Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 6;2013(12):CD002128. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002128.pub5

Sorensen worksite.

Methods Cluster RCT. Data were analysed at the level of the individual, allowing for clustering within worksites. The denominator used in this review is the worksite. The control group N is halved to take account of the two intervention arms.
Participants 22 worksites in USA randomised including 1359 employees at community health centres. 84% women, participants described as healthy and from racially and ethnically diverse backgrounds. No details regarding age.
Interventions See ''Sorensen work+family' for details of intervention. Follow‐up was at 19.5 months.
Outcomes Fruit and vegetable servings per day.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk See Table 1
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk See Table 1
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk See Table 1
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk See Table 1
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk See Table 1