Fungi Pleosporales Phaeosphaeriaceae RenGuang-CongTibprommaSaowaluckDongKai-XuanGaoChen-XiZhangChao-ShanKarunarathnaSamantha C.ElgorbanAbdallah M.GuiHengUnveiling fungi associated with Castanopsis woody litter in Yunnan Province, China: Insights into Pleosporales (Dothideomycetes) speciesMycoKeys22082024108154510.3897/mycokeys.108.127560 CEB03285-7CA4-5B1C-B15D-01062F4A87E4 Paraphoma aquatica Index Fungorum number: IF841364 FacesofFungi number: FoF15844 Magaña-Dueñas, Stchigel & Cano-Lira Journal of Fungi 7(12, no. 1102): 9 (2021)Fig. 9Description.

Saprobic on dead woody twigs of Castanopsisdelavayi (Fagaceae). Sexual morph: Ascomata 110–130 × 120–130 μm (x̄ = 122 × 126 μm, n = 5), solitary, scattered, erumpent to immersed, uni-loculate, globose to subglobose, black. Ostioles central. Peridium 7–12 μm wide, thin, comprising 3–4 layers of light brown to brown cells of textura prismatica. Hamathecium 1.5–2.5 μm wide, cylindrical, filiform, hyaline, septate, branched, cellular pseudoparaphyses, embedded in a gelatinous matrix. Asci 45–63 × 9–11 μm (x̄ = 55 × 9.5 μm, n = 20), 8-spored, bitunicate, fissitunicate, clavate, slightly broad at center, apically rounded, with short and rounded pedicel, minute ocular chamber. Ascospores 19–22 × 4–4.6 μm (x̄ = 20.7 × 4.2 μm, n = 30), overlapping, biseriate, hyaline, narrowly fusiform, straight or slightly curved, with 3 transverse septa, enlarged at the second cell, constricted at the septa, smooth-walled, guttulate, without a mucilaginous sheath. Asexual morph: see Magaña-Dueñas et al. (2021).

10.3897/mycokeys.108.127560.figure9A9397420-789F-59A7-B9AB-D08DA5A162F3

Paraphomaaquatica (HKAS 122713) a host b ascomata on the host surface c vertical section of ascoma d ostiole e peridium f pseudoparaphyses g–i asci j–m ascospores n germinated ascospore o, p culture characters on PDA (o = from above, p = from below). Scale bars: 50 µm (c); 30 µm (d, e); 10 µm (f, j–n); 20 µm (g–i); 20 mm (o, p).

https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1118837
Culture characteristics.

Ascospores germinated on PDA within 24 h at room temperature (25 °C). Germ tubes produced from the basal and apical cells of ascospore. Colonies on PDA, reaching 25 mm diameter after 2 weeks at 20–25 °C, mycelia superficial, medium density mycelia, entire margin, umbonate at center, band, rough surface, velvety, raised, grayish yellow, white mycelium attached to the central surface; reverse atrovirens.

Material examined.

China, Yunnan Province, Baoshan (25°18'48"N, 99°09'50"E), on dead woody twigs of Castanopsisdelavayi (Fagaceae), 12 July 2020, G.C. Ren, BS42 (HKAS 122713), living culture KUNCC 21-0523.

Known host, habitats, and distribution.

Capafonts and Castanopsisdelavayi, freshwater submerged plant debris and terrestrial, China and Spain (Magaña-Dueñas et al. 2021; this study).

Notes.

Multi-loci phylogenetic analyses based on a concatenated LSU, ITS, tef1-α, rpb2, and tub2 sequence dataset show that our new collection (KUNCC 21-0523) formed a sister lineage to the ex-type strain of Paraphomaaquatica (FMR 16956) with solid support (100% ML and 1.00 BYPP, Fig. 4). Sequence comparison for the ITS region between Paraphomabaoshanenses (KUNCC 21-0523) and P.aquatica (FMR 16956) showed a 6.17% (30/486 bp) base pair difference, 0.12% (2/848 bp) base pair difference for LSU region, 2.06% (9/437 bp) base pair difference for the tef1-α region. Unfortunately, the morphology could not be compared as Paraphomaaquatica was reported in its asexual morph with no information on its sexual morph (Magaña-Dueñas et al. 2021). The species of Paraphoma were introduced from its asexual morph (Morgan-Jones and White 1983; de Gruyter et al. 2010; Quaedvlieg et al. 2013; Moslemi et al. 2016, 2018; Crous et al. 2017, 2021a, 2021b; Gomzhina et al. 2020; Magaña-Dueñas et al. 2021; Guarnaccia et al. 2022), while we introduced our new collection from its sexual morph. Therefore, we could not compare our new collection with other Paraphoma species. However, based on the phylogenetic distinctiveness, we introduce our collection as the first record of P.aquatica from Castanopsisdelavayi (Fagaceae) in China, and our species is the first sexual morph recorded in this genus.

