Methods |
Cluster RCT. Data were analysed at the level of the individual, allowing for clustering within worksites. The denominator used in this review is the worksite. The control group N is halved to take account of the two intervention arms. |
Participants |
22 worksites in USA randomised including 1359 employees at community health centres. 84% women, participants described as healthy and from racially and ethnically diverse backgrounds. No details regarding age. |
Interventions |
See ''Sorensen work+family' for details of intervention. Follow‐up was at 19.5 months. |
Outcomes |
Fruit and vegetable servings per day. |
Notes |
|
Risk of bias |
Bias |
Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) |
Unclear risk |
See Table 1 |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) |
Unclear risk |
See Table 1 |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes |
Unclear risk |
See Table 1 |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes |
Unclear risk |
See Table 1 |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes |
Unclear risk |
See Table 1 |