Skip to main content
Immune Network logoLink to Immune Network
. 2023 Feb 24;23(1):e6. doi: 10.4110/in.2023.23.e6

Gut Microbial Metabolites on Host Immune Responses in Health and Disease

Jong-Hwi Yoon 1,, Jun-Soo Do 1,2,, Priyanka Velankanni 3,, Choong-Gu Lee 3,4,, Ho-Keun Kwon 1,2,5,6,
PMCID: PMC9995988  PMID: 36911800

Abstract

Intestinal microorganisms interact with various immune cells and are involved in gut homeostasis and immune regulation. Although many studies have discussed the roles of the microorganisms themselves, interest in the effector function of their metabolites is increasing. The metabolic processes of these molecules provide important clues to the existence and function of gut microbes. The interrelationship between metabolites and T lymphocytes in particular plays a significant role in adaptive immune functions. Our current review focuses on 3 groups of metabolites: short-chain fatty acids, bile acids metabolites, and polyamines. We collated the findings of several studies on the transformation and production of these metabolites by gut microbes and explained their immunological roles. Specifically, we summarized the reports on changes in mucosal immune homeostasis represented by the Tregs and Th17 cells balance. The relationship between specific metabolites and diseases was also analyzed through latest studies. Thus, this review highlights microbial metabolites as the hidden treasure having potential diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets through a comprehensive understanding of the gut-immune interaction.

Keywords: Microbiota, Short-chain fatty acid, Bile acids, Polyamines, Immunomodulation

INTRODUCTION

Many microorganisms inhabit the intestine, and their critical role in maintaining immune homeostasis is well established. Microbial dysbiosis and associated alterations in microbiome-derived metabolites are often associated with dysregulated immune responses (1). Microbial metabolites are mainly synthesized or transformed by a complex network of interactions between dietary components and the host microbiota. The nutritional components consumed largely shape the intestinal niche and regulate the immune response via various microbial metabolites. Hence, improving current understanding regarding the synthesis of metabolites and their effects on the adaptive immune compartment, especially on the function and differentiation of T cells (known to be widely distributed in the intestinal tract), can be highly beneficial for developing better therapeutics. In this review, we specifically discussed 3 categories of metabolites: 1) those produced by the gut microbiota from dietary components, 2) those produced by the host and modified by the gut bacteria, and 3) those synthesized de novo by the gut bacteria. We analyzed the latest research trends by selecting short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), bile acids (BAs), and polyamines as representative metabolites of each group. We reviewed the representative metabolites and described the role of the microbiota in their synthesis. We then discussed the roles of these molecules in immune regulation, focusing on the function of the Tregs/Th17 cells. Finally, we summarized our perspective along with known facts regarding how these metabolites promote diseases by triggering changes such as that in the Tregs/Th17 balance. A comprehensive understanding of the gut bacteria-immune connection through bacterial derivatives is critical for finding novel drug targets and therapeutics against immunological disorders.

GUT MICROBIOTA-DERIVED METABOLITES

SCFAs

SCFAs are fatty acids with fewer than 6 carbon atoms. They are mainly produced through bacterial fermentation of dietary fibers in the colon and primarily constitute acetate, propionate, and butyrate. The conversion of dietary fibers to SCFAs involves several reactions mediated by various microbial enzymes (Fig. 1). Hence, the abundance of SCFAs is highly influenced by the host diet and gut microbiota composition (2). A growing body of evidence shows that SCFAs play an important role in health and onset of disease (3). Although production and absorption of SCFAs mainly proceed in gut, their systemic circulation makes it not only important to maintain intestinal homeostasis but also regulate various physiological processes of the host. These include energy expenditure, adipocyte metabolism, and especially immunological homeostasis (4,5,6). SCFAs regulate various immunological diseases, such as allergies, colitis, type 1 diabetes, cirrhosis, pathological bone loss, and even preeclampsia, by enhancing Tregs function, regulating the Tregs/Th17 balance, and inducing the migration of Tregs into pathological sites (7,8,9,10,11).

Figure 1. The biosynthetic pathways of SCFAs, BAs and polyamines along with the microorganisms involved are presented. Acetate, propionate and butyrate, the 3 main components of SCFAs, are produced by microbial fermentation of dietary fiber. Acetate is produced from pyruvate through Wood-Ljungdahl pathway which mediates reduction from CO2 to CO and subsequently converts acetyl-CoA and acetate. Propionate is synthesized through 3 different pathways: pyruvate is converted to succinate and lactate which finally forms propionate; propionate is generated via the propanediol pathway without passing through pyruvate; lactate from rumen microbial fermentation is converted to propionate through the acrylate pathway. Butyrate is synthesized by the formation of 2 molecules of acetyl-CoA, acetoacetyl-CoA, which is further converted to butyryl-CoA. In BA metabolism, cholesterol is converted to primary BAs, CA and CDCA, and conjugated with glycine or taurine in liver. After being secreted to the intestine, primary BAs are deconjugated through BSH produced by bacteria, such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium. In the subsequent step, 7α/7β-dehydroxylation occurs and the product is oxidized and epimerized by 7α/7β-HSDH. In the polyamine biosynthetic pathway, Putrescine is generated by the decarboxylation of ornithine catalyzed by the enzyme ODC. The synthesis of spermidine and spermine is mediated by the enzyme AdoMetDC, and the transferase enzymes SpmdS and SpmS.

Figure 1

CYP7A1, cholesterol 7 alpha-hydroxylase; CYP27A1, sterol 27-hydroxylase; CYP8B1, sterol 12-alpha-hydroxylase; CYP7B1, 25-hydroxycholesterol 7-alpha-hydroxylase; BSH, bile salt hydrolase; ADC, arginine decarboxylase; AdoMet, S-adenosyl-methionine; DCAdoMet, decarboxylation product of S-adenosyl-methionine; AdoMetDC, adenosyl-methionine decarboxylase; SpmdS, Spermidine synthase.

Role of the microbiota in SCFA metabolism

Anaerobic bacteria in colon mediate starch to SCFA conversion through specific enzymes, making them resistant to digestion and absorption in the small intestine (12). Acetate, a major SCFA, is produced by most enteric bacteria (including Akkermansia muciniphila, Bacteroides spp., Bifidobacterium spp., Prevotella spp., Ruminococcus spp., Blautia hydrogenotrophica, Clostridium spp., and Streptococcus spp.) from pyruvate using acetyl-CoA. The process takes place via the Wood-Ljungdahl pathway, which involves reduction of CO2 to formate or CO (13). Propionate is synthesized through 3 different pathways: the succinate, acrylate, and propanediol pathways, which require distinct microbes. The succinate pathway is activated by Bacteroides spp., Phascolarctobacterium succinatutens, Dialister spp., Veillonella spp., Megasphaera elsdenii, and Coprococcus catus. The propanediol pathway involves Salmonella spp., Roseburia inulinivorans, and Ruminococcus obeum (14). The synthesis of butyrate involves the fusion of 2 molecules of acetyl-CoA, followed by reduction to butyryl-CoA, which is finally converted to butyrate via 2 different pathways mediated by different types of gut microbiota: 1) the phosphotransacetylase/butyrate kinase route utilized by Coprococcus comes and Coprococcus eutactus, and 2) the butyryl-CoA:acetate CoA-transferase route utilized by Anaerostipes spp., C. catus, Eubacterium rectale, Eubacterium hallii, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, and Roseburia spp. (2).

BA metabolites

BA, a component of bile, produced by hepatocytes through the oxidation of cholesterol in the liver, acts as a detergent and supports the digestion of lipid components from food in the intestine (15). In humans, BAs are categorized into 2 groups: primary and secondary (Fig. 1). Primary BAs consist of cholic acid (CA) and chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA). In the classical pathway, 7α-hydroxylase (CYP7A1) is involved in production of primary BA, while in the alternative pathway, 27-hydroxylase (CYP27A1) takes part in producing primary BA from cholesterol (16). Mice produce α-muricholic acid (MCA) and β-MCA—primary BAs exclusive to them— from CDCA and ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) using the CYP2C70 (17). Primary BAs are conjugated with the amino acid glycine or taurine in the liver by amino acid N-acetyltransferase, and the liver secretes approximately 200−600 mg BAs per day in humans (18). The secreted BAs are stored in the gallbladder and passed through the duodenum after meals. Approximately 95% of the secreted BAs are reabsorbed in the terminal ileum and re-enter the liver via the enterohepatic circulation. About 15% of the conjugated BAs not reabsorbed in the terminal ileum enter the colon, where they are subjected to microbiota-mediated deconjugation and biotransformation into secondary BAs (19). This “gateway reaction” is carried out by bile salt hydrolase produced by the gut bacteria (20). Deconjugated CAs and CDCAs are further transformed into secondary BAs, such as deoxycholic acid (DCA) and lithocholic acid (LCA), respectively, by 7α-dehydroxylase. These BAs are involved in various physiological and pathological reactions, such as metabolism, inflammation, and immunity.

Role of the microbiota in BA metabolism

Microbiota plays a pivotal role in the conversion of primary BAs to secondary BAs in intestine. These secondary BAs recirculate to liver and regulate the synthesis of primary BAs by inhibiting transcription of enzymes like CYP7A1, CYP8B1 (21,22). Although deconjugated BAs, mainly DCA, are considered toxic to some susceptible microbiota (as they can disrupt the bacterial membrane), certain microbes are resistant to BA toxicity and are involved in their metabolism (20). As mentioned, bile salt hydrolase, which deconjugates primary BAs, is produced by bacteria, including Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus, Clostridium spp., and Bacteroides spp. (20). The subsequent BA metabolism is also mediated mainly by the gut microbiota. For instance, the oxidation and epimerization of hydroxyl groups (C3, C7, and C12) along with 7α/7β-dehydroxylation by the gut microbiota are major steps in BA metabolism. 7α- and 7β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases (7α/β-HSDHs) are the key enzymes involved in BA epimerization, which decreases the toxicity of CDCA. Clostridium absonum has both 7α- and 7β-HSDHs and converts CDCA to UDCA (23). Dehydroxylation of primary BA by 7α/7β-dehydroxylase is an essential step in the production of secondary BA. In Clostridium scindens, the BA-inducible operon contains 8 genes involved in 7α-dehydroxylase synthesis (24). 3α-dehydrogenation mediated by 3α-HSDH is an important step in the 7α-hydroxylation pathway. Clostridium perfringens, Peptostreptococcus productus, and Eggerthella lenta are typical bacteria producing 3α-HSDH (25). Furthermore, the Actinobacteria and Firmicutes phyla enable LCA to 3-oxoLCA conversion via the action of 3α-HSDH (26). 3-oxoLCA can be further converted to isoalloLCA by the Bacteroidetes spp. (27). Multiple microorganisms act synergistically to generate BA metabolites, and bio-transformed BAs influence the gut bacterial pool. For example, Aguirre et al. (28) demonstrated that 7α-dehydroxylated secondary BAs inhibit Clostridium difficile and showed possibility of biomarkers for C. difficile-resistant bowel environment. This complex relationship between the microbiota and BAs shapes the homeostatic balance in gut microenvironment (29).

