Table A Included studies

Table B Excluded studies (posted as supplied by author)

References for tables of included and excluded studies
 

Table A Included studies (posted as supplied by author)
 
Study Methods Participants  Interventions Outcomes Notes Allocation concealment
             
Ausili-Cefaro 1999 (w1) Randomised controlled trial

Open

(No patients recruited)

Breast Cancer

>70 yrs age
Eligible for 2nd line hormone Tx or chemo 

Painful bony metastases with no previous radiotherapy

A – Pamidronate 
90 mg IV 2 hrs in 250 ml Nsaline x 9 
(+ Radiotherapy)

B – Control gp

Radiotherapy

Protocol only – no results. 

Pathological #

SCC 

Hypercalcaemia

 
B
             
             
Belch 1991 (w2) Randomised controlled trial 

Double blind

166 patients

104 M / 62 F

Multiple myeloma

No previous chemo (steroids or radiotherapy allowed)

A – Etidronate 

5-20 mg/kg/day PO to death or withdrawal

B – Placebo 

Chemo, (melphalan, prednisolone)

Median time on study:
44.4 mths 

Pathological # (C):

A 20/92; B 21/74; p <0.368

Hypercalcaemia:
A 23/92; B 14/74; p <0.453

Survival :
NS

Also measured vertebral index (NS)

Bone pain

Progression of bony metastases

A
             
             
Berenson 1996 (w3)

Berenson 1998(a) (w4)

Berenson 1998(b) (w5)

Randomised controlled trial 

Double blind 

392 patients

217 M / 137 F

Multiple myeloma

Durie Salmon stage III, at least 1 osteolytic lesion

Stratified by 1st line chemo or 2nd+ line chemo

A – Pamidronate 

90 mg IV 4 hrs 500 ml 5% Dextrose every 4 wks x 9
 

B – Placebo 

500 ml 5% Dextrose IV 4 hrs

Outcomes measured at: 3,6,9,12,15,18,21 mths 

Pathological # (C,V):
(C) 21 mths A 62/196; B 66/181; p < 0.330

(V) 21 mths A 31/196; B 49/181; p <0.008

Radiotherapy: 
21 mths A 50/196; B 61/181; p <0.090

SCC:
NS

Ortho procedure: 
NS 

Hypercalcaemia:
21 mths A 18/196; B 16/181; p <1.000

Time to 1st SRE: 
p <0.016 (log-rank test) 

Survival [median]: 
NS. 26 vs 24 mths, p <0.377

ECOG 9 mths

QUAL (Spitzer index) 9 mths

Pain and analgesic use 9 mths

A
             
             
Berenson 2001(a) (w6)

Berenson 2001(b) (w7)

Randomised controlled trial 

Double blind

280 patients

67 M / 213 F

Breast cancer & multiple myeloma

All pts at least 1 osteolytic lesion 

Myeloma pts: previous SRE or failed 1st line chemo
 
 

 

A – Zoledronate 

0.4 mg IV 5 mins in 50 ml Nsaline every 4 wks

B – Zoledronate 

2 mg IV 5 mins in 50 ml Nsaline every 4 wks

C – Zoledronate 

4 mg IV 5 mins in 50 ml Nsaline every 4 wks

D – Pamidronate 

90 mg IV 2 hrs in 250 ml Nsaline every 4 wks

Outcomes measured at: 
10 mths

Pathological # (C):
A 19/68; B 16/72; C 14/67; D 15/73; p <0.723

Radiotherapy:
A 16/68; B 14/72; C 14/67; D 13/73; p <0.857

SCC:
A 1/68; B 0/72; C 2/67; D 2/73; p <0.545

Ortho procedure: 
A 5/68; B 2/72; C 2/67; D 3/73; p <0.547

Hypercalcaemia: 
A 5/68; B 2/72; C 0/67; D 2/73; p <0.103

Time to 1st SRE: 
p <0.05 D vs A

Survival: Not recorded

ECOG

Pain and analgesic scores

Bone mineral density

B
             
             
Brinker 1998 (w8) Randomised controlled trial

Double blind

304 patients 

160 M / 140 F

Multiple myeloma

Stratified by: randomized to interferon, not randomized to interferon, not eligible for interferon

