Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 10;13(12):7897–7912. doi: 10.1039/d3ra00972f

Comparison of HPLC–log P and c log P data of ethyl and methyl 3,4-diaryl-1-(2-aryl-2-oxoethyl)-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxylates 6a–o and 7a–c.

Compound HPLC–log Pa c log Pb
Lamellarin O 4.00
Lukianol A 4.57
Lamellarin D 3.79
Lamellarin I 4.17
6a 4.381 ± 0.002 5.28
6b 4.468 ± 0.006 5.15
6c 4.453 ± 0.005 5.44
6d 4.711 ± 0.006 5.84
6e 3.803 ± 0.012 4.89
6f 4.462 ± 0.005 5.02
6g 4.531 ± 0.004 4.90
6h 4.531 ± 0.006 5.18
6i 4.784 ± 0.005 5.58
6j 4.490 ± 0.006 5.44
6k 4.546 ± 0.005 5.59
6l 4.499 ± 0.006 5.31
6m 4.545 ± 0.006 5.59
6n 4.564 ± 0.004 5.47
6o 4.598 ± 0.004 5.75
7a 4.279 ± 0.005 4.94
7b 4.347 ± 0.007 4.81
7c 4.327 ± 0.007 5.10
a

Data is provided as a mean value ± standard deviation (SD) of at least three independent experiments.

b

Calculated using ChemDraw 13.0.