Polyamines

Polyamines are cationic aliphatic amines that are multifunctional and ubiquitous, present in eukaryotic as well as prokaryotic organisms. Owing to their ionic characteristics, they interact with nucleic acids, ATP, acidic phospholipids, and specific types of proteins (30). Putrescine, spermidine, and spermine are the 3 major polyamines produced by mammalian cells. Polyamines play a crucial role in many fundamental biological functions, such as gene regulation, stress resistance, cell growth, survival, proliferation, and differentiation in health and disease (31,32,33). Intracellular polyamine levels are tightly regulated by various biosynthetic and salvage mechanisms (30). Putrescine can be synthesized from ornithine via ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) or alternatively from arginine via arginine decarboxylase to produce the intermediate agmatine, which is then converted to putrescine. Putrescine is converted into higher polyamines, such as spermidine and spermine, which are organic compounds composed of repeating amino groups, through a process called aminopropylation. The addition of aminopropyl groups to putrescine is catalyzed by spermidine synthase and spermine synthase in the presence of the aminopropyl donor decarboxylated S-adenosylmethionine (30,34).

Role of the microbiota in polyamine metabolism

Gut microbiota is the primary contributor of polyamine production in the intestine (35). This is a complicated process involving amino acid precursors as well as other intermediates, processed via various biosynthetic and degradation mechanisms along with specific transport systems (36). Sugiyama et al. (37) reported the role of dominant human-gut bacteria in producing polyamine from novel polyamine biosynthetic proteins and transporters. Another study has identified arginine decarboxylation as the dominant pathway for polyamine biosynthesis among common human gut microbiota species (38). Enterococcus faecalis, a prominent gut microorganism, metabolizes agmatine to putrescine via the agmatine deaminase pathway and has developed pH resistance to colonize the intestinal niche (39). Numerous bacteria can synthesize spermidine despite lacking orthologs of the polyamine biosynthetic enzymes, i.e., S-adenosyl-methionine decarboxylase and spermidine synthase. One example is Campylobacter jejuni, a human gut microbe that synthesizes spermidine via an alternative carboxyspermidine pathway (40). An isotope-labeling study suggested that multiple bacterial species produce putrescine through various cellular intermediates and enzymatic pathways (41). A novel hybrid system that monitors putrescine production demonstrated synergism between Bifidobacterium spp., E. faecalis, and Escherichia coli, both in vitro and in vivo (42). The synergistic supplementation of arginine with Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis LKM512 in mice increased polyamine putrescine levels. Moreover, it enhanced the expression of polyamine biosynthetic genes, such as those encoding arginine decarboxylase, agmatinase, agmatine deiminase, and N-carbamoyl-putrescine amidase (43). Another study also reported that the administration of LKM512 in Crj:CD-1 mice increased longevity by augmenting intestinal polyamine levels (44). Further, B. animalis subsp. lactis and arginine significantly increased polyamine concentration in the feces and serum (45). Metagenomic analysis of ovariectomized mice by Chevalier et al. (46) suggested that exposure to warmth increased the abundance of polyamine-producing genera, A. muciniphila, Bacteroides, and Alitsipes, and reduced the expansion of polyamine-degrading genera, Muribaculaceae and Lachnospirae. This is correlated with higher polyamine levels in the feces and cecum. A recent study involving the transplantation of Parabacteroides distasonis to mice reversed triptolide-induced testicular dysfunction by increasing spermine and putrescine levels in the testis and cecum through the upregulation of HSP70s (47). Dietary supplementation with guar gum enhances the proliferation of Bifidobacteria, and its associated synthesis of putrescine and spermidine in the cecum (48). Similarly, pectin-fed gnotobiotic rats produce putrescine and spermidine, mediated by Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and Fusobacterium varium (49). In addition, research has shown that changes in polyamine levels, such as increased spermidine, can also impact the composition and function of the gut microbiome in obese mice. Spermidine exerts a microbiota-dependent anti-obesity effect through expanding Lachnospiraceae NK4A136, resulting in improved gut barrier function (50).

Effect of metabolites on immune regulation

SCFAs are involved in the regulation of various immune cells (Fig. 2). At mucosal sites, microbe-associated molecular patterns are sensed and recognized by pattern recognition receptors such as TLRs on innate immune cells. SCFAs promote the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α, by activating NF-κB as part of the TLR response in epithelial cells (51). In addition, a recent study showed that butyrate enhances the antimicrobial function of macrophages by inhibiting histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3) activity, which modulates the metabolic states of macrophages and increases innate lymphoid cell 3 (ILC3)-mediated host defense as well as antimicrobial peptide production (52). In adaptive immunity, although SCFAs were initially recognized as immune-suppressive molecules that promote Tregs generation (53,54,55), the immunomodulatory properties of SCFAs are not only skewed toward tolerance but also toward boosting immunity against various types of microbes. This includes extracellular as well as intracellular bacteria, viruses, parasites and fungal infection (56,57,58). SCFAs have an impact on the development and function of both CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, however the processes differ significantly. In vitro treatment of CTLs and chimeric antigen receptor T cells with butyrate elevated the production of effector molecules, such as CD25, IFN-γ, and TNF-α together. Moreover, it significantly enhanced their anti-tumor activity in syngeneic murine melanoma and pancreatic cancer models by increasing mTOR and inhibiting class I HDAC activities (59). Furthermore, SCFAs upregulate IL-22 production in ILCs via G-protein coupled receptor 41 (GPR41) and inhibit HDACs, which mediate the upregulation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor and hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α). Finally, SCFA-mediated upregulation of HIF-1α and changes in the IL22 promoter locus enhance IL-22 production through ILCs and CD4+ T cells (60). Butyrate and propionate are sufficient to dampen antibody production by modulating essential steps in the intrinsic function of B cells. These include class-switch recombination, somatic hypermutation, and plasma cell differentiation by inhibiting HDAC3, indicating the potential immunomodulatory role of SCFAs in B cell function. However, further studies are necessary to elucidate their mode of action (61).

Figure 2. Metabolite-mediated expansion of Treg and Th17 cells in the intestinal niche is depicted. SCFAs, converted from dietary fiber, pass from gut epithelium to laminal propria through passive diffusion and via transporters (SLC16a1, SLC5a8). Naïve T cells capture SCFAs through GPR43, which mediates inhibition of HDAC6/9 and the subsequent acetylation of the foxp3 promoter region, finally differentiating into Tregs. SCFAs also induce Th17 cell differentiation in inflammatory conditions such as Citrobacter rodentium infection. SCFAs directly inhibit HDAC3 without passing through GPR41 and GPR43, which subsequently increases mTOR activity and finally induces RORγt expression. IsoalloLCA promotes production of mitoROS and induces the acetylation of CNS3 region of FOXP3 promoter, resulting in the upregulation of FOXP3 transcription. IsoDCA acts on FXR on DC to repress pro-inflammatory activity and upregulate anti-inflammatory transcription factors like SOCS1 and IkBα which increases Tregs differentiation. The 3-oxoLCA directly interacts with RORγt to interfere in its transcriptional activity, resulting in the inhibition of Th17 cell differentiation. The polyamine spermidine directs the autophagy-mediated differentiation of Treg cells, thereby establishing a regulatory environment in the gut. Spermidine induces IDO1-dependent immunosuppressive phenotype in DCs and thus can promote the expansion of Treg cells. Spermine exhibits an anti-inflammatory effect by means of macrophage-mediated IL-10 production and suppression of IL-12 and IFN-γ production.

Figure 2

SLC16a1, monocarboxylate transporter 1; SLC5a8, sodium-coupled monocarboxylate transporter 1; RORγt, RAR-related orphan receptor gamma; SOCS1, suppressor of cytokine signaling 1; CNS3, conserved non-coding sequence 3; Atg5, autophagy protein 5; IDO1, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1.

BAs modulate the host immune system via multiple mechanisms (Fig. 2). Firstly, their toxicity directly affects cellular and microbial viability (62), depending on their concentration, hydrophobicity, and conjugation status (63,64). Notably, taurine-conjugated BA is more hydrophilic and less toxic than glycine-conjugated BA (65). Secondly, nuclear and transmembrane BA receptors are the principal mediators of immune regulation by BAs (66). Although the nuclear farnesoid X receptor (FXR) was initially considered as an orphan receptor, a line of studies has shown it to be specific for BAs, including CDCA, CA, LCA, and DCA, for the modulation of many biological functions (67,68,69). FXR is also distributed across diverse tissues, such as the liver, intestine, and adrenal glands, and is known to be highly expressed in innate immune cells to regulate inflammation in murine colitis (70). Pregnane X receptor (PXR) is another orphan nuclear BA receptor for catatoxic compounds (71). PXR is activated by secondary BAs, such as LCA and DCA, to act as a cellular LCA sensor for the homeostatic concentration of toxic BAs at the transcriptional level (72). G protein-coupled bile acid receptor 1 (GPBAR1), also known as Takeda G-protein receptor 5 (TGR5), is a representative surface BA receptor expressed in intestine, liver, gallbladder, and adipose tissue (73), involved in immune regulation (74), BA homeostasis (75), energy expenditure, and glucose metabolism (76). Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2, a transmembrane receptor for conjugated BA, is a well-known BA receptor involved in various biological functions (77). BAs directly modulate immune response via these receptors (70). Conventionally, FXR is mainly expressed in the liver as well as intestine and is known to regulate the metabolism of BAs, glucose, and lipids. Recently, FXR has been shown to be expressed in various cell types and implicated in the progress of several inflammatory diseases including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (78,79). Gadaleta et al. (80) reported that the FXR agonist, INT-747, alleviates symptoms of dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced colitis (weight loss, rectal bleeding, and change in colon length) and protects against DSS-induced intestinal barrier permeability in mouse. Moreover, treatment with INT-747 significantly reduced the production of IFN-γ, IL-17, and TNF-α by human PBMCs and lamina propria mononuclear cells, stimulated by LPS and antibodies (anti-CD2, anti-CD28) respectively, from patients with IBD. In rodent hepatitis model, Mencarelli et al. (81) demonstrated that FXR acts directly on NKT cells in the liver and reduces production of osteopontin, an immunoregulatory cytokine, resulting in the attenuation of liver injury by hepatitis. GPBAR1 responds to various BAs, irrespective of the conjugation status, but mainly binds to deconjugated secondary BA. GPBAR1 is expressed in most tissues, including the intestine, liver, and biliary tract. Analogous to other BA receptors, GPBAR1 is also observed in various immune cells, such as monocytes, macrophages, DCs, and NK cells (70,81). Tauro-lithocholic acid (TLCA), a GPBAR1 agonist, promotes macrophage activation to encourage biliary epithelial cell proliferation following a liver injury (82). Additionally, macrophages can be reprogrammed from pro-inflammatory to anti-inflammatory phenotypes by TLCA (83). GPBAR1 also functions as a gatekeeper for liver NKT cell activation to suppress the differentiation of NKT cell into a type I NKT cell in murine immune-mediated hepatitis (84). Furthermore, GPBAR1 is critical for maintaining the integrity of intestinal barriers together with the suppression of M1-like macrophage and enhancement of M2-like macrophage in murine colitis (85,86). DCA is known to attenuate NF-κB-related pro-inflammatory cytokines in dendritic cells (DCs) to mitigate murine autoimmune uveitis (87). In the hepatic system, BAs inhibit LPS-induced cytokine expression in Kupffer cells via GPBAR1-cAMP dependent pathways, indicating their protective role in murine cholestatic liver disease (88). Recent studies have elucidated the pivotal roles of BAs in the development and function of T cells. BAs, specifically CDCA, DCA, and α-MCA, inhibit T-cell activation by perturbing the intracellular calcium concentration, eventually leading to deactivation of the NFAT signaling pathway in murine hepatitis B virus infection (89). Similarly, LCA inhibits Th1 cell activation via vitamin D receptor (VDR) signaling (90). Oral supplementation of BAs ameliorated IL-23-mediated psoriasiform dermatitis by inhibiting IL-17A production by T cells and decreasing CCL20 dependent chemo-trafficking of T cells in skin lesions (91). As BAs are directly secreted into the intestinal lumen, they show profound effects on the mucosal immune system. Recent studies have observed that BA metabolites produced by specific microbiota are involved in mucosal immunity via modulation of the Tregs/Th17 balance (26,92,93,94).