A – Pamidronate 

300 mg/day PO to withdrawal, death or end of trial

B – Placebo 

Chemo (melphalan, prednisolone)

Median (range) time on study 544 (4-1702) vs 551 (2-1659) days

Outcomes: number of EVENTS

Pathological # (N,V): 
(N) A 28/152; B 40/148; 

p <0.098

(V) A 84/152; B 99/148; 

p <0.044

Radiotherapy: 
A 45/152; B 62/148; p <0.030

Ortho procedure: 
A 5/152; B 11/148; p <0.129

Hypercalcaemia: 
A 11/152; B 22/148; p <0.042

Time to 1st SRE [median]:
NS 440 vs 414 days p <0.33

Survival [median]:
NS 1183 vs 1063 days p <0.9

Progression of bony metastases

Pain and analgesic use

Height
 
 

 

B
             
             
Conte 1996 (w9)

Conte 1994 (w10)

Ford 1996 (w11)

Randomised controlled trial 

Open 

295 (F) patients

Breast Cancer

Osteolytic or mixed metastases

Progressive disease at entry and eligible for 1st line chemo. No restriction on amount of previous hormonal Tx

A – Pamidronate 

45 mg IV 1 hr in 250 ml Nsaline every 3 wks until progressive disease

B – Control 

No treatment

Median follow-up 249 vs 168 days

Outcomes: Number of EVENTS

Pathological # (C): 
A 34/143; B 32/152; p <0.580 

Radiotherapy:
A 66/143; B 83/152; p <0.163

Ortho procedure: 
A 4/143; B 8/152; p <0.380

Hypercalcaemia: 
A 8/143; B 13/152; p <0.371

Time to 1st SRE [median]: 
NS, 533 vs 490 days

Survival [median]: 

NS, 592 vs 642 days

Performance status (WHO)

Pain and analgesic use

Time to progressive bony disease

A
             
             
Daragon 1993 (w12) Randomised controlled trial

Double blind

104 patients 

44 M / 50 M

Multiple myeloma

Durie-Salmon stage II or III

A – Etidronate 

10 mg/kg/day oral for 4 mths

B – Placebo

Outcomes measured at:
4 mths

Pathological # (C): 
A 2/49; B 1/45; p <1.000

Hypercalcaemia:
NS

Survival [median]:
NS, 43 vs 46 mths

Also measured vertebal index: NS

Progression of bony metastases

Pain and analgesic use

Performance status (Karnofsky)

Not included in meta-analysis as < 6 mths

B
             
             
Delmas 1982 (w13) Randomised controlled trial

Double blind

13 patients

Multiple myeloma

Excluded if >10 courses chemo on entry

A – Clodronate 

1.6 g/day oral for 18 mths

B – Placebo

Outcomes measured at:

6-18 mths (4 pts 6mths, 5 pts 12mths, 4 pts 18mths)

Pathological # (N,V):

(N) A 0/7; B 3/6; p <0.103

(V) A 1/7; B 4/6; p < 0.070

Hypercalcaemia: 

A 1/7; B 0/6; p <1.000

Progression of bony disease

Bone pain

Bone Histomorpho-metry

B
             
             
Diel 1999 (w14) Randomised controlled trial

Open

361 patients

Breast cancer

A – Clodronate

2.4 g/day oral 

B –Clodronate

900 mg IV every 3 wks

C – Pamidronate

60 mg IV every 3 wks

Median time on study:

18 mths

Pathological # (V):
A 11/112; B 19/103; C 16/103; p <0.183

Meeting Abstract 

Bone pain

B
             
             
Elomaa 1983 (w15)

