 12th week. Injections performed 3 times, interval 1 week
10 mL 12.5% hypertonic dextrose injected extra-articularly through 4 points of injection.
Injections performed 3 times, interval 1 week
2.5 mL hyaluronic acid injected intra-articularly via the inferomedial of patella
Pain: VAS
Functional outcome: WOMAC score
Time-point score
DPT group
Baseline: 7.8 ± 1.4;
12th week: 2.5 ± 1.1
HA group
Baseline: 8.2 ± 1.7;
12th week 2.1 ± 0.6
Time-point score
DPT group
Baseline: 52.7 ± 9.8;
12th week 83.7 ± 12.7;
HA group
Baseline: 55.9 ± 10.4;
12th week 88.5 ± 15.6
HA outperformed DPT for pain scale (p = 0.02) and total WOMAC (p < 0.001) at week 12
Our results have shown no serious adverse events
3 Jahangiri, et al. (21)
2014
RCT Age 42–83 years with hand OA. Diagnosis based on clinical evaluation and radiological examination. DPT: 30 participants
LC: 30 participants
Total: 63.6 ± 9.7
DPT: 63.9 ± 9.4
LC: 63.3 ± 10.1
Baseline, 1st month, 2nd months, and 6th months Injections performed 3 times, interval 1 month.
0.5 mL 20% DPT mixed with 0.5 mL 2% lidocaine injected intra-articularly and extra-articularly
Injections performed 3 times, interval 1 month.
First 2 months placebo injectate 1 mL 0.9% saline administered. At third month, 40 mg methylprednisolone acetate (0.5 mL) mixed with 0.5 mL 2% lidocaine injected intra-articularly and extra-articularly
Pain: VAS
Functional outcome: total HAQ-DI
Score changes DPT vs HA
0–1st month:– 0.7 ± 3.87;
0–2nd month: 1.0 ± 3.676;
0–6th month: 1.1 ± 3.483
Score changes DPT vs HA
0–1st month: 0.5 ± 2.90;
0–2nd month: 1.0 ± 3.289;
0–6th month: 1.0 ± 3.096
In the 2nd month, the pain score was significantly more with LC (p = 0.02). Hand function improved significantly in the group DPT compared with LC (p = 0.01). After 6 months, pain on movement more significant in the group DPT (p = 0.02). Hand function was significantly better with DPT (0.01).
Adverse event info not available
4 Gül, et al. (15) 2020 RCT Age 18–80 years with secondary hip OA (DDH refractory) who had Crowe Type I–IV lesions DPT: 20 participants (23 hips)
Exercise: 21 participants (23 hips)
DPT: 45.74 ± 16.86
Exercise: 47.56 ± 13.8
Baseline, 21st day, 3rd month, 6th month, 12th month. Injections were repeat-ed with 21-day intervals. Injection sessions were terminated when the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores decreased to 75% of pre-injection values (maximum 6 times injection)
Supine injection points: 8 mL 15% dextrose solution injected extra-articularly insertions. 8 mL 25% dextrose applied intra-articularly
Lateral injection points: 12 mL 15% dextrose injected extra-articularly
Home exercise:
3 times a day after 3 days of injections
All participants received standard 12-week rehabilitation protocol and supervised progressive resistance training consisting of 30 training sessions
Home exercise:
3 times a day after the 12-week rehabilitation programme
Pain: VAS
Functional outcome: HHS
Score changes
DPT group
0–21 days: – 3.1 ± 1.2;
0–3 months: – 4.0 ± 1.8;
0–6 months: – 4.6 ± 2.6;
0–12 months:– 4.5 ± 2.4.
Exercise group
0–21 days: – 1.9 ± 0.9
0–3 months: – 2.6 ± 1.9
0–6 months: 2.8 ± 2.5;
0–12 months: 2.9 ± 2.5
Score changes
DPT group
0–21 days: 16.8 ± 7.3;
0–3 months: 19.5 ± 8.9;
0–6 months: 24.2 ± 14.0;
0–12 months: 24.3 ± 13.4.
Exercise group
0–21 days: 6.7 ± 6.2;
0–3 months: 19.5 ± 8.9;
0–6 months: 14.8 ± 12.4;
0–12 months: 16.5 ± 11.3
Dextrose injection significantly outperformed the control injection in pain improvement from 0–21 days (p = 0.001), 0–3 months (p = 0.008), 6 months (p = 0.016) and 0–12 months (p = 0.017), in dysfunction improvement from 0–21 days (p < 0.001), 0–3 months (p = 0.006), 6 months (p = 0.007) and 0–12 months (p = 0.018).