Polyamines play a critical role in bacterial pathogenicity and biofilm formation (95). Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, a pathogenic fungus that causes chytridiomycosis, uses spermidine and other polyamines to evade host immune surveillance (96). A recent study showed that polyamines facilitate the cellular attachment of coronaviruses and aid in viral replication, which is curbed upon the administration of DFMO, a polyamine synthesis inhibitor (97). Besides their role in microbial pathogenicity, polyamines also exhibit versatile roles in the activation of the immune response (Fig. 2). ODC in macrophages tempered antimicrobial M1 macrophage responses during Helicobacter pylori and Citrobacter rodentium infections in mice (98). Spermidine treatment improved the CD8+ T cell response of aged mice to influenza vaccination and infection by mediating autophagy (99). The administration of multi-strain probiotics to dogs with IBD and colonic polyposis resulted in potential anti-proliferative and anti-inflammatory effects, accompanied by an increase in putrescine, spermine, and ODC levels (100). In the central nervous system (CNS), ODC expressing neurons play a key role in the recruitment of immune cells to the CNS (101). The addition of spermine to LPS-stimulated human PBMCs resulted in post-transcriptional and polyamine oxidase-independent suppression of the synthesis of pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β (102). Spermine supplementation alleviated the inflammatory response by inducing IgM and anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10, TGF-β) but reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, and IFN-γ) in piglets (103). Spermine administration also protected mice against the development of carrageenan-induced acute edema (102) and lethal sepsis by attenuating HMGB1-induced inflammatory markers (104). Spermidine supplementation established metabolic dormancy in IFN-DCs and reduced the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in vitro and in vivo. The anti-inflammatory effects of spermidine are mediated by FOXO3 in DCs (105). In macrophages, the polyamine-eIF5A-hypusine axis controls OXPHOS-dependent alternative activation by modulating mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation but not aerobic glycolysis-dependent classical activation (106). Spermidine-treated RAW 267.4 cells, belonging to a well-known macrophage cell line, decrease the production of TNF-α and IL-1β. The anti-inflammatory effects of spermidine were confirmed by the significant decrease in inflammation-associated migration of neutrophils and macrophages in zebrafish larvae (107). Furthermore, spermidine reverses B cell senescence caused by aging. B cells from aged mice exhibit loss of the hypusinated EIF5A-TFEB-autophagy axis due to reduced spermidine levels, which can be restored by exogenous supplementation (108). Thus, polyamines have versatile roles in the immune system in health and disease.

Role of metabolites in Tregs/Th17 cell-mediated immune regulation

The reciprocal regulation between Tregs and Th17 cells is crucial for maintaining host immune homeostasis, and this regulation is achieved through microbial metabolite-immune interaction (109). In colonic lumen, SCFAs are mainly transported into the lamina propria through passive diffusion or transporters, such as sodium-coupled monocarboxylate transporter 1 and monocarboxylate transporter 1. These are expressed mainly in the apical and basolateral membranes of colonocytes (110,111). In lamina propria, the SCFAs interact with their receptors, including GPR41, GPR43, and GPR109A (112). Although GRP41 and GPR43 are activated by all SCFAs, GPR109A is selectively activated by butyrate (113). SCFAs are expressed in various tissues and cell types, including adipose tissue, intestinal epithelial cells, and immune cells, indicating their immune-modulatory roles (114). Although there is still no detailed molecular mechanism of their immune-modulatory function, a line of studies has reported that SCFAs can modulate colonic Treg cells via GPR43, which mediates the inhibition of HDACs. This in turn loosens the intronic CNS region of the Foxp3 locus leading to the upregulation of Foxp3 expression and Tregs differentiation in the colon (53,54,55). Furthermore, we have recently observed that probiotics-derived propionate in gut heightens not only the proportion but also effector function of Tregs during skin allergies (115). The physiological roles of SCFAs as HDAC inhibitors were demonstrated by supplementing the diet of germ-free mice with acetate, butyrate, and propionate, which increased histone acetylation leading to transcriptome changes in various tissues (116). At molecular level, the potential mechanism by which SCFAs inhibit HDAC activity involves competitive inhibition of the substrate from binding to the catalytic site of HDACs (117). A pioneering study regarding the effect of SCFAs on the polarization of CD4+ T cells has demonstrated that SCFAs affect the differentiation of not only Tregs but also Th17 cells (118). Interestingly, SCFAs do not act as Tregs cell inducers in certain Th polarization culture conditions with distinct cytokine milieu, but boost the polarization of CD4+ T cells, especially into Th1/17 cells (118). Cancer patients undergoing anti-CTLA4 treatments showed a correlation between the worst clinical outcomes and high blood butyrate levels and Tregs cell proportion, in which butyrate indirectly dampens T cell-mediated anti-tumor immunity by inhibiting the anti-CTLA4-mediated upregulation of CD80/86 on DCs (119). Furthermore, HDAC inhibition by SCFAs leads to the generation of Th1, Th17, and IL-10-producing T cells through the acetylation of the p70 S6 kinase and phosphorylation of rS6, which is a crucial component of the mTOR pathway. In summary, SCFAs modulate T cell homeostasis by balancing effector and Tregs, depending on the immunological milieu.

Several recent studies have shown specific effects of BA metabolites on Tregs differentiation (27,92,93,94). IsoalloLCA increases the differentiation of Tregs through the production of mitochondrial ROS (mitoROS), which leads to increased expression of FOXP3 and Tregs differentiation independent of the microbiome composition (93). At the molecular level, isoalloLCA activates the nuclear hormone receptor NR4A1 to facilitate a permissive chromatin structure in the promoter region of the transcription factor FOXP3 (27). Together with isoalloLCA, isoDCA after microbial epimerization diminishes immunostimulatory properties of DCs via FXR. This promotes Foxp3 induction and Tregs differentiation in CNS1-dependent manner, indicating isoDCA-induced extrathymic differentiation of RAR-related orphan receptor gamma (RORγt)+ Tregs cell (94). The 3-oxoLCA directly interacts with RORγt, which is a key Th17 cell-promoting transcription factor, to inhibit Th17 cell differentiation. Treatment of 3-oxoLCA ameliorated the severity of murine acute enteritis mouse model (93).

A recent study showed that polyamine metabolism is a central determinant in the regulation of the helper T cell differentiation. T cell-specific depletion of ODC or deoxyhypusine hydroxylase promotes widespread epigenetic remodeling driven by alterations in histone acetylation and a re-wired tricarboxylic acid cycle. This leads to severe intestinal inflammation, implicating polyamine metabolism in the maintenance of Th lineage fidelity (120). Furthermore, polyamine metabolism is a decisive factor in Th17 pathogenicity, which is associated with arginine and downstream polyamine metabolism. Briefly, chemical and genetic perturbation of polyamine metabolism induces the transcriptome/epigenome of Th17 cell to move toward a Treg-like state, so as to inhibit Th17 but promote Treg differentiation (121). Along with pro-inflammatory function, polyamines can evoke an immune regulatory environment. Polyamines trigger an IDO1-dependent immunosuppressive property in DCs by activating IDO1-phosphorylating Src kinase (122). Spermidine potentiates the differentiation of both murine and human naïve CD4+ T cells toward regulatory phenotypes and controls inflammation in the murine colitis model in an Atg5-dependent manner. This indicates the pivotal role of autophagy in immune regulation by spermidine (123).

Effect of microbial metabolites on diseases and clinical applications

Numerous bodies of evidence show that SCFAs play an important role in the maintenance of health as well as the development of disease (Table 1). Using multi-omics with a multi-organ model of ulcerative colitis ex vivo, Trapecar et al. (124) showed the paradoxical roles of microbiota-derived SCFAs in modulating the immune system. The SCFAs mitigated innate inflammation in the absence of CD4+ T cells but exacerbated CD4+ T cell-mediated acute inflammation through metabolic reprograming, leading to gut-barrier disruption and hepatic injury. Another multiomics-based study on patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)-related cirrhosis, with or without hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), revealed that the higher SCFA-producing bacteria in NAFLD-HCC patients elicit the expansion of Tregs cells and attenuation of CD8+ T cells compared to those in healthy controls (125). In a murine model of experimental autoimmune prostatitis (EAP), supplementation with propionate lowered the susceptibility to EAP induction and corrected the Th17/Tregs cell imbalance independent of the gut microbiome (126). Thus, SCFAs have shown their potent immune-regulatory functions not only in mucosal but also systemic immune system where they mainly modulate the Th17/Tregs cell balance.

Table 1. Classification of known disease related metabolites.

Type of metabolite Receptors/Molecular targets Related disease Reference
SCFA - Increased in NAFLD-HCC patients compared to NAFLD only patients (125)
Decreased in IBD patients (127,128)
Decreased in type 1 diabetes patients (162)
Decreased in allergic infants (163)
BA
Primary
CA FXR, GGPBAR1, chimeric antigen receptor Relatively increased in IBD, accelerate LN metastasis of tumor (taurine conjugated) (138,164)
CDCA FXR, GPBAR1, PXR, vascular endothelial growth factor Relative increased in IBD patients, liver cancer, ameliorates Alzheimer’s disease (164,165)
Secondary
DCA FXR, PXR, VDR, TGR5 Decreased in IBD patients, uveitis (suppressive), accelerate LN metastasis of tumor (taurine conjugated) (138,164,166)
LCA FXR, PXR, VDR, TGR5 Decreased in IBD patients, psoriasis (suppressive), uveitis (suppressive), increased in coronary disease, breast cancer (suppressive) (91,164,166,167,168)
UDCA FXR, GPBAR1 NAFLD (improve disease status) (169,170,171,172)
Derivatives of 2nd BA
3-oxoLCA PXR, VDR, RORγt Decreased in IBD patients (26,93)
IsoalloLCA NR4A1 Decreased in IBD patients (27)
IsoDCA FXR Unknown (94)
IsoLCA RORγt Decreased in IBD patients (26)
Polyamines
Spermine - Increased level exerts anti-obesity effect (50)
Spermidine and other polyamines - Pathogenic fungus uses the metabolites to evade host immune surveillance in chytridiomycosis (96)
Putrescine, spermidine, ODC - Increase in levels associated with anti-inflammation with IBD and colonic polyposis (100)
Spermine - Protect development of carrageenan-induced acute edema and lethal sepsis (102,104)
Spermidine Atg5-dependent manner Controls inflammation in the murine colitis (123)
Spermidine AMPK, HIF-1α Induces autophagy-mediated M2 polarization and ameliorate murine IBD (148)
L-arginine Arg1 Protection from colitis (149)
Spermidine Antioxidant activity Alleviated the severity of murine EAE (150)
Spermidine Arg1 Reverses EAE progression (151)
Spermidine, spermine, N1-acetylspermidine, N1-acetylcadaverine - Reduced plasma levels in SLE (152)
Urinary polyamine, putrescine - Elevated levels to the activity and progression of RA (154,155)

Although there are plenty of pre-clinical studies regarding effects of SCFAs on immunological disorder, clinical trials of SCFAs on counterparts still need to be done. Representatively, clinical studies evaluating effects of SCFAs mixture on IBD patients showed improved clinical outcome in SCFAs-treated patients compared to placebo (127,128). Molecularly, SCFAs treatment inhibits nuclear translocation of NF-κB and macrophage and LPS-induced cytokine expression of lamina propria and peripheral blood macrophage (129).

