Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Immunol. 2023 Mar 1;210(5):609–617. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2200463

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

Model for testing tolerogenic adjuvants. (A) Method for detecting TCR-transgenic (“DO11”) Treg (R1*R2*R3), TCR-transgenic Teff (R1*R2*R4), host Treg (R1*R2*R5), and host Teff (R1*R2*R6) cells in the model (see “Analysis of CD4+ T cell counts in the model”). Depicted are the cells from the DLN on day 5. (B) Counts of KJ1-26+ Treg and Teff cells in DLN, non-draining lymph nodes (“NLN”), and the spleen (“SP”) on day 5 versus day 1, as determined by the method in A. Data are mean ± SD of four experiments. Numbers on the top of the bars indicate the fold change in Teff counts since day 1. *p = 0.004 (two-sided t test); **p ≤ 0.0002, for the fold change in DLN versus NLN and SP (one-way ANOVA); nd, not determined due to low counts. (C) Method for CD44 analysis. Cells shown in A were additionally stained with FITC anti-CD44 and analyzed by the method in A. Numbers in the gates indicate percentages of the total CD4+ T cells. The R3 gate contains both KJ1-26+CD44+ Teff cells (FITC+; 0.22%) and KJ1-26+ Treg cells (Foxp3-eGFP+; 0.004%), as determined with an isotype-matched FITC control (not shown). Shown is one of two similar results. (D) Method for detecting Ki67+ Treg and Teff cells (see “Analysis of CD4+ T cell proliferation in the model”). Depicted are the cells from the DLN on day 5. Quadrant plots on the right are drawn based on the locations of the Ki67 subpopulation. Shown is one of two similar results.