Table 3.
Total associations (c)* direct associations (c’) and indirect effects between parental education and water intake adjusted for significant mediators
Food parenting practices | Direct effect C’ path | Indirect effect A * B path | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Log-scale† | Normal – scale‡ | Log-scale | Normal – scale | ||||||
β | 95 % CI | β | 95 % CI | β | 95 % CI | β | 95 % CI | Mediation % | |
Positive FPP | |||||||||
HA fruit | 0·053 | 0·015, 0·091 | 0·042 | 0·053, 0·136 | 0·013 | 0·007, 0·021 | 0·022 | 0·008, 0·037 | 19·7 |
HA fresh fruit juice | 0·066 | 0·028, 0·104 | 0·064 | –0·030, 0·158 | 0·000 | –0·002, 0·001 | 0·001 | –0·002, 0·004 | – |
HA vegetables | 0·057 | 0·019, 0·095 | 0·045 | –0·049, 0·139 | 0·009 | 0·004, 0·014 | 0·019 | 0·009, 0·032 | 13·6 |
Modelling of fruit intake | 0·062 | 0·024, 0·100 | 0·054 | –0·039, 0·148 | 0·004 | 0·000, 0·008 | 0·010 | 0·000, 0·020 | 6·1 |
Negative FPP | |||||||||
HA sugar juices | 0·055 | 0·017, 0·092 | 0·039 | –0·055, 0·132 | 0·011 | 0·007, 0·016 | 0·025 | 0·016, 0·036 | 16·7 |
HA soft drinks | 0·047 | 0·009, 0·085 | 0·022 | –0·072, 0·117 | 0·019 | 0·013, 0·026 | 0·042 | 0·028, 0·057 | 28·8 |
HA salty snacks | 0·060 | 0·022, 0·098 | 0·055 | –0·039, 0·149 | 0·006 | 0·002, 0·009 | 0·009 | 0·001, 0·018 | 9·1 |
Permissiveness | 0·055 | 0·017, 0·092 | 0·041 | –0·052, 0·135 | 0·011 | 0·007, 0·016 | 0·023 | 0·013, 0·034 | 16·7 |
Use of food as reward | 0·056 | 0·018, 0·094 | 0·043 | –0·051, 0·137 | 0·010 | 0·006, 0·015 | 0·021 | 0·011, 0·033 | 15·2 |
FPP, food parenting practices; HA, home availability.
n 6705.
Single mediation analyses were adjusted for country and parental and children’s sex, age, and BMI.
Total effect (C pathway) of the association between parental education and water intake: β log = 0·066 (0·028, 0 104); β normal = 0·064 (-0·030, 0 158).
Results on the log-scale were used for determining statistical significance.
Results on the normal scale (servings/d) are used for interpretation purposes only.