BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity around the world. According to the Global burden of disease study 2017 prevalence of CKD has increased 29·3% (95% UI 26·4 to 32·6) across the age since 1990. 35·8 million (95% UI 33·7 to 38·0) Disability Adjusted Life Years has been accounted for CKD in 2017 where the diabetic nephropathy accounting for almost a third of DALYs. Kidney disease has a major effect on global health both as a direct cause of global morbidity and mortality and as an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease. CKD is largely preventable and treatable provided detected in the early phase. As CKD progress asymptomatically without manifestation of clinical symptoms in certain cases up till 70% damage of the kidney. Thus, early detection by regular screening will be very effective to deterrent it to reach the projected the 5th most common cause of years of life lost globally by 2040. Urine albumin is a reliable and established non-invasive biomarker for the detection and monitoring of CKD. The reference standard for measuring albumin in urine is testing sample from 24 h urine collection however more convenient method used in routine practice involve urinary dipsticks or measurement of the albumin or total protein concentration in a spot urine sample. At the point of care dipsticks have been used for more than 50 years to measure renal albumin loss. These reagent strip devices primarily detect albumin by a colorimetric reaction with the dipstick-impregnated reagent based on the albumin concentration within the sample. Using dipsticks for detecting glomerular albuminuria has two major limitations. First most reagent strips are poor at detecting low grade but clinically relevant urinary albumin loss of 30—300 mg per day. Second tests are often falsely positive in situations of concentrated or highly alkaline urine after use of iodinated contrast agents or in case of gross hematuria. The alternative reliable and sensitive test is immunological method based that require centralized lab facility cold chain logistics and expensive. To address this issue, there has been considerable effort to develop compact and field-portable sensitive diagnostics tools that can measure < 300 mg/L albumin concentration in urine samples. In the high-risk CKD group like diabetes and hypertension patients frequent and routine monitoring through urine albumin testing is recommended. However, the inconvenience of testing at centralized laboratory or avoiding exposure or inaccessibility during situation like COIVD pandemic the self-monitoring device can be very helpful. This can improve the patient compliance significantly as has been evidenced with glucometer.
AIM OF THE STUDY: To establish a novel point of care and self-health monitoring urine albumin testing platform Proflo-U® comprising of a mini-analyzer fluorescence dye based micro-albumin test cartridge and an android app as an alternative to present method of lab-based micro-albumin analysis.
METHODS: 1. Testing process of albumin on Proflo-U® platform. 170 ul sample should be added to the Testing cartridge tube 1 and mixed properly. Empty tube 1 by pouring the solution into Testing cartridge tube 2. Wait for 2 minutes for the sample to filter down into the lower chamber filling up 80% of the chamber volume or > 11 mm height from the base. Switch on the mini-analyzer from the power button and connect with the android app through Bluetooth connection. Select the program for albumin reading on the app and press the button read to get the relative fluorescence unit or concentration in mg/L. The app averages all input data points to give the reliable readout in 25 seconds. 2. Determination of range of detection of Proflo-U® platform. Human Recombinant Serum Albumin (Himedia® Cat No. CF001-1G Lot No. 0000451232) stock of 10 mg/ml has been used to prepare the solution in 1X Phosphate Buffer Saline {137 mM NaCl (Sigma Aldrich Cat No. S7653-250G Lot No. SLBV9983), 10 mM KH2PO4 (Merck Emplura® Cat No. 1.93605.5021 Lot No. DH0D701207), 1.8 mM Na2HPO4 (Merck Emprove® Essential Cat No. 1.06585.1000 Lot No. K51666285026)} pH7.4. Different concentrations of HSA working solution of volume 1 ml have been prepared in PBS. HSA concentration used in the experiment 0 ug/ml, 20 ug/ml, 40 ug/ml, 60 ug/ml, 80 ug/ml, 100 ug/ml, 150 ug/ml, 200 ug/ml, 250 ug/ml, 300 ug/ml, 400 ug/ml, 600 ug/ml, 800 ug/ml, 1000 ug/ml, and 1200 ug/ml. To generate standard curve, three test cartridges for each concentration have been used. 170 ul of the working stock of HSA has been added to the cartridge tube C1 to perform the assay as described in 2.1.2. The RFU values obtained for each concentration have been plotted and a linear equation derived using Microsoft Excel. 3. Determination of LoB LoD and LoQ of the Proflo-U® platform. 3.1. To determine limit of blank (LoB) for the platform a matrix of 3 X 5 has been created, where cartridges from three different batches of production have been taken and the other is the number of test performed using cartridges from each batch. Therefore, a total number of data points n = 15 have been used. The 1X PBS solution has been used as the sample. The readout has been taken as concentration derived on the basis of the equation obtained with the standard curve generated. The limit of blank has been calculated with the following equation: - LoB = Mean of Blank + 1.645X Standard Deviation of Blank 3.2. To determine limit of detection (LoD) for the platform, a matrix 3 X 5 has been created, where cartridges from three different batches of production have been taken and the other is the number of test performed using cartridges from each batch. Therefore, a total number of data points n = 15 have been used. The 20 ug/ml concentration HSA solution has been used as the sample. The readout has been taken as concentration derived on the basis of the equation obtained with the standard curve generated in 2.3. The limit of detection has been calculated with the following equation ref: - LoD = LoB + 1.645 X Standard Deviation of low concentration sample 3.3. To determine limit of quantification (LoQ), a matrix has been designed with three different concentrations LoD concentration 20 ug/ml more than LoD and 30 ug/ml more than LoD stocks where each concentration was replicated n = 5 times. The mean and standard deviation were calculated for each set and determined the % coefficient of variance. The lowest concentration at which %CV< 10 has been considered as the LoQ. 4. Proflo-U® platform comparison with Beckman Coulter analyzer and microalbumin test kit. The urine spiked samples were tested in Beckman Coulter autoanalyzer using compatible microalbumin test kit according to manufacturer's protocol. The same spiked urine samples were tested on the Proflo-U® platform. The results were plotted and compared with the true value for percentage recovery.
RESULTS: The range of detection of Proflo-U platform is from 4 mg/dL to 100 mg/dL in the use format where the sample is diluted 10 times. The linearity of the curve has been found between 4 mg/dL and 60 mg/dL. The LoB has been found to be 2.05 mg/dL, LoD 3.98 mg/dL, and LoQ 5.0 mg/dL. The correlation of Proflo-U platform has been found to be 98% correlation with 95% confidence.
CONCLUSIONS: Proflo-U platform can be alternative to the lab micro-albumin test at point of care and self-health monitoring setup. Adoption of this new technology can boost the initiative of early diagnosis of kidney damage to stop progression into end-stage kidney disease.