Elomaa 1987 (w16)

Elomaa 1988 (w17)

Randomised controlled trial 

Double blind

34 (F) patients 

Breast Cancer

Pts with bone metastases that had progressed on hormone therapy and chemo 

A – Clodronate 

1.6-3.2 g/day oral for 3-9 mths

B – Placebo

Outcomes measured at:
12 mths

Pathological # (N): 
A 1/17; B 4/17; p <0.335

Radiotherapy:
A 3/17; B 10/17; p <0.032

Hypercalcaemia:
A 1/17; B 4/17; p <0.335

Survival:
NS. 14/17 vs 9/17 patients alive at 12 mths

Analgesic use

Disease progression (new bone mets)

(16) reports data on 1 yr follow-up period post Tx

B
             
             
Glover 1994 (w18) Randomised controlled trial

Open

61 (F) patients

Breast Cancer

Painful bony metastases

Excluded pt with history of fracture, SCC, hypercalcaemia within 3 mths

A – Pamidronate 

30 mg IV 4 hrs every 2 wks x 6

B – Pamidronate 

60 mg IV 4 hrs every 4 wks x 3

C – Pamidronate

60 mg IV 4 hrs every 2 wks x 6

D – Pamidronate 

90 mg IV 6 hrs every 4 wks x 3

Outcome measured at:
3 mths

Pathological # (C): 
NS, two events

Radiotherapy:
NS, one event

Hypercalcaemia: 
No events

Pain and analgesic use

Progression of bony disease

Not comparable with other studies – all patients on pamidronate at different dosing regimens for 3/12

B
             
             
Gomez-Pastrana 1996 (w19) Randomised controlled trial

Double blind

28 (F) patients

Breast Cancer

A - Clodronate 

300 mg/d IV for 5 d followed by 1600 mg/d oral for 6 mths

B - Placebo

Outcomes measured at:
6 mths 

Pathological # 

Hypercalcaemia

Pain study

No data on skeletal morbidity outcomes in text

A
             
             
Harris 1993 (w20) Randomised controlled trial 

Open

72 (F) patients

Breast cancer

A – Pamidronate 

30 mg IV every 3 wks for 3 mths

B – Control gp

Outcomes measured at:
3 mths

Pathological # (C): 
A 3/36; B 3/36; p < 1.000

Radiotherapy:
A 10/36; B 15/36; p <0.322

SCC: 
A 2/36; B 2/36; p < 1.000

Hypercalcaemia: 

A 2/36; B 0/36; p <0.493 

Survival: 
NS 

Meeting Abstract

Data not included in meta-analysis as < 6 mths

B
             
             
Heim 1995 (w21)

Clemens 1993 (w22)

Randomised controlled trial

Open

170 patients

77 M / 80 F

Multiple myeloma

Stratified by Durie-Salmon stage and presence of osteolytic metastases

A – Clodronate 

1.6 mg/day oral for 12 mths

B – Control gp

Outcomes measured:
Pathological #

Hypercalcaemia
 
 
 
 

 

Pain and analgesic use

Progression of bony disease

Data not extractable in format for this review therefore results not included

A
             
             
Holten-Verzantvoort 1993 (w23)

Holten-Verzantvoort 1987 (w24)

Cleton 1989 (w25)

Holten-Verzantvoort 1991 (w26)

Randomised controlled trial

Open

205 (F) patients

Breast Cancer

A – Pamidronate 

300-600 mg/day oral to death or withdrawal

B – Control

No treatment

Median (range) time in study: 18 (1-66) vs 21 (1-53) mths

Pathological # (C):
A 6/81; B 10/80 p <0.305 

Radiotherapy: 
A 22/81; B 43/80 p <0.001

Ortho procedure: 
A 4/81; 8/80; p <0.247

Hypercalcaemia: 
A 4/81; B 17/80; p <0.002

Time to 1st SRE [median]: 
NS, 14 vs 11 mths, p <0.10

Survival [median]: 
NS, 25 vs 24 mths, p <0.98

There were problems with study methodology and changes of dose in treatment group due to GI toxicity therefore data from this study not included in meta-analysis
B
             