10.3897/mycokeys.108.127560.figure494BB71B7-E53A-5259-8718-926FBA43471B

Phylogram generated from maximum likelihood analysis based on the combined LSU, ITS, tef1-α, rpb2 and tub2 dataset of Paraphoma species. Related sequences were obtained from previous publications (Magaña-Dueñas et al. 2021, Guarnaccia et al. 2022, and Gomzhina et al. 2020). Bootstrap values for ML are equal to or greater than 75%, and posterior probability values are equal to or greater than 0.95 from the BYPP analysis labelled on the nodes. Strains of the newly described species are in red, while type strains are in bold. The tree is rooted with Setophomaterrestris (CBS 335.29).

https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1118832
Magaña-DueñasVCano-LiraJFStchigelAM (2021) New Dothideomycetes from freshwater habitats in Spain.Journal of Fungi (Basel, Switzerland)7(12): 1102. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7121102GuarnacciaVMartinoITaboneGCrousPWGullinoML (2022) Paraphomagaribaldii sp. nov. causing leaf spot disease of Campanularapunculoides in Italy.Fungal Systematics and Evolution9(1): 1926. https://doi.org/10.3114/fuse.2022.09.03GomzhinaMMGasichELKhlopunovaLBGannibalPB (2020) Paraphoma species associated with Convolvulaceae.Mycological Progress19(3): 185194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-020-01558-8Morgan-JonesGWhiteJF (1983) Studies in the genus Phoma. iii: Paraphoma, a new genus to accomodate Phomaradicina 1983.Mycotaxon18: 5765.de GruyterJWoudenbergJHCAveskampMMVerkleyGJMGroenewaldJZCrousPW (2010) Systematic reappraisal of species in PhomasectionParaphoma, Pyrenochaeta and Pleurophoma.Mycologia102(5): 10661081. https://doi.org/10.3852/09-240QuaedvliegWVerkleyGJMShinHDBarretoRWAlfenasACSwartWJGroenewaldJZCrousPW (2013) Sizing up septoria.Studies in Mycology75: 307390. https://doi.org/10.3114/sim0017MoslemiAAdesPKGroomTCrousPWNicolasMETaylorPWJ (2016) Paraphoma crown rot of pyrethrum (Tanacetumcinerariifolium).Plant Disease100(12): 23632369. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-05-16-0628-REMoslemiAAdesPKCrousPWGroomTScottJBNicolasMETaylorPWJ (2018) Paraphomachlamydocopiosa sp. nov. and Paraphomapye sp. nov., two new species associated with leaf and crown infection of pyrethrum.Plant Pathology67(1): 124135. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12719CrousPWWingfieldMJBurgessTIHardyGEStJBarberPAAlvaradoPBarnesCWBuchananPKHeykoopMMorenoG (2017) Fungal Planet description sheets: 558–624.Persoonia38: 240384. https://doi.org/10.3767/003158517X698941CrousPWOsieckERJurjevićŽBoersJvan IperenALStarink-WillemseMDimaBBalashovSBulgakovTSJohnstonPRMorozovaOVPinruanUSommaiSAlvaradoPDecockCALebelTMcMullan-FisherSMorenoGShivasRGZhaoLAbdollahzadehJAbrinbanaMAgeevDVAkhmetovaGAlexandrovaAVAltésAAmaralAGGAngeliniCAntonínVArenasFAsselmanPBadaliFBaghelaABañaresABarretoRWBaseiaIGBellangerJMBerraf-TebbalABiketovaAYuBukharovaNVBurgessTICaberoJCâmaraMPSCano-LiraJFCeryngierPChávezRCowanDAde LimaAFOliveiraRLDenmanSDangQNDovanaFDuarteIGEichmeierAErhardAEsteve-RaventósFFellinAFerisinGFerreiraRJFerrerAFinyPGayaEGeeringADWGil-DuránCGlässnerováKGlushakovaAMGramajeDGuardFEGuarnizoALHaelewatersDHallingREHillRHirookaYHubkaVIliushinVAIvanovaDDIvanushkinaNEJangsantearPJustoAKachalkinAVKatoSKhamsuntornPKirtsideliIYKnappDGKochkinaGAKoukolOKovácsGMKruseJKumarTKAKušanILæssøeTLarssonELebeufRLevicánGLoizidesMMarinhoPLuangsa-ardJJLukinaEGMagaña-DueñasVMaggs-KöllingGMalyshevaEFMalyshevaVFMartínBMartínMPMatočecNMcTaggartARMehrabi-KoushkiMMešićAMillerANMironovaPMoreauP-AMorteAMüllerKNagyLGNanuS (2021a) Fungal Planet description sheets: 1284–1382.Persoonia47: 178374. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.06CrousPWHernández-RestrepoMSchumacherRKCowanDAMaggs-KöllingGMaraisEWingfieldMJYilmazNAdanOCGAkulovADuarteEBerraf-TebbalABulgakovTSCarnegieAJde BeerZWDecockCDijksterhuisJDuongTAEichmeierAHienLTHoubrakenJAMPKhanhTNLiemNVLombardLLutzoniFMMiadlikowskaJMNelWJPascoeIGRoetsFRouxJSamsonRAShenMSpetikMThangavelRThanhHMThaoLDvan NieuwenhuijzenEJZhangJQZhangYZhaoLLGroenewaldJZ (2021b) New and Interesting Fungi. 4.Fungal Systematics and Evolution7(1): 255343. https://doi.org/10.3114/fuse.2021.07.13