Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 21;12:e44627. doi: 10.2196/44627

Table 1.

Eligible longitudinal aging studies for creating questionnaire answer pattern indices.

Study First wavea Sampling interval (years) Waves, n Minimum age (years) Approximate
sample size, n
Survey items (noteb), n Dementia status ascertained
Health and Retirement Study 2006 2 >6 50 12,000 >100 Tc
English Longitudinal Study of Ageing 2002 2 >8 50 8000 >100 Md, T
Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam 1992 3 >7 55 3100 >100 M
Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing 2010 2 >4 50 5000 >100 M, T
Memory and Aging Project 2004 1 >15 65 1700 60 Ce, M
Australian Longitudinal Study of Ageing 1992 3-4 >7 65 1100 80 M
Canberra Longitudinal Study 1990 4 4 70 1000 50 C, M
Sydney Memory and Aging Study 2005 2 >7 70 1000 80 C, M
Minority Aging Research Study 2005 1 >14 65 950 60 C, M
Einstein Aging Study 2004 1 >7 70 800 80 C, M
Swedish Adoption or Twin Study of Aging 1986 3 >7 50 600 >100 C, M
Octogenarian Twins Study 1991 2 5 79 300 80 C, M
Longbeach Longitudinal Study 1994 3 5 50 150 40 C
Mexican Health and Aging Study 2012 3 >3 50 15,000 40 T
Survey of Health, Aging, and Retirement in Europe 2004 2 >7 50 20,000 40 M, T

aYears indicate the first assessment wave to be used in the analyses.

bMinimum number of available individual questions from multi-item rating scales at each assessment occasion.

cT indicates that dementia status is ascertained by validated cutoffs from Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status [13,14].

dM indicates that dementia status is ascertained by Mini-Mental State Exam cutoffs [15,16].

eC indicates that dementia status is ascertained by formal clinical assessment.