Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 27;7(2):pkad003. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkad003

Table 2.

Adjusted logistic regression with patient-level predictors of prostate-specific antigen screeninga

Odds ratio (95% CI)
Age, y
 40-44 Ref
 45-49 1.88 (1.75 to 2.02)
 50-54 4.44 (4.15 to 4.74)
Education
 Less than high school Ref
 Graduated high school 1.44 (1.25 to 1.67)
 College/tech 1.69 (1.46 to 1.96)
 Graduated college/tech 1.87 (1.61 to 2.17)
Having health-care provider
 No or unsure Ref
 Yes 2.95 (2.72 to 3.19)
Health coverage
 No or unsure Ref
 Yes 1.85 (1.66 to 2.05)
Health status
 Excellent Ref
 Very good 0.97 (0.90 to 1.04)
 Good 0.90 (0.84 to 0.98)
 Fair 0.93 (0.84 to 1.04)
 Poor 1.10 (0.94 to 1.28)
Income
 <$15 000 Ref
 $15 000 to <$25 000 1.15 (0.99 to 1.33)
 $25 000 to <$35 000 1.15 (0.98 to 1.34)
 $35 000 to <$50 000 1.24 (1.07 to 1.43)
 ≥$50 000 1.52 (1.32 to 1.74)
Married
 Never married Ref
 Married/couple 1.26 (1.16 to 1.38)
  Other/divorced/widowed/separated 1.22 (1.11, 1.34)
Race
 White Ref
 Black 2.11 (1.79-2.47)
Smoking status
 Never smoker Ref
 Former smoker 1.04 (0.98 to 1.10)
 Current smoker 0.85 (0.79 to 0.92)
Weight status, BMI
 <25 Ref
 25-30 1.05 (0.98, 1.13)
 >30 1.13 (1.06, 1.22)
Year
 2012 Ref
 2014 0.81 (0.76 to 0.87)
 2016 0.66 (0.61 to 0.71)
 2018 0.41 (0.37 to 0.44)
 2020 0.36 (0.33 to 0.39)
a

Interaction terms and marginal analyses were reported separately in Tables 3 and 4. BMI = body mass index; CI = confidence interval.