Faucher et al. 10.1073/pnas.0509183103.

Supporting Information

Files in this Data Supplement:

Supporting Figure 4
Supporting Figure 5
Supporting Table 1
Supporting Table 2
Supporting Figure 6
Supporting Table 3
Supporting Figure 7
Supporting Table 4
Supporting Figure 8
Supporting Table 5




Supporting Figure 4

Fig. 4. Number of detected genes for each of the conditions after three rounds of selective capture of transcribed sequences (SCOTS) (bars) compared to the number of bacteria (D ).





Supporting Figure 5

Fig. 5.

 Comparative genomic hybridization of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi strain ISP1820 versus strain CT18. Absent region in strain ISP1820 are annotated as in ref. 1.

 

1. Boyd, E. F., Porwollik, S., Blackmer, F. & McClelland, M. (2003) J. Clin. Microbiol. 41, 3823–3828.





Supporting Figure 6

Fig. 6.

 Venn diagram of genes scored as repressed (a) or expressed (b) induced at T2, T8, or T24 compared to supernatant (ANOVA, Bonferoni correction, P < 0.001 and ± 2-fold change).

 





Supporting Figure 7

Fig. 7.

 Number of genes (%) that are overexpressed significantly (open bars) or repressed (filled bars) in functional class (Welcome Trust Sanger Center; www.sanger.ac.uk/Projects/S_typhi/St_gene_list_hierarchical.shtml) for T0 (A), T2 (B), T8 (C), and T24 (D) compared to supernatant.

 





Supporting Figure 8

Fig. 8.

 Flow chart of the SCOTS procedure. For more detailed information, see ref. 1.

 

1. Daigle, F., Hou, J. Y. & Clark-Curtiss, J. E. (2002) Methods Enzymol. 358, 108–122.