             
Hortobagyi 1998 (w27)

Hortobagyi 1996 (w28)
 
 

 

Randomised controlled trial 

Double blind

382 (F) patients

Breast Cancer

Stage IV breast ca, on chemo, at least 1 osteolytic metastasis >1cm diameter

Stratified by ECOG

A – Pamidronate 

90 mg IV 2 hrs in 250 ml 5% Dextrose every 3-4 wks x 24

B – Placebo

250 ml 5% Dextrose IV 2 hrs every 3-4 wks x 24

Outcome measured at: 3,6,9,12,15,18,21,24 mths

Pathological # (N,V,C):
(N) 24 mths A 42/185; B 74/197; p <0.002

(V) 24 mths A 47/185; B 51/197; p <1.000

(C) 24 mths A 67/185; B 96/197; p <0.017

Radiotherapy:
24 mths A 51/185; B 88/197; p <0.001

SCC: 
24 mths A 4/185; B 7/197; 

p <0.545

Ortho procedure:
24 mths A 9/185; B 24/197; 

p <0.017

Hypercalcaemia:
24 mths A 13/185; B 30/197; p <0.017

Time to 1st SRE [median]:
13.9 vs 7 mths p <0.001

Survival [median]: 
NS, 14.8 vs 14.0 mths 

p <0.82

ECOG

QUAL

Bone pain and analgesic use

Radiological response in bone

A
             
             
Hultborn 1999 (w29)

Hultborn 1996 (w30)
 
 

 

Randomised controlled trial 

Double blind

404 (F) patients

Breast Cancer

Pts entered at diagnosis of skeletal spread or on change of systemic Tx due to disease progression

A – Pamidronate 

60 mg IV 1 hr in 500 ml Nsaline every 3-4 wks x 24

B – Placebo 

500 ml Nsaline IV 1 hr every 3-4 wks x 24

Median time on study:
12 vs 11.5 mths

Pathological # (N):

A 30/201; B 31/203; p <1.000

Radiotherapy:
A 54/201; B 65/203; p <0.276

SCC:
A 5/201; B 6/203; p <1.000

Ortho procedure:

A 12/201; B 17/203; p <0.441

Hypercalcaemia:
A 5/201; B 17/203; p <0.014

Time to 1st SRE [median]:
11.8 vs 8.4 mths p <0.006

Survival [median]:

NS, 18.3 mths

Performance status (WHO)

Pain and analgesic score

A
             
             
I – Kraj 2000 (a) (w31)

I – Kraj 2000 (b) (w32)

Randomised controlled trial

Open

46 patients

26 M / 20 F

Multiple myeloma

All receiving chemo

A – Pamidronate

60 mg IV over 4 hrs every 4 wks

B – Control

Standard chemo 

Outcomes measured at:
12, 21 mths

Pathological # : individual data not given

Radiotherapy : individual data not given

SCC : individual data not given

Hypercalcaemia:
NS

Survival [median]:
NS, 20 vs 19 mths p <0.45

ECOG

Pain and analgesic use

Progression of bone mets

Mean SRE/yr (#,DXT,SCC) Sig p<0.013

B
             
             
Kristensen 1999 (w33) Randomised controlled trial 

Open 

100 (F) patients

Breast cancer

Untreated or 1st line treatment for <6 mths

A – Clodronate 

1.6-3.2 g/day oral for 24 mths

B – Control gp

Only recorded FIRST SRE for each patient.

