Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 20;10:e45448. doi: 10.2196/45448

Table 3.

Respondents’ mean (SD) ratings on perceptions of telerehabilitation use.

Rating scale All responses, mean (SD) Site, mean (SD) Professiona, mean (SD)


Canadian Dutch OTb PTc RTd
Experience (n=712) 3.0 (1.2) 3.1 (1.2) 2.9 (1.2) 3.3 (1.2) 2.7 (1.1) 2.0 (1.2)
Confidence (n=712) 3.0 (1.1) 3.0 (1.1) 3.1 (1.2) 3.2 (1.1) 2.8 (1.2) 2.4 (1.2)
Effectiveness (n=553) 3.3 (0.9) 3.3 (0.8) 3.3 (0.9) 3.4 (0.9) 3.2 (0.9) 3.6 (0.8)
Satisfaction (n=553) 3.3 (0.9) 3.3 (0.9) 3.4 (1) 3.4 (0.9) 3.2 (0.9) 3.4 (0.9)
TUQe—usability (n=524) 4.5 (1.1) 4.5 (1.1) 4.9 (0.9) 4.5 (1.1) 4.5 (1.1) 4.6 (1)
mTAMf—uptake (n=606) 4.9 (1) 4.8 (1) 5.3 (0.8) 4.9 (1) 4.8 (1.1) 4.9 (1)

aDietitians are not included in the table owing to the small number of respondents (6/723, 0.8%).

bOT: occupational therapist.

cPT: physical therapist.

dRT: respiratory therapist.

eTUQ: Telehealth Usability Questionnaire; scored on a 7-point Likert scale: 1=disagree to 7=agree.

fmTAM: modified Technology Acceptance Model; scored on a 7-point Likert scale: 1=totally disagree to 7=totally agree.