Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 31;112(3):334–342. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-02005-2

Table 2.

CMR data

Control
(n = 31)
Cardiac amyloidosis
(n = 24)
HCM
(n = 21)
HHD
(n = 80)
p value
IVSd, mm 10 ± 1 18 ± 4*‡ 17 ± 4*‡ 14 ± 2*†  < 0.0001
LVEDD, mm 50 ± 4 47 ± 5 47 ± 6 50 ± 5 0.0016
LVEDV index, mL/m2 55 ± 8 50 ± 11 51 ± 10 54 ± 15 0.42
LVESV index, mL/m2 18 ± 5 21 ± 8 15 ± 7 19 ± 9 0.15
SV index, mL/m2 36 ± 5 29 ± 8*†‡ 37 ± 9 35 ± 8 0.0026
EF, % 67 ± 6 58 ± 11*†‡ 71 ± 11 66 ± 9  < 0.0001
LV mass index, g/m2 52 ± 11 87 ± 22*‡ 87 ± 29* 73 ± 17*  < 0.0001
LGE present 0 24 (100%) 17 (81%) 29 (36%)  < 0.0001
LGE quantitative, % 0 55 ± 32*†‡ 10 ± 9 3 ± 6  < 0.0001
Native T1, ms 1225 ± 21 1409 ± 59*†‡ 1266 ± 44* 1257 ± 41*  < 0.0001
ECV, % 26 ± 3 51 ± 6*†‡ 30 ± 6 31 ± 6*  < 0.0001

Bold values indicate statistically significant p values with p< 0.05

Values are mean ± standard deviation or numbers (%). ECV data available for n = 12 (control), n = 22 (cardiac amyloidosis), n = 14 (HCM), n = 32 (HDD)

HCM hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; HHD hypertensive heart disease; IVSD inter-ventricular septum thickness at end-diastole; EF LV ejection fraction; ECV extracellular volume; LGE late gadolinium enhancement; LV left ventricle; LVEDD LV end-diastolic dimeter; LVEDV LV end-diastolic volume; LVESV LV end-diastolic volume; SV stroke volume

*p < 0.05 vs. control

p < 0.05 vs. HCM

p < 0.05 vs. HHD