Adverse event
Only 3 participants in the PrT group had severe pain in the injection sites and they took acetaminophen 4 times/day for 5–7 days after injections
5 Rahimzadeh, et al. (3)
2018
RCT Knee OA DPT: 21 participants
PRP: 21 participants
DPT: 64.3 ± 5.31;
PRP: 65.5 ± 6.64
Baseline, 1st month, 2nd months, 6th months Injections performed 2 times, interval 1 month
7 mL dextrose 25% injected IA by USG guiding
Injections performed 2 times, interval 1 month
7 mL PRP solution injected IA by USG guiding
Pain: pain WOMAC
Functional outcome: total WOMAC
Time-point score
DPT group
Baseline: 14.6 ± 1.4;
1st month: 9.5 ± 2.3;
2nd month: 7.1 ± 1.7;
6th month: 8 ± 1.6.
PRP group
Baseline: 14.8 ± 1.5;
1st month: 9.2 ± 2.3;
2nd month: 5.4 ± 1.8;
6th month: 6.2 ± 2.1
Time-point score
DPT group
Baseline: 67.1 ± 7.9;
1st month: 43.8 ± 8.2;
2nd month: 34.8 ± 6.9;
6th month: 38.7 ± 6.6.
PRP group
Baseline: 67.9 ± 7.3;
1st month: 42.9 ± 10.85;
2nd month: 27.1 ± 9.1;
6th month: 31.4 ± 10.2
Better result in PRP at 2 month and 6 month for functional outcome and pain scale
Functional outcome (2,6): (p = 0.004; p = 0.009)
Pain (2,6):
(p = 0.002; p = 0.003)
Adverse effect
No significant side-effects were observed
6 Reeves & Hassanein (18)
2000
RCT Hand OA DPT: 13 participants
NS: 14 participants
DPT: 64.5 ± 9.2
NS: 63.9 ± 9.4
Baseline, 6th month Injections were performed 3 times, interval 2 months.
0.25–0.5 mL 10% dextrose and 0.075% xylocaine in bacteriostatic
Water was injected intra-articularly
Injections were performed 3 times, interval 2 months.
0.25–0.5 mL 0.075% xylocaine in bacteriostatic
Water injected intra-articularly
Pain: VAS (movement, rest, grip).
Functional outcome: flexion motion (range)
Score changes
DPT group
rest pain –0.88 ± 1.47;
movement pain –1.89 ± 1.40;
grip pain –1.8 ± 1.51.
NS group
rest pain –0.58 ± 1.45;
movement pain –0.62 ± 1.38;
grip pain –0.92 ± 1.53.
Score changes
DPT group
Flexion: +8.01 ± 12.83;
NS group
Flexion: –8.65 ± 10.88
DPT outperformed NS in pain movement (p = 0.027)
and functional outcome (p = 0.003)
Side-effect information
Discomfort after injection lasting a few minutes to several days.
7 Reeves & Hassanein (18)
2000
RCT Knee OA with or without ACL laxity 25 samples were analysed 63 years Baseline, 6th month Injections performed 3 times, interval 2 months
9 cc 10% dextrose and 0.075% lidocaine in bacteriostatic water injected intra-articularly
Injections performed 3 times, interval 2 months
9 cc 075% lidocaine in bacteriostatic water injected intra-articularly
Pain: VAS (pain at rest, walking, stair use)
Functional outcome: buckling and flexion range
Score changes
DPT group
Pain at rest: 0.54 (0.24)
Pain with walking: 1.04 (0.25)
Pain with stair use: 1.37 (0.31)
NS group
Pain at rest: 1.04 (0.25)
Pain with walking: 0.98 (0.32)
Pain with stair use: 1.23 (0.32)
Score changes
DPT group
Buckling 5.24 (2.23)
Flexion range: 13.24 (2.15)
NS group
Buckling 0.79 (2.27)
Flexion range: 7.69 (2.19)
Pain at rest, pain with walking, pain with stair use, swelling, buckling episodes, and flexion range demonstrated a statistically superior effect of active solution (p = 0.015)
ADVERSE EVENT
Discomfort after injection did not appear.
