Table 2.

Performances in visual exploration (search time, in s) and reading (words per minute, wpm) at baseline and after treatment, number of sessions, and improvement per session. n: number of subjects. Numbers indicate means (standard errors in brackets), and mean percentages (standard errors in brackets).

Baseline	Sessions	Improvement	Improvement/session
Exploration
> 50 s (n = 18)	14.0 (3.5)	23.8 (9.7) [39.6% (11.2)]	1.8 (0.8) [3.0% (1.4)]
50–40 s (n = 17)	12.3 (3.3)	19.5 (4.7) [43.6% (8.6)]	1.6 (0.4) [3.7% (1.0)]
39–33 s (n = 17)	12.8 (2.6)	13.9 (3.3) [38.6% (9.0)]	1.1 (0.3) [3.1% (0.9)]
32–29 s (n = 20)	10.6 (3.2)	11.3 (3.0) [36.9% (9.6)]	1.1 (0.4) [3.7% (1.2)]
28–25 s (n = 13)	08.8 (2.4)	08.5 (3.1) [31.7% (11.5)]	1.0 (0.4) [3.7% (1.4)]
24–19 s (n = 12)	08.3 (2.0)	08.4 (2.0) [38.0% (6.9)]	1.1 (0.4) [4.6% (1.6)]
Reading
34–60 wpm (n = 18)	12.8 (3.2)	30.2 (15.4) [63.3% (40.7)]	2.3 (0.9) [4.8% (2.1)]
61–80 wpm (n = 17)	13.7 (3.7)	34.4 (22.3) [48.4% (31.4)]	2.6 (1.7) [3.6% (2.3)]
81–99 wpm (n = 15)	14.1 (3.9)	44.6 (19.3) [50.7% (23.0)]	3.3 (1.7) [3.7% (1.9)]
100–120 wpm (n = 18)	11.2 (3.5)	35.0 (13.4) [32.3% (12.7)]	3.5 (2.2) [3.1% (2.2)]
121–145 wpm (n = 15)	09.2 (2.2)	23.7 (11.4) [17.7% (8.6)]	2.8 (1.4) [1.9% (0.7)]
146–170 wpm (n = 14)	08.4 (2.4)	19.6 (8.1) [13.4% (6.2)]	2.5 (1.3) [1.7% (0.8)]