Primary BAs are steroidal chemicals generated in the liver from cholesterol and released into the gut lumen after a meal, where they aid in the absorption of dietary fatty acids and vitamins (25). Once in the GI tract, these molecules are chemically transformed by the resident microbiota to generate a family of metabolites known as secondary BAs (25). Numerous studies have revealed that both primary and secondary BAs affect host physiopathology in health and disease (27,130,131,132,133,134,135) (Table 1). In murine psoriatic dermatitis, oral or intravenous administration of LCA ameliorated the symptoms of psoriasiform dermatitis by inhibiting IL-17a production and RORγt transcription in CD3+ T cells cultured with IL-23 via FXR and GPBAR1 (91). Uveitis, commonly accompanied by autoimmune diseases, such as Behçet’s disease, is also related to BA metabolites. Using metagenomic analysis, a specific dysbiosis disease was identified in the stools of patients with Behçet’s disease, which is capable of exaggerating experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU) in murine models (136). Treatment with DCA and LCA mitigates murine EAU by inhibiting the activation of CD11c+ MHCII+ DCs, which repress the induction of Th1 and Th17 cells through TGR5 signaling (87). BAs are considered a double-edged sword in tumor progression and immunity. In a mouse cancer model, both tauro-β-MCA (T-βMCA) and CDCA upregulated CXCL16 expression in liver sinusoidal endothelial cells to accumulate CXCR6+ NKT cells in the liver, resulting in the inhibition of liver metastasis (137). However, BAs can also promote cancer progression by acting directly on tumor cells. Using comparative transcriptomics and metabolomics of primary and lymph node (LN)-metastatic tumors in mice, the specific accumulation of several bioactive BAs was observed in metastatic LNs. These BAs activate yes-associated protein in tumor cells via the nuclear VDR to intensify FAO signaling pathways leading to LN metastasis (138). In addition, natural FXR antagonists, T-βMCA and DCA, promote cancer stem cell proliferation together with the accumulation of DNA damage in Lgr5-expressing cancer stem cells, resulting in the progression of murine colorectal cancer (139). In summary, BAs play a pathophysiological role in various diseases. Thus, understanding their mode of action is important in order to uncover novel diagnostics and therapeutics for immune disorders, such as severe inflammatory diseases, autoimmune diseases, and cancer.

There are several clinical trials to use BAs in various disease, including liver and non-liver diseases regardless of its effect on immune system (13,140,141,142,143,144). UDCA was used in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and improved liver function test in serum. But it didn’t increase survival rate and several serious adverse effects were reported (145). Mousa et al. (146) reported that BA profile score can be used for biomarker to predict hepatic decompensation in PSC patients. Obeticholic acid, semisynthetic derivative of CDCA, is agonist of both FXR and GPBAR1. Initially, it was tried in primary biliary cholangitis for treatment and biomarkers for disease progression (147). Nowadays, it also attempted to use in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (143).

Polyamines are essential for cell growth and proliferation as well as tissue regeneration. Increasing evidence indicates the pivotal role of these molecules in the physiopathogenesis of multiple diseases (Table 1). For instance, spermidine induces AMPK-, HIF-1α-, and autophagy-mediated M2 polarization, and spermidine-treated macrophages ameliorate murine IBD (148). Arginase 1 alters the microbiome and augments the degree of inflammation in IBD patients. A murine colitis model with Arg1 knockout mice, partially mimicking human IBD patients, showed necessity of L-arginine for protection from colitis, indicating L-arginine metabolism as a potential target for treatment of IBD (149). Furthermore, oral administration of spermidine effectively alleviated the severity of murine EAE, especially EAE-induced optic neuritis, through its antioxidant activity (150). Spermidine also induces the inhibitory macrophages expressing arginase-1 (but not IL-1β, IL-12, and CD80), which reverses EAE progression in an Arg1-dependent manner (151). Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have specific alterations in the polyamine catabolism in serum, showing reduced plasma levels of spermidine, spermine, N1-acetylspermidine, and N1-acetylcadaverine but elevated cadaverine levels, which is associated with disease activity (152). This suggests that changes in polyamine patterns can act as potential biomarkers for assessing disease activity in SLE (152). Spermine can inhibit the binding of SLE-related anti-DNA antibodies in plasma to calf thymus DNA in a dose-dependent manner and can also displace the antibodies in preformed immune complexes (153). Elevated urinary polyamine levels can be linked to the activity and progression of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (154). Higher putrescine levels are observed in the synovial fluid of RA patients compared to that of healthy controls (155). Daily supplementation of spermine significantly ameliorated cartilage and bone destruction in the synovial joints of rats with collagen-induced arthritis (156). Furthermore, the enhanced expression of polyamine-modulated factor 1-binding protein 1 and spermidine/spermine N1-acetyltransferase promotes the catabolism and recycling of polyamines. This leads to global DNA hypomethylation in the synovial fibroblasts of RA patients (157), indicating the polyamine recycling pathway as part of a novel epigenetic therapy for RA (158). Chemical inhibition of polyamine pathways has shown immune-modulatory function in various inflammatory disorders. For instance, methylthioadenosine, a spermine synthase inhibitor, ameliorates murine experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) by suppressing the production of IFN-γ, TNF-α, and inducible nitric oxide synthase but increasing the production of IL-10 in a dose-dependent manner (159,160). Simultaneous ablation of de novo synthesis and the salvage pathway by AMXT 1501 and DFMO confers protection against the development of EAE, which is substantiated by the reduction of IL-17+ CD4+ T cells mainly via arginine in the CNS (161). The complex integration of multiple mechanisms dictates the immune stimulatory or regulatory roles of the polyamines under homeostatic and pathological conditions.

CONCLUDING REMARKS

Gut microbiota intercommunicates with the mucosal immune system primarily through its metabolites to maintain immunological homeostasis. Among the various microbial metabolites, accumulating evidence has specially focused on the immune-modulatory function of SCFAs, BAs, and polyamines. The activities of SCFA and BA metabolites are mainly mediated through various receptors. However, polyamines, which are produced extracellularly and transported into cells, regulate the metabolic pathways in versatile immune populations to impact the host’s health and disease status. These interactions may allow immune cells to integrate the nutritional supplementation from tissues with the optimal programing of their metabolic status. The benefits of targeting Tregs/Th17 balance can be ambiguous. Nonetheless, understanding the role of metabolomes, particularly in controlling Tregs or Th17 cell activity, is critical for regulating physiopathology in homeostatic and inflammatory circumstances through microbial metabolites. Understanding immune modulation via microbial metabolites can be important in this regard. In fact, specific metabolites and/or metabolic signatures could be utilized as biomarkers as well as potential therapeutic targets for developing innovative therapies against various intractable immune disorders. These include allergies, autoimmune diseases, and cancers. Thus, our review highlights the need for more research to decode the microbial metabolite-immune interactions and their physiopathological outcomes at a systematic level.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was supported by grants from the Korea Health Technology R&D project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (HV20C0172 and HV22C0246), “Team Science Award” of Yonsei University College of Medicine (6-2021-0194), National Research Foundation of Korea (2021R1C1C1007040), and an intramural grant of Korea Institute of Science and Technology (2Z06662 and 2V0917K). Figures have been created with BioRender.

Abbreviations

BA

bile acid

CA

cholic acid

CDCA

chenodeoxycholic acid

CNS

central nervous system

DC

dendritic cell

DCA

deoxycholic acid

DSS

dextran sodium sulfate

EAE

experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

EAP

experimental autoimmune prostatitis

EAU

experimental autoimmune uveitis

FXR

farnesoid X receptor

TGR5

Takeda G-protein receptor 5

GPBAR1

G protein-coupled bile acid receptor 1

GPR

G-protein coupled receptor

mitoROS

mitochondrial reactive oxygen species

HCC

hepatocellular carcinoma

HDAC

histone deactylase

HIF

hypoxia-inducible factor

HSDH

hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases

IBD

inflammatory bowel disease

ILC

innate lymphoid cell

LCA

lithocholic acid

LN

lymph node

MCA

muricholic acid

NAFLD

non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

ODC

ornithine decarboxylase

PSC

primary sclerosing cholangitis

PXR

pregnane X receptor

RA

rheumatoid arthritis

RORγt

RAR-related orphan receptor gamma

SCFA

short-chain fatty acid

SLE

systemic lupus erythematosus

TLCA

tauro-lithocholic acid

T-βMCA

tauro-β-muricholic acid

UDCA

ursodeoxycholic acid

VDR

vitamin D receptor

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Author Contributions:
  • Conceptualization: Kwon HK, Yoon JH, Do JS, Velankanni P, Lee CG.
  • Supervision: Kwon HK, Lee CG.
  • Visualization: Kwon HK, Yoon JH, Do JS.
  • Writing - original draft: Kwon HK, Yoon JH, Do JS, Velankanni P, Lee CG.