One person (control)
had a flare post-injection that appeared substantial, requiring interarticular steroid and then referral to an orthopaedic surgeon. No allergic reactions or infections were noted
8 Rahimzadeh, et al. (17)
2014
RCT Primary knee OA Dextrose: 26 participants Erythropoietin: 20 participants,
Pulsed radiofrequency: 24 participants
Total: 59.90 ± 8.08
Dextrose: 60.57 ± 7.47
Erythropoietin: 61.15 ± 7.47, Pulsed radiofrequency: 56.95 ± 8.31
Baseline, 2nd week, 4th week, and 12th week Single-dose injection
Intra-articular injection of 5 cc 0.5% ropivacaine together with 5 cc dextrose 25%
Single-dose injection
ERYTHROPOIETIN
GROUP
intra-articular injection of 5 cc ropivacaine 0.5% together with 4,000 international units erythropoietin.
PULSED RADIOFREQUENCY GROUP:
participants underwent pulsed
radiofrequency (20 ms, 2 Hz, 45 V, 15 min, 42°C, 2 cycles) intra-articular
Pain: VAS
Functional outcome: ROM
Time-point score
DPT group:
Baseline: 7.11 ± 1.03
2nd week: 4.50 ± 1.36
4th week: 4.65 ± 1.38
12th week: 5.53 ± 1.60
Erythropoietin group:
Baseline: 6.65 ± 0.98
2nd week: 3.15 ± 1.08
4th week: 3.15 ± 0.87
12th week: 3.50 ± 1.23
Pulsed radiofrequency group:
Baseline: 7.08 ± 1.41
2nd week: 3.25 ± 2.00
4th week: 3.87 ± 1.70
12th week: 5.50 ± 1.93
Time-point score
DPT group:
Baseline: 101 ± 1.36
2nd week: 106 ± 1.43
4th week: 110 ± 1.26
12th week: 113 ± 2.16
Erythropoietin group:
Baseline: 98.08 ± 1.60
2nd week: 124 ± 1.50
4th week: 124 ± 1.4
12th week: 123 ± 1.53
Pulsed radiofrequency group:
Baseline: 95 ± 1.97
2nd week: 105 ± 2.06
4th week: 110 ± 2.11
12th week: 113 ± 2.16
Erythropoietin more efficient than other 2 interventions.
DPT outperformed PRF in reducing pain at 2nd week
Side-effect:
No particular side-effect related to the
above-mentioned interventions was observed
9 Hashemi, et al. (9)
2015
RCT Age 40–75 years with knee OA diagnosed with clinical and radiographic evaluation DPT: 40 participants
OPT: 40 participants
DPT: 57.3 ± 15.1;
OPT: 59.1 ± 12.3
Baseline and 3rd month. Injections repeated 3 times with 7–10 days interval
Intra-articular Hypertonic dextrose prolotherapy (12.5% dextrose)
Injections repeated 3 times with 7–10 days interval
Intra-articular 15 g/mL ozone-oxygen mixture (5–7 cm3)
Pain: VAS
Functional outcome: WOMAC
Time-point score
DPT group:
Baseline: 8.1 ± 1.1
3rd month: 3 ± 1.2
OPT group:
Baseline: 7.6 ± 1.3
3rd month: 2.8 ± 1.1
Time-point score
DPT group:
Baseline: 58.5 ± 13.3
3rd month: 83.7 ± 15.3
OPT group:
Baseline: 56.3 ± 11.5
3rd month: 81.6 ± 13.7
Have same effectiveness (p > 0.05)
Side-effect:
No available information
10 Waluyo et al. (13)
2021
RCT Knee OA diagnosed based on ACR criteria DPT: 26 participants
HA: 21 participants
Total: 62.4 ± 8.7
DPT group: 62.6 ± 6.9
HA group: 62.0 ± 10.8
Baseline and 12th week Injections repeated 3 times with 4 weeks interval
5 mL 25% dextrose injected Intra-articularly and 30–40 mL 15% dextrose injected extra-articularly
Injections repeated 5 times with 1 week interval
2 mL hyaluronic acid intra-articular injection (~10 mg)
Pain: NRS
Functional outcome: total WOMAC
Score changes
DPT group
baseline: 4.85 ± 1.71
12th week: –3.38 ± 2.21
HA group
baseline: 3.48 ± 1.53
12th week: –1.62 ± 1.63
Score changes
DPT group
baseline: 36.08 ± 10.06
12th week: –16.92 ± 13.86
HA group
Baseline: 24.81 ± 17.25
12th week: –8.95 ± 9.79
More improvement in DPT group for pain scale.
Side-effect:
No serious adverse event occurred. All participants experienced expected mild-to moderate post-injection pain within 2–3 days. Only 1 participant, from the prolotherapy group, took paracetamol due to severe pain post-injection.