Pathological # (N, V, C):
(C) A 3/49; B 13/51; p <0.013

Radiotherapy:
A 8/49; B 4/51; p <0.230

Hypercalcaemia:
A 3/49; B 4/51; p <1.000

Time to 1st SRE: 
p <0.015

Survival [median (95%CI)]:
NS, 18.3 (16.3-20.3) vs 18.0 (15.7-20.2) mths

WHO performance status

QUAL – Eortc-30 + HADS

Pain and analgesic use

Time to progressive bony metastases

Time to 1st SRE and survival included in analyses. 

B
             
             
Lahtinen 1992 (w34)

Laasko 1994 (w35)

Randomised controlled trial 

Double blind

350 patients

166 M / 170 F

Multiple myeloma

Pts newly diagnosed, commenced on melphalan-prednisolone

A – Clodronate 

2.4 g/day oral for 24 mths

B – Placebo 

Outcome measured at: 
24 mths

Pathological # (N,V):
(N) A 26/108; B22/95; 

p <1.000

(V) A 33/108; B 38/95; 

p <0.185

Hypercalcemia

NS 

203/350 pts had baseline and follow-up x-rays therefore data not included in meta-analysis

Pain and analgesic use

Progression of bony lesion

(35) is a subset analysis looking at cost data

B
             
             
Lipton 2000 (w36)

Theriault 1996 (w37)

Randomised controlled trial 

Double blind

754 (F) patients

Breast Cancer

    Pooled results from Hortobagyi 1998 and Theriault 1999 Trials considered individually as shown
A
             
             
Martoni 1991 (w38) Randomised controlled trial

Double blind for 1 wk then open

38 (F) patients 

Breast cancer

Progressive disease

Stratified by type of bone metastases (osteolytic, osteoblastic, mixed), systemic treatment (chemo vs hormonal)

A – Clodronate 

300 mg/day IV 3 hrs in 250 ml Nsaline for 1 wk, followed by 100 mg/day IM for 3 wks followed by 100 mg/alt days IM for 2 mths

B – Control

250 ml/day Nsaline 3 hrs IV for 1 wk followed by standard care

Outcomes measured at:
3 mths 

Pathological # (C): 
A 0/17; B 2/16; p <0.103

Hypercalcaemia:
A 1/17; B 3/16; p <0.335

Pain and analgesic use

Number of bony metastases

Data not included in meta-analysis as < 6 mths

B
             
             
McCloskey 1998 (w39) Randomised controlled trial 

Double blind

614 patients

318 M / 218 F

Multiple myeloma

Excluded if previous chemo

A – Clodronate 

1.6 g/day oral for 24 mths

B – Placebo 

Median time on study 33.6 mths

Pathological # (N,V): 
(N) A 15/264; B 29/272; 

p <0.041

(V) A 41/264; B 60/272; 

p <0.060

Radiotherapy:
NS 

Hypercalcaemia: 
A 39/264; B 48/272; p <0.413

Time to 1st SRE:
NS

Survival [median (95%CI)]: 
NS, p <0.74, OR 0.97

2.9 (2.4-3.4) vs 2.8 (2.5-3.5) yr

Performance status

QUAL

Pain

Height

A
             
             
Paterson 1993 (w40) Randomised controlled trial 

Double blind

173 (F) patients

Breast cancer

A – Clodronate 

1.6 g/day oral for 36 mths

B – Placebo

Median time on study 14 vs 14.5 mths

Pathological # (N, V):
(N) A 19/85; B 24/88; 

p <0.486

(V) A 38/85; B 46/88; 

p <0.363

Radiotherapy:
A 34/85; B 42/88; p <0.359

Hypercalcaemia:
A 20/85; B 31/88; p <0.099

Time to 1st SRE:
NS

Survival:
35% vs 14% patients alive at 2 yrs

 
A
             
             
Robertson 1995 (w41) Randomised controlled trial 

Double blind

55 patients

All cancer types

Bone pain secondary to progressive bony disease, failed first line antitumour therapy