References

  • 1.Yang W, Cong Y. Gut microbiota-derived metabolites in the regulation of host immune responses and immune-related inflammatory diseases. Cell Mol Immunol. 2021;18:866–877. doi: 10.1038/s41423-021-00661-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Koh A, De Vadder F, Kovatcheva-Datchary P, Bäckhed F. From dietary fiber to host physiology: short-chain fatty acids as key bacterial metabolites. Cell. 2016;165:1332–1345. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.van der Hee B, Wells JM. Microbial regulation of host physiology by short-chain fatty acids. Trends Microbiol. 2021;29:700–712. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2021.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chambers ES, Viardot A, Psichas A, Morrison DJ, Murphy KG, Zac-Varghese SE, MacDougall K, Preston T, Tedford C, Finlayson GS, et al. Effects of targeted delivery of propionate to the human colon on appetite regulation, body weight maintenance and adiposity in overweight adults. Gut. 2015;64:1744–1754. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Samuel BS, Shaito A, Motoike T, Rey FE, Backhed F, Manchester JK, Hammer RE, Williams SC, Crowley J, Yanagisawa M, et al. Effects of the gut microbiota on host adiposity are modulated by the short-chain fatty-acid binding G protein-coupled receptor, Gpr41. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:16767–16772. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808567105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Park JW, Kim HY, Kim MG, Jeong S, Yun CH, Han SH. Short-chain fatty acids inhibit staphylococcal lipoprotein-induced nitric oxide production in murine macrophages. Immune Netw. 2019;19:e9. doi: 10.4110/in.2019.19.e9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhu Z, Zhu B, Hu C, Liu Y, Wang X, Zhang J, Wang F, Zhu M. Short-chain fatty acids as a target for prevention against food allergy by regulatory T cells. JGH Open. 2019;3:190–195. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhou L, Zhang M, Wang Y, Dorfman RG, Liu H, Yu T, Chen X, Tang D, Xu L, Yin Y, et al. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii produces butyrate to maintain Th17/Treg balance and to ameliorate colorectal colitis by inhibiting histone deacetylase 1. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2018;24:1926–1940. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izy182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Huang J, Pearson JA, Peng J, Hu Y, Sha S, Xing Y, Huang G, Li X, Hu F, Xie Z, et al. Gut microbial metabolites alter IgA immunity in type 1 diabetes. JCI Insight. 2020;5:e135718. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.135718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Juanola O, Piñero P, Gómez-Hurtado I, Caparrós E, García-Villalba R, Marín A, Zapater P, Tarín F, González-Navajas JM, Tomás-Barberán FA, et al. Regulatory T cells restrict permeability to bacterial antigen translocation and preserve short-chain fatty acids in experimental cirrhosis. Hepatol Commun. 2018;2:1610–1623. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hu M, Eviston D, Hsu P, Mariño E, Chidgey A, Santner-Nanan B, Wong K, Richards JL, Yap YA, Collier F, et al. Decreased maternal serum acetate and impaired fetal thymic and regulatory T cell development in preeclampsia. Nat Commun. 2019;10:3031. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10703-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.den Besten G, van Eunen K, Groen AK, Venema K, Reijngoud DJ, Bakker BM. The role of short-chain fatty acids in the interplay between diet, gut microbiota, and host energy metabolism. J Lipid Res. 2013;54:2325–2340. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R036012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rey FE, Faith JJ, Bain J, Muehlbauer MJ, Stevens RD, Newgard CB, Gordon JI. Dissecting the in vivo metabolic potential of two human gut acetogens. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:22082–22090. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.117713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Louis P, Hold GL, Flint HJ. The gut microbiota, bacterial metabolites and colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014;12:661–672. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chiang JY. Bile acid metabolism and signaling. Compr Physiol. 2013;3:1191–1212. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c120023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Russell DW. The enzymes, regulation, and genetics of bile acid synthesis. Annu Rev Biochem. 2003;72:137–174. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.72.121801.161712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Molinaro A, Wahlström A, Marschall HU. Role of bile acids in metabolic control. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2018;29:31–41. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2017.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fuchs CD, Trauner M. Role of bile acids and their receptors in gastrointestinal and hepatic pathophysiology. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;19:432–450. doi: 10.1038/s41575-021-00566-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Di Ciaula A, Garruti G, Lunardi Baccetto R, Molina-Molina E, Bonfrate L, Wang DQ, Portincasa P. Bile acid physiology. Ann Hepatol. 2017;16:s4–ss14. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0010.5493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Guzior DV, Quinn RA. Review: microbial transformations of human bile acids. Microbiome. 2021;9:140. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01101-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sayin SI, Wahlström A, Felin J, Jäntti S, Marschall HU, Bamberg K, Angelin B, Hyötyläinen T, Orešič M, Bäckhed F. Gut microbiota regulates bile acid metabolism by reducing the levels of tauro-beta-muricholic acid, a naturally occurring FXR antagonist. Cell Metab. 2013;17:225–235. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chiang JY. Negative feedback regulation of bile acid metabolism: impact on liver metabolism and diseases. Hepatology. 2015;62:1315–1317. doi: 10.1002/hep.27964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ridlon JM, Harris SC, Bhowmik S, Kang DJ, Hylemon PB. Consequences of bile salt biotransformations by intestinal bacteria. Gut Microbes. 2016;7:22–39. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2015.1127483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ridlon JM, Hylemon PB. Identification and characterization of two bile acid coenzyme A transferases from Clostridium scindens, a bile acid 7α-dehydroxylating intestinal bacterium. J Lipid Res. 2012;53:66–76. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M020313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ridlon JM, Kang DJ, Hylemon PB. Bile salt biotransformations by human intestinal bacteria. J Lipid Res. 2006;47:241–259. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R500013-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Paik D, Yao L, Zhang Y, Bae S, D’Agostino GD, Zhang M, Kim E, Franzosa EA, Avila-Pacheco J, Bisanz JE, et al. Human gut bacteria produce TH17-modulating bile acid metabolites. Nature. 2022;603:907–912. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04480-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Li W, Hang S, Fang Y, Bae S, Zhang Y, Zhang M, Wang G, McCurry MD, Bae M, Paik D, et al. A bacterial bile acid metabolite modulates Treg activity through the nuclear hormone receptor NR4A1. Cell Host Microbe. 2021;29:1366–1377.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2021.07.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Aguirre AM, Yalcinkaya N, Wu Q, Swennes A, Tessier ME, Roberts P, Miyajima F, Savidge T, Sorg JA. Bile acid-independent protection against Clostridioides difficile infection. PLoS Pathog. 2021;17:e1010015. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Urdaneta V, Casadesús J. Interactions between bacteria and bile salts in the gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary tracts. Front Med (Lausanne) 2017;4:163. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Li J, Meng Y, Wu X, Sun Y. Polyamines and related signaling pathways in cancer. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20:539. doi: 10.1186/s12935-020-01545-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Larqué E, Sabater-Molina M, Zamora S. Biological significance of dietary polyamines. Nutrition. 2007;23:87–95. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2006.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Thomas T, Thomas TJ. Polyamines in cell growth and cell death: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic applications. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2001;58:244–258. doi: 10.1007/PL00000852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nakanishi S, Cleveland JL. Polyamine homeostasis in development and disease. Med Sci (Basel) 2021;9:28. doi: 10.3390/medsci9020028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Moinard C, Cynober L, de Bandt JP. Polyamines: metabolism and implications in human diseases. Clin Nutr. 2005;24:184–197. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2004.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tofalo R, Cocchi S, Suzzi G. Polyamines and gut microbiota. Front Nutr. 2019;6:16. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2019.00016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Igarashi K, Kashiwagi K. Characteristics of cellular polyamine transport in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2010;48:506–512. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sugiyama Y, Nara M, Sakanaka M, Gotoh A, Kitakata A, Okuda S, Kurihara S. Comprehensive analysis of polyamine transport and biosynthesis in the dominant human gut bacteria: potential presence of novel polyamine metabolism and transport genes. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2017;93:52–61. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2017.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Burrell M, Hanfrey CC, Murray EJ, Stanley-Wall NR, Michael AJ. Evolution and multiplicity of arginine decarboxylases in polyamine biosynthesis and essential role in Bacillus subtilis biofilm formation. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:39224–39238. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.163154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Suárez C, Espariz M, Blancato VS, Magni C. Expression of the agmatine deiminase pathway in Enterococcus faecalis is activated by the AguR regulator and repressed by CcpA and PTSMan systems. PLoS One. 2013;8:e76170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hanfrey CC, Pearson BM, Hazeldine S, Lee J, Gaskin DJ, Woster PM, Phillips MA, Michael AJ. Alternative spermidine biosynthetic route is critical for growth of Campylobacter jejuni and is the dominant polyamine pathway in human gut microbiota. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:43301–43312. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.307835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nakamura A, Ooga T, Matsumoto M. Intestinal luminal putrescine is produced by collective biosynthetic pathways of the commensal microbiome. Gut Microbes. 2019;10:159–171. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2018.1494466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kitada Y, Muramatsu K, Toju H, Kibe R, Benno Y, Kurihara S, Matsumoto M. Bioactive polyamine production by a novel hybrid system comprising multiple indigenous gut bacterial strategies. Sci Adv. 2018;4:eaat0062. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aat0062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kibe R, Kurihara S, Sakai Y, Suzuki H, Ooga T, Sawaki E, Muramatsu K, Nakamura A, Yamashita A, Kitada Y, et al. Upregulation of colonic luminal polyamines produced by intestinal microbiota delays senescence in mice. Sci Rep. 2014;4:4548. doi: 10.1038/srep04548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Matsumoto M, Kurihara S, Kibe R, Ashida H, Benno Y. Longevity in mice is promoted by probiotic-induced suppression of colonic senescence dependent on upregulation of gut bacterial polyamine production. PLoS One. 2011;6:e23652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Matsumoto M, Kitada Y, Naito Y. Endothelial function is improved by inducing microbial polyamine production in the gut: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Nutrients. 2019;11:11. doi: 10.3390/nu11051188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Chevalier C, Kieser S, Çolakoğlu M, Hadadi N, Brun J, Rigo D, Suárez-Zamorano N, Spiljar M, Fabbiano S, Busse B, et al. Warmth prevents bone loss through the gut microbiota. Cell Metab. 2020;32:575–590.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.08.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhao Q, Huang JF, Cheng Y, Dai MY, Zhu WF, Yang XW, Gonzalez FJ, Li F. Polyamine metabolism links gut microbiota and testicular dysfunction. Microbiome. 