Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 15;36(2):463–474. doi: 10.1007/s40620-022-01454-2

Table 3.

Permeability ratios for small intestinal permeability (0–2 h-L/R*103) distal small and proximal colonic permeability (2–5 h-S/E*103) and colonic permeability (5–24 h-S/E*103) in healthy controls, IgAN and non-IgAN GN patients

0–2 h-L/R*103 ratio 2–5 h-S/E*103 ratio 5–24 h-S/E*103 ratio
Healthy controls (n = 19) 21.66 ± 11.92 24.45 ± 14.63 21.56 ± 10.03

IgAN (n = 35)

CKD 1–2 (n = 16)

CKD 3–4 (n = 19)

29.74 ± 15.51

30.17 ± 15.43

29.38 ± 15.99

24.87 ± 12.60

25.32 ± 10.91

24.49 ± 14.15

17.59 ± 6.97

18.68 ± 6.71

16.68 ± 7.24

Non-IgAN GNs (n = 18)

CKD 1–2 (n = 13)

CKD 3–4 (n = 5)

36.77 ± 27.77#

27.04 ± 8.51

62.07 ± 44.19

29.53 ± 15.49

33.51 ± 15.76

19.16 ± 9.44

20.96 ± 14.36

23.52 ± 15.74

14.30 ± 7.53

Bold values indicate statistically significant differences at the 5% significance level. Exact p-values of the comparisons can be found in Fig. 1

L/R ratio ratio between lactulose and l-rhamnose, S/E ratio ratio between sucralose and erythritol, CKD chronic kidney disease, IgAN IgA Nephropathy. Values are presented as means and standard deviations

#p < 0.05 as compared to healthy controls