Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Immigr Minor Health. 2022 Mar 22;24(6):1526–1533. doi: 10.1007/s10903-022-01350-8

Table 3.

Impact of cultural orientations by cultural domain within caregiver-youth dyads on poor family functioning and susceptibility of substance use using the interaction, match/mismatch, and difference methods

Cultural Domain Poor family
functioning1
Substance use
susceptibility2
Substance use
susceptibility,
accounting for
family
functioning3
Hispanic/Latino Orientation4 OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Interaction Method
 Youth 0.96 (0.81, 1.13) 0.93 (0.73, 1.17) 0.93 (0.74, 1.18)
 Caregiver 1.08 (0.88, 1.32) 1.18 (0.88, 1.58) 1.18 (0.87, 1.59)
 Youth*Caregiver 0.95 (0.68, 1.32) 0.93 (0.59, 1.47) 0.95 (0.59, 1.51)
Match/Mismatch Method
 Matched REF REF REF
 Mismatched 0.94 (0.80, 1.12) 0.95 (0.75, 1.20) 0.96 (0.75, 1.21)
Difference Method
 Difference of 0.5 1.04 (0.95, 1.14) 1.11 (0.98, 1.25) 1.10 (0.98, 1.24)
 Difference of 1 1.09 (0.91, 1.31) 1.23 (0.97, 1.55) 1.22 (0.96, 1.55)
 Difference of 3 1.30 (0.76, 2.24) 1.85 (0.91, 3.76) 1.81 (0.88, 3.70)
Anglo Orientaiton5
Interaction Method
 Youth 0.74 (0.58, 0.95)* 1.20 (0.90, 1.61) 1.25 (0.92, 1.68)
 Caregiver 1.00 (0.83, 1.19) 1.03 (0.83, 1.27) 1.03 (0.83, 1.27)
 Youth*Caregiver 0.76 (0.52, 1.12) 1.44 (0.90, 2.30) 1.48 (0.92, 2.38)
Match/Mismatch Method
 Matched REF REF REF
 Mismatched 0.93 (0.78, 1.10) 1.17 (0.95, 1.43) 1.17 (0.95, 1.44)
Difference Method
 Difference of 0.5 0.95 (0.87, 1.04) 1.00 (0.90, 1.10) 1.00 (0.91, 1.11)
 Difference of 1 0.90 (0.76, 1.07) 0.99 (0.82, 1.21) 1.01 (0.83, 1.23)
 Difference of 3 0.74 (0.44, 1.24) 0.98 (0.54, 1.77) 1.02 (0.56, 1.85)

All models controlled for child’s age, gender, immigrant generation, Hispanic/Latino group, and ethnic identity as well as caregiver's highest level of education and ethnic identity

1

Multivariable logistic regression of family functioning regressed by ARSMA II subscale scores within caregiver-youth dyads, controlling for covariates.

2

Multivariable logistic regression of substance use susceptibility regressed by ARSMA II subscale scores within caregiver-youth dyads, controlling for covariates without family functioning.

3

Multivariable logistic regression of substance use susceptibility regressed by ARSMA II subscale scores within caregiver-youth dyads, controlling for covariates with family functioning.

4

ARSMA II Anglo orientation score

5

ARSMA II Hispanic/Latino orientation score