Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Feb 13.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Brain Res. 2022 Nov 4;438:114202. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2022.114202

Figure 7. Mean Weight (g) across CMS Treatment.

Figure 7.

Pictured are bar graphs with scatter plots representing mean weight (g) data (A-C). Data are represented as mean weight (g) and percent difference in weight change ±SEM. (A) A three-way mixed ANOVA (N=41) indicated that HAn animals weighed less than LAn animals overall [F (1, 108) = 10.83; ***p=0.0013]. (B) Mean weight (g) values collapsed across treatment and time to examine trait differences. At baseline, HAn rats weighed less than LAn rats (t=2.428, df=37.94; *p=0.02). (C) Percent difference in weight change between weeks one and three. HAn and LAn animals did not differ in their weight change from baseline to week 1 (t=0.9472, df=32.05; p=0.29).