2021;9:224. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01157-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Noack J, Kleessen B, Proll J, Dongowski G, Blaut M. Dietary guar gum and pectin stimulate intestinal microbial polyamine synthesis in rats. J Nutr. 1998;128:1385–1391. doi: 10.1093/jn/128.8.1385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Noack J, Dongowski G, Hartmann L, Blaut M. The human gut bacteria Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and Fusobacterium varium produce putrescine and spermidine in cecum of pectin-fed gnotobiotic rats. J Nutr. 2000;130:1225–1231. doi: 10.1093/jn/130.5.1225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ma L, Ni Y, Wang Z, Tu W, Ni L, Zhuge F, Zheng A, Hu L, Zhao Y, Zheng L, et al. Spermidine improves gut barrier integrity and gut microbiota function in diet-induced obese mice. Gut Microbes. 2020;12:1–19. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1832857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lin MY, de Zoete MR, van Putten JP, Strijbis K. Redirection of epithelial immune responses by short-chain fatty acids through inhibition of histone deacetylases. Front Immunol. 2015;6:554. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Schulthess J, Pandey S, Capitani M, Rue-Albrecht KC, Arnold I, Franchini F, Chomka A, Ilott NE, Johnston DG, Pires E, et al. The short chain fatty acid butyrate imprints an antimicrobial program in macrophages. Immunity. 2019;50:432–445.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.12.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Smith PM, Howitt MR, Panikov N, Michaud M, Gallini CA, Bohlooly-Y M, Glickman JN, Garrett WS. The microbial metabolites, short-chain fatty acids, regulate colonic Treg cell homeostasis. Science. 2013;341:569–573. doi: 10.1126/science.1241165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Furusawa Y, Obata Y, Fukuda S, Endo TA, Nakato G, Takahashi D, Nakanishi Y, Uetake C, Kato K, Kato T, et al. Commensal microbe-derived butyrate induces the differentiation of colonic regulatory T cells. Nature. 2013;504:446–450. doi: 10.1038/nature12721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Arpaia N, Campbell C, Fan X, Dikiy S, van der Veeken J, deRoos P, Liu H, Cross JR, Pfeffer K, Coffer PJ, et al. Metabolites produced by commensal bacteria promote peripheral regulatory T-cell generation. Nature. 2013;504:451–455. doi: 10.1038/nature12726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Antunes KH, Fachi JL, de Paula R, da Silva EF, Pral LP, Dos Santos AA, Dias GB, Vargas JE, Puga R, Mayer FQ, et al. Microbiota-derived acetate protects against respiratory syncytial virus infection through a GPR43-type 1 interferon response. Nat Commun. 2019;10:3273. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11152-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Trompette A, Gollwitzer ES, Pattaroni C, Lopez-Mejia IC, Riva E, Pernot J, Ubags N, Fajas L, Nicod LP, Marsland BJ. Dietary fiber confers protection against flu by shaping Ly6c- patrolling monocyte hematopoiesis and CD8+ T cell metabolism. Immunity. 2018;48:992–1005.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.04.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Sencio V, Barthelemy A, Tavares LP, Machado MG, Soulard D, Cuinat C, Queiroz-Junior CM, Noordine ML, Salomé-Desnoulez S, Deryuter L, et al. Gut dysbiosis during influenza contributes to pulmonary pneumococcal superinfection through altered short-chain fatty acid production. Cell Reports. 2020;30:2934–2947.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Luu M, Riester Z, Baldrich A, Reichardt N, Yuille S, Busetti A, Klein M, Wempe A, Leister H, Raifer H, et al. Microbial short-chain fatty acids modulate CD8+ T cell responses and improve adoptive immunotherapy for cancer. Nat Commun. 2021;12:4077. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24331-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Yang W, Yu T, Huang X, Bilotta AJ, Xu L, Lu Y, Sun J, Pan F, Zhou J, Zhang W, et al. Intestinal microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids regulation of immune cell IL-22 production and gut immunity. Nat Commun. 2020;11:4457. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18262-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Sanchez HN, Moroney JB, Gan H, Shen T, Im JL, Li T, Taylor JR, Zan H, Casali P. B cell-intrinsic epigenetic modulation of antibody responses by dietary fiber-derived short-chain fatty acids. Nat Commun. 2020;11:60. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13603-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Jansen PL, Ghallab A, Vartak N, Reif R, Schaap FG, Hampe J, Hengstler JG. The ascending pathophysiology of cholestatic liver disease. Hepatology. 2017;65:722–738. doi: 10.1002/hep.28965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Song P, Zhang Y, Klaassen CD. Dose-response of five bile acids on serum and liver bile acid concentrations and hepatotoxicty in mice. Toxicol Sci. 2011;123:359–367. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfr177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Galle PR, Theilmann L, Raedsch R, Otto G, Stiehl A. Ursodeoxycholate reduces hepatotoxicity of bile salts in primary human hepatocytes. Hepatology. 1990;12:486–491. doi: 10.1002/hep.1840120307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Hofmann AF, Roda A. Physicochemical properties of bile acids and their relationship to biological properties: an overview of the problem. J Lipid Res. 1984;25:1477–1489. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Fiorucci S, Zampella A, Ricci P, Distrutti E, Biagioli M. Immunomodulatory functions of FXR. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2022;551:111650. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2022.111650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Zhou J, Cui S, He Q, Guo Y, Pan X, Zhang P, Huang N, Ge C, Wang G, Gonzalez FJ, et al. SUMOylation inhibitors synergize with FXR agonists in combating liver fibrosis. Nat Commun. 2020;11:240. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14138-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Zhang MY, Luo M, Wang JP. FXR expression in rats of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Sci Rep. 2022;12:8741. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12850-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Miyazaki T, Shirakami Y, Mizutani T, Maruta A, Ideta T, Kubota M, Sakai H, Ibuka T, Genovese S, Fiorito S, et al. Novel FXR agonist nelumal A suppresses colitis and inflammation-related colorectal carcinogenesis. Sci Rep. 2021;11:492. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79916-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Vavassori P, Mencarelli A, Renga B, Distrutti E, Fiorucci S. The bile acid receptor FXR is a modulator of intestinal innate immunity. J Immunol. 2009;183:6251–6261. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Kliewer SA, Moore JT, Wade L, Staudinger JL, Watson MA, Jones SA, McKee DD, Oliver BB, Willson TM, Zetterström RH, et al. An orphan nuclear receptor activated by pregnanes defines a novel steroid signaling pathway. Cell. 1998;92:73–82. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80900-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Staudinger JL, Goodwin B, Jones SA, Hawkins-Brown D, MacKenzie KI, LaTour A, Liu Y, Klaassen CD, Brown KK, Reinhard J, et al. The nuclear receptor PXR is a lithocholic acid sensor that protects against liver toxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:3369–3374. doi: 10.1073/pnas.051551698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Maruyama T, Miyamoto Y, Nakamura T, Tamai Y, Okada H, Sugiyama E, Nakamura T, Itadani H, Tanaka K. Identification of membrane-type receptor for bile acids (M-BAR) Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;298:714–719. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(02)02550-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Shi Y, Su W, Zhang L, Shi C, Zhou J, Wang P, Wang H, Shi X, Wei S, Wang Q, et al. TGR5 regulates macrophage inflammation in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis by modulating NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Front Immunol. 2021;11:609060. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.609060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Pols TW, Noriega LG, Nomura M, Auwerx J, Schoonjans K. The bile acid membrane receptor TGR5 as an emerging target in metabolism and inflammation. J Hepatol. 2011;54:1263–1272. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Portincasa P, Di Ciaula A, Garruti G, Vacca M, De Angelis M, Wang DQ. Bile acids and gpbar-1: dynamic interaction involving genes, environment and gut microbiome. Nutrients. 2020;12:3790. doi: 10.3390/nu12123709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Nagahashi M, Yuza K, Hirose Y, Nakajima M, Ramanathan R, Hait NC, Hylemon PB, Zhou H, Takabe K, Wakai T. The roles of bile acids and sphingosine-1-phosphate signaling in the hepatobiliary diseases. J Lipid Res. 2016;57:1636–1643. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R069286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Campbell C, Marchildon F, Michaels AJ, Takemoto N, van der Veeken J, Schizas M, Pritykin Y, Leslie CS, Intlekofer AM, Cohen P, et al. FXR mediates T cell-intrinsic responses to reduced feeding during infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117:33446–33454. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2020619117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Wilson A, Almousa A, Teft WA, Kim RB. Attenuation of bile acid-mediated FXR and PXR activation in patients with Crohn’s disease. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1866. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58644-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Gadaleta RM, van Erpecum KJ, Oldenburg B, Willemsen EC, Renooij W, Murzilli S, Klomp LW, Siersema PD, Schipper ME, Danese S, et al. Farnesoid X receptor activation inhibits inflammation and preserves the intestinal barrier in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 2011;60:463–472. doi: 10.1136/gut.2010.212159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Mencarelli A, Renga B, Migliorati M, Cipriani S, Distrutti E, Santucci L, Fiorucci S. The bile acid sensor farnesoid X receptor is a modulator of liver immunity in a rodent model of acute hepatitis. J Immunol. 2009;183:6657–6666. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Guillot A, Guerri L, Feng D, Kim SJ, Ahmed YA, Paloczi J, He Y, Schuebel K, Dai S, Liu F, et al. Bile acid-activated macrophages promote biliary epithelial cell proliferation through integrin αvβ6 upregulation following liver injury. J Clin Invest. 2021;131:e132305. doi: 10.1172/JCI132305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Wammers M, Schupp AK, Bode JG, Ehlting C, Wolf S, Deenen R, Köhrer K, Häussinger D, Graf D. Reprogramming of pro-inflammatory human macrophages to an anti-inflammatory phenotype by bile acids. Sci Rep. 2018;8:255. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18305-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Biagioli M, Carino A, Fiorucci C, Marchianò S, Di Giorgio C, Roselli R, Magro M, Distrutti E, Bereshchenko O, Scarpelli P, et al. Gpbar1 functions as gatekeeper for liver NKT cells and provides counterregulatory signals in mouse models of immune-mediated hepatitis. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;8:447–473. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2019.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Cipriani S, Mencarelli A, Chini MG, Distrutti E, Renga B, Bifulco G, Baldelli F, Donini A, Fiorucci S. The bile acid receptor GPBAR-1 (TGR5) modulates integrity of intestinal barrier and immune response to experimental colitis. PLoS One. 2011;6:e25637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Biagioli M, Carino A, Cipriani S, Francisci D, Marchianò S, Scarpelli P, Sorcini D, Zampella A, Fiorucci S. The bile acid receptor gpbar1 regulates the M1/M2 phenotype of intestinal macrophages and activation of GPBAR1 rescues mice from murine colitis. J Immunol. 2017;199:718–733. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1700183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Hu J, Wang C, Huang X, Yi S, Pan S, Zhang Y, Yuan G, Cao Q, Ye X, Li H. Gut microbiota-mediated secondary bile acids regulate dendritic cells to attenuate autoimmune uveitis through TGR5 signaling. Cell Reports. 2021;36:109726. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Keitel V, Donner M, Winandy S, Kubitz R, Häussinger D. Expression and function of the bile acid receptor TGR5 in Kupffer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;372:78–84. