Table 4.

The associations between quarters of subjective gradings of potential, and the associations of quarterly gradings and selection outcomes

Age	DF	Cramer’s V	Sig	Effect size
Q1 and Q2
U10	–	–	–	–
U13	2	0.89	0.03	Large
U14	2	0.98	0.01*	Large
U15	2	0.66	0.13	Large
U16	2	0.48	0.19	Large
Q1 and Q3
U10	2	0.38	0.57	Large
U13	2	0.51	0.15	Large
U14	2	0.57	0.12	Large
U15	2	0.73	0.07	Large
U16	2	0.73	0.02	Large
Q2 and Q3
U10	–	–	–	–
U13	2	0.45	0.27	Large
U14	2	0.62	0.08	Large
U15	2	0.66	0.14	Large
U16	2	0.31	0.86	Large
Q1 and selection status
U10	1	0.22	0.79	Small
U13	1	0.57	0.12	Large
U14	1	0.57	0.12	Large
U15	1	0.71	0.02	Large
U16	1	0.53	< 0.001*	Large
Q2 and selection status
U10	–	–	–	–
U13	1	0.57	0.12	Large
U14	1	0.62	0.08	Large
U15	1	0.65	0.04	Large
U16	1	0.13	0.90	Small
Q3 and selection status
U10	1	0.79	0.05	Large
U13	1	0.84	0.01*	Large
U14	1	1.00	< 0.001*	Perfect
U15	1	1.00	< 0.001*	Perfect
U16	1	1.00	< 0.001*	Perfect

Q1 = quarter 1, Q2 = quarter 2, Q3 = quarter 3

^* = significant outcome < 0.017 (with Bonferroni correction)