Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 23;9:e42412. doi: 10.2196/42412

Table 3.

Learner networks.

Variable Overall (N=2185) LMICsa (N=384)
How did you learn about the course series?b, n (%)


Consortium promotion 378 (17.3) 170 (44.3)

Friend/colleague recommendation 186 (8.5) 83 (21.6)

Employer recommendation 658 (30.1) 78 (20.3)

Internet search 152 (7.0) 44 (11.5)

School requirement/recommendation 408 (18.7) 1 (0.3)

Social media 91 (4.2) 47 (12.2)

Other 347 (15.9) 23 (6.0)
Learners identifying organizational affiliation, n (%) 1,504 (68.8) 303 (78.9)

Learners at organizations with no other learners 669 (44.5) 186 (61.4)

Learners at organizations with 2-5 learners 238 (15.8) 53 (17.5)

Learners at organizations with 6-10 learners 106 (7.1) 35 (11.6)

Learners at organizations with 11-30 learners 143 (9.5) 29 (9.6)

Learners at organizations with >30 learners 348 (23.1) 0 (0.0)
Unique organizations identified by learners, n 779 221
Organizations with two or more learners, n 110 35
Learners per organization among organizations with two or more learners, mean (SD) 7.6 (14.4) 4.9 (4.1)

aLMICs: low- and middle-income countries.

bEnrollees could select multiple ways of learning about the course series, and hence, percentages do not add to 100.