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.04.171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Ding C, Hong Y, Che Y, He T, Wang Y, Zhang S, Wu J, Xu W, Hou J, Hao H, et al. Bile acid restrained T cell activation explains cholestasis aggravated hepatitis B virus infection. FASEB J. 2022;36:e22468. doi: 10.1096/fj.202200332R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Pols TW, Puchner T, Korkmaz HI, Vos M, Soeters MR, de Vries CJ. Lithocholic acid controls adaptive immune responses by inhibition of Th1 activation through the Vitamin D receptor. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0176715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Shi Z, Wu X, Wu CY, Singh SP, Law T, Yamada D, Huynh M, Liakos W, Yang G, Farber JM, et al. Bile acids improve psoriasiform dermatitis through inhibition of IL-17A expression and CCL20-CCR6-mediated trafficking of T cells. J Invest Dermatol. 2022;142:1381–1390.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2021.10.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Song X, Sun X, Oh SF, Wu M, Zhang Y, Zheng W, Geva-Zatorsky N, Jupp R, Mathis D, Benoist C, et al. Microbial bile acid metabolites modulate gut RORγ+ regulatory T cell homeostasis. Nature. 2020;577:410–415. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1865-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Hang S, Paik D, Yao L, Kim E, Trinath J, Lu J, Ha S, Nelson BN, Kelly SP, Wu L, et al. Bile acid metabolites control TH17 and Treg cell differentiation. Nature. 2019;576:143–148. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1785-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Campbell C, McKenney PT, Konstantinovsky D, Isaeva OI, Schizas M, Verter J, Mai C, Jin WB, Guo CJ, Violante S, et al. Bacterial metabolism of bile acids promotes generation of peripheral regulatory T cells. Nature. 2020;581:475–479. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2193-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Banerji R, Kanojiya P, Patil A, Saroj SD. Polyamines in the virulence of bacterial pathogens of respiratory tract. Mol Oral Microbiol. 2021;36:1–11. doi: 10.1111/omi.12315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Rollins-Smith LA, Ruzzini AC, Fites JS, Reinert LK, Hall EM, Joosse BA, Ravikumar VI, Huebner MI, Aka A, Kehs MH, et al. Metabolites involved in immune evasion by Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis include the polyamine spermidine. Infect Immun. 2019;87:e00035-19. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00035-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Firpo MR, Mastrodomenico V, Hawkins GM, Prot M, Levillayer L, Gallagher T, Simon-Loriere E, Mounce BC. Targeting polyamines inhibits coronavirus infection by reducing cellular attachment and entry. ACS Infect Dis. 2021;7:1423–1432. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Hardbower DM, Asim M, Luis PB, Singh K, Barry DP, Yang C, Steeves MA, Cleveland JL, Schneider C, Piazuelo MB, et al. Ornithine decarboxylase regulates M1 macrophage activation and mucosal inflammation via histone modifications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114:E751–E760. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1614958114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Puleston DJ, Simon AK. New roles for autophagy and spermidine in T cells. Microb Cell. 2015;2:91–93. doi: 10.15698/mic2015.03.195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Rossi G, Cerquetella M, Scarpona S, Pengo G, Fettucciari K, Bassotti G, Jergens AE, Suchodolski JS. Effects of probiotic bacteria on mucosal polyamines levels in dogs with IBD and colonic polyps: a preliminary study. Benef Microbes. 2018;9:247–255. doi: 10.3920/BM2017.0024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Puntambekar SS, Davis DS, Hawel L, 3rd, Crane J, Byus CV, Carson MJ. LPS-induced CCL2 expression and macrophage influx into the murine central nervous system is polyamine-dependent. Brain Behav Immun. 2011;25:629–639. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2010.12.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Zhang M, Caragine T, Wang H, Cohen PS, Botchkina G, Soda K, Bianchi M, Ulrich P, Cerami A, Sherry B, et al. Spermine inhibits proinflammatory cytokine synthesis in human mononuclear cells: a counterregulatory mechanism that restrains the immune response. J Exp Med. 1997;185:1759–1768. doi: 10.1084/jem.185.10.1759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Cao W, Wu X, Jia G, Zhao H, Chen X, Wu C, Tang J, Wang J, Cai J, Liu G. New insights into the role of dietary spermine on inflammation, immune function and related-signalling molecules in the thymus and spleen of piglets. Arch Anim Nutr. 2017;71:175–191. doi: 10.1080/1745039X.2017.1314610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Zhu S, Ashok M, Li J, Li W, Yang H, Wang P, Tracey KJ, Sama AE, Wang H. Spermine protects mice against lethal sepsis partly by attenuating surrogate inflammatory markers. Mol Med. 2009;15:275–282. doi: 10.2119/molmed.2009.00062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Li G, Ding H, Yu X, Meng Y, Li J, Guo Q, Zhou H, Shen N. Spermidine suppresses inflammatory DC function by activating the FOXO3 pathway and counteracts autoimmunity. iScience. 2020;23:100807. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2019.100807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Puleston DJ, Buck MD, Klein Geltink RI, Kyle RL, Caputa G, O’Sullivan D, Cameron AM, Castoldi A, Musa Y, Kabat AM, et al. Polyamines and eIF5A hypusination modulate mitochondrial respiration and macrophage activation. Cell Metab. 2019;30:352–363.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Jeong JW, Cha HJ, Han MH, Hwang SJ, Lee DS, Yoo JS, Choi IW, Kim S, Kim HS, Kim GY, et al. Spermidine protects against oxidative stress in inflammation models using macrophages and zebrafish. Biomol Ther (Seoul) 2018;26:146–156. doi: 10.4062/biomolther.2016.272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Zhang H, Alsaleh G, Feltham J, Sun Y, Napolitano G, Riffelmacher T, Charles P, Frau L, Hublitz P, Yu Z, et al. Polyamines control eIF5A hypusination, TFEB translation, and autophagy to reverse B cell senescence. Mol Cell. 2019;76:110–125.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Pandiyan P, Bhaskaran N, Zou M, Schneider E, Jayaraman S, Huehn J. Microbiome dependent regulation of Tregs and Th17 cells in mucosa. Front Immunol. 2019;10:426. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Li H, Myeroff L, Smiraglia D, Romero MF, Pretlow TP, Kasturi L, Lutterbaugh J, Rerko RM, Casey G, Issa JP, et al. SLC5A8, a sodium transporter, is a tumor suppressor gene silenced by methylation in human colon aberrant crypt foci and cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:8412–8417. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1430846100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Suzuki T, Yoshida S, Hara H. Physiological concentrations of short-chain fatty acids immediately suppress colonic epithelial permeability. Br J Nutr. 2008;100:297–305. doi: 10.1017/S0007114508888733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Singh N, Gurav A, Sivaprakasam S, Brady E, Padia R, Shi H, Thangaraju M, Prasad PD, Manicassamy S, Munn DH, et al. Activation of Gpr109a, receptor for niacin and the commensal metabolite butyrate, suppresses colonic inflammation and carcinogenesis. Immunity. 2014;40:128–139. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Brown AJ, Goldsworthy SM, Barnes AA, Eilert MM, Tcheang L, Daniels D, Muir AI, Wigglesworth MJ, Kinghorn I, Fraser NJ, et al. The orphan G protein-coupled receptors GPR41 and GPR43 are activated by propionate and other short chain carboxylic acids. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:11312–11319. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M211609200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Maslowski KM, Vieira AT, Ng A, Kranich J, Sierro F, Yu D, Schilter HC, Rolph MS, Mackay F, Artis D, et al. Regulation of inflammatory responses by gut microbiota and chemoattractant receptor GPR43. Nature. 2009;461:1282–1286. doi: 10.1038/nature08530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Kang HJ, Kim GC, Lee CG, Park S, Sharma G, Verma R, Im SH, Kwon HK. Probiotics-derived metabolite ameliorates skin allergy by promoting differentiation of FOXP3+ regulatory T cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;147:1517–1521. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.11.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Krautkramer KA, Kreznar JH, Romano KA, Vivas EI, Barrett-Wilt GA, Rabaglia ME, Keller MP, Attie AD, Rey FE, Denu JM. Diet-microbiota interactions mediate global epigenetic programming in multiple host tissues. Mol Cell. 2016;64:982–992. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.10.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Candido EP, Reeves R, Davie JR. Sodium butyrate inhibits histone deacetylation in cultured cells. Cell. 1978;14:105–113. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90305-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Park J, Kim M, Kang SG, Jannasch AH, Cooper B, Patterson J, Kim CH. Short-chain fatty acids induce both effector and regulatory T cells by suppression of histone deacetylases and regulation of the mTOR-S6K pathway. Mucosal Immunol. 2015;8:80–93. doi: 10.1038/mi.2014.44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Coutzac C, Jouniaux JM, Paci A, Schmidt J, Mallardo D, Seck A, Asvatourian V, Cassard L, Saulnier P, Lacroix L, et al. Systemic short chain fatty acids limit antitumor effect of CTLA-4 blockade in hosts with cancer. Nat Commun. 2020;11:2168. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16079-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Puleston DJ, Baixauli F, Sanin DE, Edwards-Hicks J, Villa M, Kabat AM, Kamiński MM, Stanckzak M, Weiss HJ, Grzes KM, et al. Polyamine metabolism is a central determinant of helper T cell lineage fidelity. Cell. 2021;184:4186–4202.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Wagner A, Wang C, Fessler J, DeTomaso D, Avila-Pacheco J, Kaminski J, Zaghouani S, Christian E, Thakore P, Schellhaass B, et al. Metabolic modeling of single Th17 cells reveals regulators of autoimmunity. Cell. 2021;184:4168–4185.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.05.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Mondanelli G, Bianchi R, Pallotta MT, Orabona C, Albini E, Iacono A, Belladonna ML, Vacca C, Fallarino F, Macchiarulo A, et al. A relay pathway between arginine and tryptophan metabolism confers immunosuppressive properties on dendritic cells. Immunity. 2017;46:233–244. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Carriche GM, Almeida L, Stüve P, Velasquez L, Dhillon-LaBrooy A, Roy U, Lindenberg M, Strowig T, Plaza-Sirvent C, Schmitz I, et al. Regulating T-cell differentiation through the polyamine spermidine. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;147:335–348.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.04.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Trapecar M, Communal C, Velazquez J, Maass CA, Huang YJ, Schneider K, Wright CW, Butty V, Eng G, Yilmaz O, et al. Gut-liver physiomimetics reveal paradoxical modulation of IBD-related inflammation by short-chain fatty acids. Cell Syst. 2020;10:223–239.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2020.02.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Behary J, Amorim N, Jiang XT, Raposo A, Gong L, McGovern E, Ibrahim R, Chu F, Stephens C, Jebeili H, et al. Gut microbiota impact on the peripheral immune response in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease related hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Commun. 2021;12:187. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20422-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Du HX, Yue SY, Niu D, Liu C, Zhang LG, Chen J, Chen Y, Guan Y, Hua XL, Li C, et al. Gut microflora modulates Th17/Treg cell differentiation in experimental autoimmune prostatitis via the short-chain fatty acid propionate. Front Immunol. 2022;13:915218. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.915218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Scheppach W, Sommer H, Kirchner T, Paganelli GM, Bartram P, Christl S, Richter F, Dusel G, Kasper H. Effect of butyrate enemas on the colonic mucosa in distal ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 1992;103:51–56. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(92)91094-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Harig JM, Soergel KH, Komorowski RA, Wood CM. Treatment of diversion colitis with short-chain-fatty acid irrigation. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:23–28. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198901053200105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Segain JP, Raingeard de la Blétière D, Bourreille A, Leray V, Gervois N, Rosales C, Ferrier L, Bonnet C, Blottière HM, Galmiche JP. Butyrate inhibits inflammatory responses through NFκB inhibition: implications for Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2000;47:397–403. doi: 10.1136/gut.47.3.397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Bäckhed F, Manchester JK, Semenkovich CF, Gordon JI. Mechanisms underlying the resistance to diet-induced obesity in germ-free mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:979–984. