Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 7;11(3):23259671231154540. doi: 10.1177/23259671231154540

Appendix Table A1.

Characteristics of the Included Studies a

Lead Author (Year) Sample Size, n Age at Surgery, y RTA Criteria Follow-up, y No. (%) of ACL Graft Failures No. (%) of Contralateral ACL Injuries
Anderson (2003) 3 12 13.3 ± 1.4 Time (∼6.5 mo) 4.1 ± 1.9 0 (0) 0 (0)
Aronowitz (2000) 6 19 13.3 ± 1 Quad strength (LSI >90%) 2.1 ± 1.1 0 (0) 0 (0)
Calvo (2015) 14 27 13 ± 1 Isokinetic strength (LSI >90%) 10.6 ± 0.8 4 (15) NR
Fourman (2021) 23 43 11.4 ± 1.8 6 mo noncontact sports; 9 mo contact sports 5.5 ± 2.4 4 (11) NR
Gagliardi (2020) 24 81 15.9 ± 1.7 Endurance, jumping, strength and agility single-leg tests (LSI >90%) 3.1 ± 0.2 1 (1) 8 (10)
Goddard (2013) 25 32 12.4 ± 2.5 Time (12 mo) 2 ± 0 0 (0) NR
Graziano (2017) 29 42 12 ± 1.3 KT-1000 arthrometry (LSI), isokinetic leg strength (LSI), single-leg hop (LSI), sport-specific movements (control and quality) NR 3 (7) 2 (5)
Johnson (2020) 41 26 NR Quadriceps index >90%, single-leg hop test >90%, KOS-ADLS >90%, single-item GRS >90%, surgeon approval 2 ± 0 3 (12) 5 (19)
Kocher (2018) 44 237 11.2 ± 1.7 Patient tolerance 6.2 ± 5.7 9 (7) NR
Lanzetti (2020) 45 42 12.5 ± 0.8 Muscular tropism judged by surgeon 8 ± 12.5 2 (5) 1 (2)
Larson (2016) 46 29 13.9 ± 1.6 Anterior and triple hop (LSI >90%, landing and pivoting mechanics) 4 ± 1.3 5 (17) 5 (17)
Luo (2015) 53 124 16.1 ± 1.4 Satisfactory score on 6 of the 7 isokinetic knee extension and flexion strength (LSI >85%), vertical jump, single- and triple-hop tests (LSI >90%) 0.5 ± 0 NR NR
Nikolaou (2011) 60 8 13.7 ± 1.1 6 mo NR 4 (4) NR
Pennock (2018) 67 30 11.8 ± 1.6 ROM (LSI 100%), girth (0-1 cm), isokinetic leg strength (LSI), single-leg heel raise (LSI >90%), single-leg dip angle (LSI 100%), single-leg dip endurance (LSI >88%), single-leg anterior, cross, and triple hop (LSI >90%), tuck jump (no deviations), t test shuffle and sprint (no hesitation or valgus) 3.2 ± 0.8 4 (15) 3 (12)
Pennock (2019) 68 90 14.8 ± 1.4 Same as for Pennock (2018) 2.7 ± 0.9 13 (16) 10 (12)
Salmon (2018) 70 39 16 ± 1 Time (6 mo), ligamentous stability judged by surgeon NR 15 (39) 5 (13)
Sankar (2006) 72 12 15.6 ± 1.1 Isokinetic quadriceps strength (LSI >85%) 5.3 ± 1.4 0 (0) 0 (0)
Sankar (2008) 71 247 15.4 ± 1.3 Quadriceps strength (LSI >85%) 6.3 ± 2 17 (7) NR
Severyns (2016) 73 11 13.5 ± 1.2 Time (6 mo) 2.08 ± 1.3 NR NR
Shelbourne (2004) 75 16 14.8 ± 0.7 ROM (LSI 100%), patient confidence, isokinetic quadriceps strength (LSI >90%) 3.4 ± 1.1 1 (6) 2 (13)
Shelbourne (2009) 74 528 NR ROM (LSI 100%), isokinetic quadriceps strength (LSI >85%) >5 46 (9) 46 (9)
Shelbourne (2009) 76 402 15.6 ± 1 Patients felt comfortable 9.8 ± 5.2 43 (11) 63 (16)
Streich (2010) 80 16 11 ± 0.8 Time (12 mo) 5.8 ± 0.9 0 (0) NR
Sugimoto (2020) 81 105 13.4 ± 1.4 Isometric leg strength (LSI >90%); anterior, cross, triple, and timed hop tests (LSI >90%); Y-balance test (LSI >90%) 0.5-0.75 NR NR
Wall (2017) 82 27 11.4 ± 1.9 Leg strength, hop, agility (LSI >85%) 3.6 ± 1.4 4 (15) 2 (7)
Willimon (2015) 84 21 11.8 ± 1 Anterior, cross, triple, and timed hops (LSI) 3 ± 1.5 2 (10) NR
Willson (2018) 85 23 13 ± 1.4 Time (6 mo), no pain or swelling; ROM (LSI 100%), Pedi-IKDC and ACL-RSI score, isometric and isokinetic leg strength (LSI >90%), hopping tests (distance and form) 1.8 ± 1 0 (0) 3 (13)

a Data are reported as n (%) or mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated. ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; ACL-RSI, Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Return to Sport after Injury scale; GRS, Global Rating Scale of perceived knee function; KOS-ADLS, Knee Outcome Survey–Activities of Daily Living Scale; LSI, limb symmetry index; NR, not reported; Pedi-IKDC, Pediatric International Knee Documentation Committee questionnaire; ROM, range of motion; RTA, return to activity.