11 Sert, et al. (11)
2020
RCT Aged 40–70 years with knee pain refractory to conservative therapy and diagnosed as Grade 2 or 3 KOA according to KL classification DPT: 21 participants
Saline: 22 participants
Exercise: 19 participants
DPT: 55.7 ± 6.6
Saline: 54.4 ± 7.3
Exercise: 52.0 ± 6.1
Baseline, 6th week and 18th week Injections performed 3 times with 3 weeks interval and performed a home-based exercise programme
5 mL 25% dextrose applied intra-articularly
10 mL 15% dextrose solution was applied extra-articularly.
SALINE:
Injections performed 3 times with 3 weeks interval and performed a home-based exercise programme
2.5 mL 0.9% sodium chloride +2.5ml 1% lidocaine applied intra-articularly
5 mL 0.9% sodium chloride +5ml 1% lidocaine extra-articularly
EXERCISE:
Exercise programme was performed for at least 3 days a week and included hamstring and quadriceps stretching, isometric quadriceps strengthening exercises, and terminal knee extension exercises, each comprising 3 sets with 10 repetitions.
Pain: VAS
Functional outcome: total WOMAC
Time-point score
DPT group
baseline: 7.2 ± 1.0;
6-week: 4.1 ± 1.8;
18-week: 1.1 ± 1.9
Saline group
baseline: 7.4 ± 2.0;
6-week: 4.9 ± 2.2;
18-week: 4.6 ± 1.8
Exercise group
baseline: 7.0 ± 0.9;
6-week: 4.9 ± 2.0;
18-week: 4.5 ± 2.0
Time-point change
DPT group
baseline: 68.7 ± 11.4;
6-week: 44.4 ± 11.5;
18-week: 32.7 ± 11.6
Saline group
baseline: 69.2 ± 17.6;
6-week: 50.5 ± 16.7;
18-week: 46.7 ± 13.5
Exercise group
baseline: 68.9 ± 11.9;
6-week: 61.0 ± 10.8;
18-week: 59.8 ± 10.7
The WOMAC and VAS-pain scores significantly decreased at 18 weeks in the DPT compared with the saline (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively) and exercise (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively)
12 Sit, et al. (20)
2020
RCT Age 45–75 years, diagnosis of KOA based on ACR criteria DPT: 38 participants
Saline: 38 participants
Total: 63.2 ± 5.5
DPT: 62.8 ± 5.8
Saline: 63.7 ± 5.2
Baseline, 16th week, 26th week, and 52nd week. Injections performed 4 times, interval 4 weeks
5 mL 25% dextrose injected intra-articularly by USG guiding
Injections were performed 4 times, interval 4 weeks
5 mL normal saline injected intra-articularly by USG guiding
Pain: VAS
Functional outcome: total WOMAC
Pain intensity (VAS)b
16 weeks: –3.70 (–13.83 to 6.43)
26 weeks: –6.73 (–16.86 to 3.40)
52 weeks: –10.98 (–21.36 to –0.61)
Overall trend: –7.02 (–14.50 to 0.46)
WOMAC composite b
16 weeks: –4.33 (–12.27 to 3.62)
26 weeks: –7.34 (–15.28 to 0.61)
52 weeks: –9.65 (–17.77 to –1.53)
Overall trend: –7.03 (–13.14 to –0.92)
In the study’s primary linear mixed model analysis, all outcomes demonstrated a positive trend favouring the DPT group over the saline group.
The composite WOMAC score at 52 weeks showed a difference-in-difference estimate of –9,65 (95% CI, –17.77 to –1.53, p = 0.020), VAS pain intensity score of –10.98 (95% CI, –21.36 to –0.61, p = 0.038)
13 Pishgahi, et al. (12)
2020
RCT Knee osteoarthritis participants age 40–75 years with radiological signs of grade II, III, and IV DPT: 30 participants
PRP: 30 participants
ACS: 32 participants
DPT: 57.9 ± 1.62;
PRP: 58.93 ± 1.71;
ACS: 61.28 ± 1.67
Baseline, 1st month, and 6th month Injections administered 3 times, interval 1 week
The combination of 50% dextrose (2 mL), bacteriostatic water (2 mL), and 2% lidocaine (1 mL) injected intra-articularly by USG guidance
PRP
Injections were administered 2 times, interval 1 week
4× concentration of platelets and the lowest leukocyte of PRP was injected intra-articularly by USG guidance.
ACS
Injections administered 2 times, interval 1 week
2 mL ACS injected intra-articularly by USG guidance.
