Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 11;13(3):jkac321. doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkac321

Table 1.

A comparison among Han1, GRCh38, and the assemblies of previously released Chinese genomes.

Genome Ethnicity Contig N50 (Mb) Number of contigs Number of gaps Assembly size (Gb)
Han1a SH Chinese 148.02 25 0 3.10
HG00621 (hifiasm)b SH Chinese 95.77 182 157 3.11
T2T-CHM13v2.0c Northern European 150.62 25 0 3.12
HJ-H1d NH Chinese 28.15 1,330 427 3.07
HJ-H2d NH Chinese 25.90 896 390 2.91
NH1d NH Chinese 3.60 11,019 8,484 2.89
HX1d SH Chinese 8.33 5,843 4,025 2.93
YH2.0e SH Chinese 0.02 361,157 235,514 2.91
TJ1.p0f Tujia 13.67 1,430 907 2.87
TJ1.p1f Tujia 13.70 1,426 873 2.87
ZF1g Tibetan 23.62 1,384 1360 2.85
GRCh38.p14h Mixed 57.88 994 804 3.10

Assembly sizes include estimated gaps.

aStatistics based on chromosomes 1–22, X, Y and mitochondrial DNA of Han1 (CHM13 reference-guided assembly).

bStatistics based on primary contigs of HG00621 hifiasm de novo assembly.

cStatistics calculated directly from the T2T-CHM13 assembly, v2.0.

dStatistics taken from Table 1 and results of Yang et al. (2022).

eStatistics calculated directly from the YH2.0 assembly, downloaded from NCBI at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assembly/GCA˙000004845.2/.

fStatistics taken from Table 1 and Supplementary Table S2 of Lou et al. (2022).

gStatistics calculated directly from the ZF1 assembly, downloaded from the ZF1 Genome Sequence Archive page at https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/bioproject/browse/PRJCA000936.

hStatistics calculated directly from the GRCh38 assembly, downloaded from NCBI at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assembly/GCF˙000001405.26/. Statistics calculated using the primary assembly only, excluding alternative scaffolds. Scaffolds were split into contigs at position where the number of Ns was greater than 10.