Table 3.
Association of Dietary Inflammatory Index and Composite Dietary antioxidant Index with CIN2 or more severe lesions
| Regression models | Dietary index group | OR | 95 % CI | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dietary Inflammatory Index | ||||
| Model 1 | 1st tertile | Ref | ||
| 2nd tertile | 2·02 | 1·05, 3·88 | 0·035 | |
| 3rd tertile | 2·51 | 1·33, 4·73 | 0·004 | |
| Model 2 | 1st tertile | Ref | ||
| 2nd tertile | 2·15 | 1·11, 4·17 | 0·024 | |
| 3rd tertile | 3·14 | 1·50, 6·56 | 0·002 | |
| Composite Dietary Antioxidant Index | ||||
| Model 1 | 3rd tertile | Ref | ||
| 2nd tertile | 1·18 | 0·70, 2·01 | 0·532 | |
| 1st tertile | 1·12 | 0·62, 2·00 | 0·711 | |
| Model 2 | 3rd tertile | Ref | ||
| 2nd tertile | 1·20 | 0·69, 2·09 | 0·523 | |
| 1st tertile | 1·17 | 0·61, 2·23 | 0·637 | |
Results of the logistic regressions are reported as OR and 95 % CI.
Model 1 was adjusted for age and HPV status.
Model 2 was further adjusted for educational level, BMI, smoking status, parity, use of oral contraceptives and supplements. Reference groups (Ref) were the 1st tertile for the Dietary Inflammatory Index and the 3rd tertile for the Composite Dietary Antioxidant Index, respectively.