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605374104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Wang Z, Klipfell E, Bennett BJ, Koeth R, Levison BS, Dugar B, Feldstein AE, Britt EB, Fu X, Chung YM, et al. Gut flora metabolism of phosphatidylcholine promotes cardiovascular disease. Nature. 2011;472:57–63. doi: 10.1038/nature09922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Zhu W, Gregory JC, Org E, Buffa JA, Gupta N, Wang Z, Li L, Fu X, Wu Y, Mehrabian M, et al. Gut microbial metabolite TMAO enhances platelet hyperreactivity and thrombosis risk. Cell. 2016;165:111–124. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.De Vadder F, Kovatcheva-Datchary P, Goncalves D, Vinera J, Zitoun C, Duchampt A, Bäckhed F, Mithieux G. Microbiota-generated metabolites promote metabolic benefits via gut-brain neural circuits. Cell. 2014;156:84–96. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Buffington SA, Di Prisco GV, Auchtung TA, Ajami NJ, Petrosino JF, Costa-Mattioli M. Microbial reconstitution reverses maternal diet-induced social and synaptic deficits in offspring. Cell. 2016;165:1762–1775. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Trompette A, Gollwitzer ES, Yadava K, Sichelstiel AK, Sprenger N, Ngom-Bru C, Blanchard C, Junt T, Nicod LP, Harris NL, et al. Gut microbiota metabolism of dietary fiber influences allergic airway disease and hematopoiesis. Nat Med. 2014;20:159–166. doi: 10.1038/nm.3444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Ye Z, Zhang N, Wu C, Zhang X, Wang Q, Huang X, Du L, Cao Q, Tang J, Zhou C, et al. A metagenomic study of the gut microbiome in Behcet’s disease. Microbiome. 2018;6:135. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0520-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Ma C, Han M, Heinrich B, Fu Q, Zhang Q, Sandhu M, Agdashian D, Terabe M, Berzofsky JA, Fako V, et al. Gut microbiome-mediated bile acid metabolism regulates liver cancer via NKT cells. Science. 2018;360:eaan5931. doi: 10.1126/science.aan5931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Lee CK, Jeong SH, Jang C, Bae H, Kim YH, Park I, Kim SK, Koh GY. Tumor metastasis to lymph nodes requires YAP-dependent metabolic adaptation. Science. 2019;363:644–649. doi: 10.1126/science.aav0173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Fu T, Coulter S, Yoshihara E, Oh TG, Fang S, Cayabyab F, Zhu Q, Zhang T, Leblanc M, Liu S, et al. FXR regulates intestinal cancer stem cell proliferation. Cell. 2019;176:1098–1112.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Fiorucci S, Di Giorgio C, Distrutti E. Obeticholic acid: an update of its pharmacological activities in liver disorders. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2019;256:283–295. doi: 10.1007/164_2019_227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Vang S, Longley K, Steer CJ, Low WC. The unexpected uses of urso- and tauroursodeoxycholic acid in the treatment of non-liver diseases. Glob Adv Health Med. 2014;3:58–69. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2014.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Daruich A, Jaworski T, Henry H, Zola M, Youale J, Parenti L, Naud MC, Delaunay K, Bertrand M, Berdugo M, et al. Oral ursodeoxycholic acid crosses the blood retinal barrier in patients with retinal detachment and protects against retinal degeneration in an ex vivo model. Neurotherapeutics. 2021;18:1325–1338. doi: 10.1007/s13311-021-01009-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Loomba R, Sanyal AJ, Lavine JE, Van Natta ML, Abdelmalek MF, Chalasani N, Dasarathy S, Diehl AM, Hameed B, et al. Farnesoid X nuclear receptor ligand obeticholic acid for non-cirrhotic, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (FLINT): a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385:956–965. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61933-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Weingarden AR, Chen C, Zhang N, Graiziger CT, Dosa PI, Steer CJ, Shaughnessy MK, Johnson JR, Sadowsky MJ, Khoruts A. Ursodeoxycholic acid inhibits clostridium difficile spore germination and vegetative growth, and prevents recurrence of ileal pouchitis associated with the infection. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016;50:624–630. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Lindor KD, Kowdley KV, Luketic VA, Harrison ME, McCashland T, Befeler AS, Harnois D, Jorgensen R, Petz J, Keach J, et al. High-dose ursodeoxycholic acid for the treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology. 2009;50:808–814. doi: 10.1002/hep.23082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Mousa OY, Juran BD, McCauley BM, Vesterhus MN, Folseraas T, Turgeon CT, Ali AH, Schlicht EM, Atkinson EJ, Hu C, et al. Bile acid profiles in primary sclerosing cholangitis and their ability to predict hepatic decompensation. Hepatology. 2021;74:281–295. doi: 10.1002/hep.31652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Kowdley KV, Luketic V, Chapman R, Hirschfield GM, Poupon R, Schramm C, Vincent C, Rust C, Parés A, Mason A, et al. A randomized trial of obeticholic acid monotherapy in patients with primary biliary cholangitis. Hepatology. 2018;67:1890–1902. doi: 10.1002/hep.29569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Liu R, Li X, Ma H, Yang Q, Shang Q, Song L, Zheng Z, Zhang S, Pan Y, Huang P, et al. Spermidine endows macrophages anti-inflammatory properties by inducing mitochondrial superoxide-dependent AMPK activation, Hif-1α upregulation and autophagy. Free Radic Biol Med. 2020;161:339–350. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.10.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Baier J, Gänsbauer M, Giessler C, Arnold H, Muske M, Schleicher U, Lukassen S, Ekici A, Rauh M, Daniel C, et al. Arginase impedes the resolution of colitis by altering the microbiome and metabolome. J Clin Invest. 2020;130:5703–5720. doi: 10.1172/JCI126923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Guo X, Harada C, Namekata K, Kimura A, Mitamura Y, Yoshida H, Matsumoto Y, Harada T. Spermidine alleviates severity of murine experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:2696–2703. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Yang Q, Zheng C, Cao J, Cao G, Shou P, Lin L, Velletri T, Jiang M, Chen Q, Han Y, et al. Spermidine alleviates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis through inducing inhibitory macrophages. Cell Death Differ. 2016;23:1850–1861. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2016.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Kim HA, Lee HS, Shin TH, Jung JY, Baek WY, Park HJ, Lee G, Paik MJ, Suh CH. Polyamine patterns in plasma of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and fever. Lupus. 2018;27:930–938. doi: 10.1177/0961203317751860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Wang X, Stearns NA, Li X, Pisetsky DS. The effect of polyamines on the binding of anti-DNA antibodies from patients with SLE and normal human subjects. Clin Immunol. 2014;153:94–103. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2014.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Furumitsu Y, Yukioka K, Kojima A, Yukioka M, Shichikawa K, Ochi T, Matsui-Yuasa I, Otani S, Nishizawa Y, Morii H. Levels of urinary polyamines in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1993;20:1661–1665. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Yukioka K, Wakitani S, Yukioka M, Furumitsu Y, Shichikawa K, Ochi T, Goto H, Matsui-Yuasa I, Otani S, Nishizawa Y, et al. Polyamine levels in synovial tissues and synovial fluids of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1992;19:689–692. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Iezaki T, Hinoi E, Yamamoto T, Ishiura R, Ogawa S, Yoneda Y. Amelioration by the natural polyamine spermine of cartilage and bone destruction in rats with collagen-induced arthritis. J Pharmacol Sci. 2012;119:107–111. doi: 10.1254/jphs.11241sc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Karouzakis E, Gay RE, Gay S, Neidhart M. Increased recycling of polyamines is associated with global DNA hypomethylation in rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:1809–1817. doi: 10.1002/art.34340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Klein K, Gay S. Epigenetics in rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2015;27:76–82. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Moreno B, Fernandez-Diez B, Di Penta A, Villoslada P. Preclinical studies of methylthioadenosine for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2010;16:1102–1108. doi: 10.1177/1352458510375968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Moreno B, Hevia H, Santamaria M, Sepulcre J, Muñoz J, García-Trevijano ER, Berasain C, Corrales FJ, Avila MA, Villoslada P. Methylthioadenosine reverses brain autoimmune disease. Ann Neurol. 2006;60:323–334. doi: 10.1002/ana.20895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Wu R, Chen X, Kang S, Wang T, Gnanaprakasam JR, Yao Y, Liu L, Fan G, Burns MR, Wang R. De novo synthesis and salvage pathway coordinately regulate polyamine homeostasis and determine T cell proliferation and function. Sci Adv. 2020;6:eabc4275. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abc4275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Brown CT, Davis-Richardson AG, Giongo A, Gano KA, Crabb DB, Mukherjee N, Casella G, Drew JC, Ilonen J, Knip M, et al. Gut microbiome metagenomics analysis suggests a functional model for the development of autoimmunity for type 1 diabetes. PLoS One. 2011;6:e25792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Böttcher MF, Nordin EK, Sandin A, Midtvedt T, Björkstén B. Microflora-associated characteristics in faeces from allergic and nonallergic infants. Clin Exp Allergy. 2000;30:1590–1596. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2000.00982.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Sinha SR, Haileselassie Y, Nguyen LP, Tropini C, Wang M, Becker LS, Sim D, Jarr K, Spear ET, Singh G, et al. Dysbiosis-induced secondary bile acid deficiency promotes intestinal inflammation. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;27:659–670.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.01.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Bazzari FH, Abdallah DM, El-Abhar HS. Chenodeoxycholic acid ameliorates alcl3-induced Alzheimer’s disease neurotoxicity and cognitive deterioration via enhanced insulin signaling in rats. Molecules. 2019;24:1992. doi: 10.3390/molecules24101992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Hu J, Wang C, Huang X, Yi S, Pan S, Zhang Y, Yuan G, Cao Q, Ye X, Li H. Gut microbiota-mediated secondary bile acids regulate dendritic cells to attenuate autoimmune uveitis through TGR5 signaling. Cell Reports. 2021;36:109726. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Liu H, Tian R, Wang H, Feng S, Li H, Xiao Y, Luan X, Zhang Z, Shi N, Niu H, et al. Gut microbiota from coronary artery disease patients contributes to vascular dysfunction in mice by regulating bile acid metabolism and immune activation. J Transl Med. 2020;18:382. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02539-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Mikó E, Vida A, Kovács T, Ujlaki G, Trencsényi G, Márton J, Sári Z, Kovács P, Boratkó A, Hujber Z, et al. Lithocholic acid, a bacterial metabolite reduces breast cancer cell proliferation and aggressiveness. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg. 2018;1859:958–974. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2018.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Lepercq P, Gérard P, Béguet F, Raibaud P, Grill JP, Relano P, Cayuela C, Juste C. Epimerization of chenodeoxycholic acid to ursodeoxycholic acid by Clostridium baratii isolated from human feces. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2004;235:65–72. doi: 10.1016/j.femsle.2004.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Ridlon JM, Harris SC, Bhowmik S, Kang DJ, Hylemon PB. Consequences of bile salt biotransformations by intestinal bacteria. Gut Microbes. 2016;7:22–39. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2015.1127483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Zhang H, Xu H, Zhang C, Tang Q, Bi F. Ursodeoxycholic acid suppresses the malignant progression of colorectal cancer through TGR5-YAP axis. Cell Death Dis. 2021;7:207. doi: 10.1038/s41420-021-00589-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Mueller M, Thorell A, Claudel T, Jha P, Koefeler H, Lackner C, Hoesel B, Fauler G, Stojakovic T, Einarsson C, et al. Ursodeoxycholic acid exerts farnesoid X receptor-antagonistic effects on bile acid and lipid metabolism in morbid obesity. J Hepatol. 2015;62:1398–1404. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.12.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Immune Network are provided here courtesy of The Korean Association of Immunologists

RESOURCES