Table 1.
Feedback of SNAPPS by postgraduate students
| Feedback Parameter | Faculty group (n=12) | Senior resident group (n=12) |
|---|---|---|
| Do you feel SNAPPS was an organized form of case discussion | 4.5 (4.5) | 4 (4,4.25) |
| The time allowed for preparation and sensitization sufficient | 4 (2.75,5) | 5 (4,5) |
| The duration provided for the encounter was adequate | 4.5 (3,5) | 4 (4,4.25) |
| Feedback given during the encounter would be useful in improving future clinical performance | 5 (4,5) | 5 (4,5) |
| The exercise was conducted in a non-threatening environment | 5 (4.75,5) | 5 (5,5) |
| Direct and detailed discussion induced anxiety while performing the activity | 3 (2,4) | 2 (2,3.25) |
| Did this technique change your attitude towards examining & managing a patient | 4 (3, 4.25) | 4 (3,4) |
| Did the technique help in solving your confusion & doubts regarding patient examination & management? | 4 (4,4.25) | 4 (4,5) |
| Does the level of assessor (seniority/experience) important for this exercise to be successful | 4 (4,5) | 4 (3.75, 5) |
| How satisfied are you with this method of teaching | 4 (3,5) | 4 (4, 4.25) |
Scores represented as median (IQR) five-point Likert scale where 1- strongly disagree and 5- strongly agree; P>0.05 for all comparisons