Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Mar 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2019 Jul 3;141(28):11009–11018. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b13493

Table 1.

20 MHz Relaxivity Values for GdL1–3 ± Cu2+ and ± HSA and Kd Values for Binding of GdL1–3–Cu2+ with HSAa

in the absence of 0.6 mM HSA
in the presence of 0.6 mM HSA
r1 (mM−1 s−1)
r1 (mM−1 s−1)
GdLx no Cu2+ 1 equiv of
Cu2+*
% increase in
r1
Kd (GdL–Cu2+)b
(μM)
no Cu2+ 1 equiv of
Cu2+
% increase in
r1
Kd (GdL–Cu2+–HSA)c
(μM)
GdL1 4.7 ± 0.1 6.7 ± 0.1 43% 84 ± 10 6.1 ± 0.1
5.7 ± 0.1d
22.6 ± 0.2
15.4 ± 0.2d
270% 45 ± 3.1
GdL2 4.9 ± 0.2 5.5 ± 0.1 12% 895 ± 32 6.5 ± 0.2 14.5 ± 0.1 123% 59 ± 5
GdL3 4.8 ± 0.1 5.4 ± 0.2 12% 352 ± 9 6.3 ± 0.2 12.0 ± 0.2 90% 60 ± 10
a

All experiments were performed in 0.1 M MOPS buffer (pH 7.4) at 37 °C.

b

Kd(GdL–Cu2+) was determined by fluorescence titrations.

c

Kd(GdL–Cu2+–HSA) was determined by proton relaxation enhancement titrations.

d

Values measured in the presence of 0.6 mM mouse albumin.