Pain: VAS
Functional outcome: total WOMAC
Time-point score
DPT group
Basal: 67.00 ± 2.50
1 month: 63.33 ± 2.47
6 month: 63.30 ± 2.92
PRP group
Basal: 61.10 ± 1.21
1 month: 56.33 ± 1.021
6 month: 55.00 ± 2.27
ACS group
Basal: 61.25 ± 3.44
1 month: 46.88 ± 4.45
6 month: 35.00 ± 3.51
Time-point score
DPT group
Basal: 65.93 ± 1.67
1 month: 71.67 ± 2.95
6 month: 72.33 ± 2.57
PRP group
Basal: 60.33 ± 3.70
1 month: 46.67 ± 4.30
6 month: 45.67 ± 3.82
ACS group
Basal: 56.28 ± 3.13
1 month: 49.53 ± 3.67
6 month: 34.88 ± 3.35
ACS outperformed DPT in pain and functional outcomes
PRP outperformed DPT in functional outcomes, but not significantly different in pain.
14 Rezasoltani, et al. (16)
2020
RCT Knee osteoarthritis ≥50 years old with KL grade 3 or 4 DPT: 30 participants
PT: 30 participants
BN: 30 participants
HA: 30 participants
DPT: 64.8 ± 5.8
PT: 70 ± 6.3
BN: 67.7 ± 7.3
HA: 66.1 ± 9.1
Baseline, 1st week, 4th week, 3rd month Injections performed 3 times, 1 month interval
8 mL 20% dextrose + 2 mL 2% lidocaine injected intra-articularly by USG guidance combined with exercise programme
PT group
Participants received 20 min of superficial heat using a hot pack. Then, TENS 80−100 Hz for 100−200 ms with maximum tolerable intensity. In addition, participants received pulsed ultrasound 1 MHz, 0.8−1.0 W/cm2, 50% duty cycle, 5 min per session combined with exercise programme
BN group
Single-dose injection
250 units of Dysport, equivalent to 100 units of botulinum neurotoxin type A diluted with
5 mL normal saline injected intra-articularly by USG guidance combined with exercise programme
HA group
The injections performed 3 times, 1 week interval.
2 mL HA (Hyalgan; Fidia Farmaceutici, Abano Terme, Italy) injected intra-articularly by USG guidance combined with exercise programme
Pain: VAS
Functional outcome: KOOS
Data was reported in linear model Score changes
DPT group
Pain
Baseline: 21.5 ± 5.9
3 months: 11.6 ± 6.8
Function, daily
Baseline: 39.6 ± 14.1
3 months: 22.2 ± 16.1
Function, sports
Baseline: 12.4 ± 2.0
3 months: 5.3 ± 4.3
Quality of life
Baseline: 12.2 ± 1.5
3 months: 5.5 ± 3.0
PT group
Pain
Baseline: 21.3 ± 5.0
3 months: 9.2 ± 5.3
Function, daily
Baseline: 34.7 ± 12.9
3 months: 8 ± 16.3
Function, sports
Baseline: 13.0 ± 1.8
3 months: 4.3 ± 3.8
Quality of life
Baseline: 10.2 ± 2.1
3 months: 3.8 ± 3.7
BN group
Pain
Baseline: 19.0 ± 6.5
3 months: 11.6 ± 6.7
Function, daily
Baseline: 36.8 ± 10.0
3 months: 8 ± 16.3
Function, sports
Baseline: 13.0 ± 1.8
3 months: 4.3 ± 3.8
Quality of life
Baseline: 10.2 ± 2.1
3 months: 3.8 ± 3.7
HA group
Pain
Baseline: 20.2 ± 6.6
3 months: 2.1 ± 9.9
Function, daily
Baseline: 33.7 ± 13.6
3 months: 2.8 ± 19.6
Function, sports
Baseline: 10.8 ± 1.9
3 months: 1.2 ± 5.7
Quality of life
Baseline: 9.5 ± 1.1
3 months: 1.7 ± 4.5
DPT and BN have similar effectiveness in reducing pain and improving functional outcomes.
DPT outperformed PT in reducing pain, but was not significantly different in improving functional outcomes.
DPT outperformed HA in both pain and functional outcomes.

RCT: randomized controlled trial; SD: standard deviation; DPT: dextrose prolotherapy; OA: osteoarthritis; KOA: knee osteoarthritis; KL: kellgren-lawrence; ACR: American college of rheumatology; DDH: developmental dysplasia of the hip; ACL: anterior cruciate ligament; BN: botulinum neurotoxin; PT: physical therapy; HA: hyaluronic acid; ACS: autologous conditioned serum; PRP: platelet-rich plasma; VAS: visual analogue scale; WOMAC: Western and Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index; USG: ultrasonography; TENS: transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation; HHS: harris hip score.