Supporting information for Harr et al. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 10.1073/pnas.202336899
Table 7. Results of likelihood ratio test [Kim, Y. & Stephan, W. (2002) Genetics 160, 765777]
Simulation | C = 4Nr | q | Option 1 (derived alleles/non-derived alleles distinguished) | Option 2 (derived alleles/non-derived alleles not distinguished) | ||||||
LR | 2Ns | X | s | LR | 2Ns | X | s | |||
Sweep region 1 | ||||||||||
1* | 0.0185 | 0.0087 | 84.2 | 9035.1 | 2491474 | 0.0045 | 85.8 | 10728.7 | 2491442 | 0.0054 |
2 | 0.0185 | 0.0043 | 36.0 | 5604.9 | 2487488 | 0.0028 | 35.0 | 6626.9 | 2487344 | 0.0033 |
3 | 0.0185 | 0.0173 | 195.0 | 13422.0 | 2491535 | 0.0067 | 200.4 | 15789.9 | 2491480 | 0.0079 |
4 | 0.0093 | 0.0087 | 84.2 | 4071.8 | 2491449 | 0.0020 | 85.7 | 4940.4 | 2491437 | 0.0025 |
5 | 0.037 | 0.0087 | 84.2 | 19468.2 | 2491405 | 0.0097 | 85.7 | 23149.7 | 2491526 | 0.0116 |
Sweep region 2 | ||||||||||
1* | 0.0185 | 0.0087 | 23.6 | 1083.0 | 2661027 | 0.0005 | 22.3 | 957.3 | 2661004 | 0.0005 |
2 | 0.0185 | 0.0043 | 9.19 | 291.9 | 2661024 | 0.0001 | 8.44 | 281.5 | 2661053 | 0.0001 |
3 | 0.0185 | 0.0173 | 64.8 | 3426.9 | 2662380 | 0.0017 | 61.2 | 2550.9 | 2661132 | 0.0013 |
4 | 0.0093 | 0.0087 | 23.5 | 447.6 | 2661012 | 0.0002 | 22.3 | 422.3 | 2661104 | 0.0002 |
5 | 0.037 | 0.0087 | 23.5 | 2914.2 | 2660930 | 0.0015 | 22.3 | 2131.4 | 2661118 | 0.0011 |
X
, position of selected mutation on the chromosome (according to release 2 of the complete Drosophila genome); s, selection coefficient; LR, likelihood ratio.*Standard parameter, estimated from non-African polymorphism in frag.1, frag.4, and frag.7.
All simulations fitted the hitchhiking model significantly better than the neutral model [P (LR) < 0.05].
Based on an effective population size (Ne) of 106.