A – Clodronate 

1.6 g/day oral

B – Placebo

Median (range) time on study 8 (0.7-17.3) mths

Pathological # (C): 
A 4/27; B 2/28; p <0.422

SCC: 
A 0/27; B 3/28; p <0.236

Hypercalcaemia: 
A 0/27; B 2/28; p <0.491

Survival [median (range)]:
NS, 240 (25-518) vs 240 (20-486) days

 
B
             
             
Theriault 1999 (w42) Randomised controlled trial

Double blind

372 (F) patients

Breast Cancer

Pts on stable hormonal Tx

2 osteolytic metastases or 1 osteolytic (>1cm diameter) + extraskeletal metastases

Stratified by ECOG score

A – Pamidronate 

90 mg IV 2 hrs in 250 ml 5% Dextrose every 3-4 wks x 24

B – Placebo

250 ml 5% Dextrose IV 2 hrs every 3-4 wks x 24

Outcome measures at: 6,12,18,24 mths

Pathological # (N, V, C):
(N) 24 mths A 66/182; B 75/189; p <0.522

(V) 24 mths A 50/182; B 58/189; p <0.568

(C) 24 mths A 81/182; B 102/189; p <0.078

Radiotherapy:
24 mths A 56/182; B 76/189; p <0.065

SCC:
24 mths A 7/182; B 6/189; 

p <0.783

Ortho procedure: 
24 mths A 13/182; B 20/189; p <0.277 

Hypercalcaemia:
24 mths A 8/182; B 19/189; 

p <0.045

Time to 1st SRE [median]:
10.4 vs 6.9 mths p <0.049

Survival [median (95%CI)]: 
23.2 (19.3-25.8) vs 23.5 (18.7-27.4) p <0.685

ECOG

QUAL

Bone pain and analgesic use

A
             
             
Tubiana-Hulin 2001 (w43)

Hulin 1994 (w44)

Randomised controlled trial

Double blind

144 (F) patients

Breast cancer

A – Clodronate 

1.6 g/day PO for 12 mths

B – Placebo

Only recorded FIRST SRE for each patient

Pathological # (C):
A 8/73; B 7/71; p <1.000

Radiotherapy:
A 7/73; B 13/71; p <0.153

Hypercalcaemia:
A 0/73; B 4/71; p <0.057

Time to 1st SRE [median (range)]:
18.1 (1.2-12.2) vs 6 (1.1-12.2) mths 

p <0.05 

Time to progressive bony metastases

Time to 1st SRE included in analyses. 

B
             
             
Unpublished data A (w45)

Rosen 2002 (w46)

Randomised controlled trial

Double blind

773 patients

Solid tumours excluding breast/prostate

A- Zoledronate 8/4mg IV every 3 wks for 9 mths

B – Zoledronate 4mg IV every 3 wks for 9 mths

C - Placebo

Outcome measured at:
9 mths

Pathological # (N,V,C):
(N) A 21/266; B 26/257; C 29/250

(V) A 13/266;B 20/257; C 30/250

(C) A 31/266; B 40/257; C 53/250

Radiotherapy:
A 70/266; B 69/257; C 81/250

SCC:
A 7/266; B 7/257; C 10/250

Ortho procedure:
A 14/266; B 11/257; C 9/250

Hypercalcaemia:
A 2/266; B 0/257; C 8/250

Time to 1st SRE [median]:

A 7.2; B 7.56; C 5.1 mths

Performance status

QUAL

Bone pain and analgesic use

A
             
             
Unpublished data B (w47)

Rosen 2001 (w48)

Randomised controlled trial

Double blind

1648 patients

Breast cancer and multiple myeloma

A – Zoledronate 8/4mg IV every 3-4 wks for 12 mths 

B – Zoledronate 4mg IV every 3-4 wks for 12 mths

C – Pamidronate 90mg IV every 3-4 wks for 12 mths

Outcome measured at:
13 mths

Pathological # (N,V,C):
(N) A 135/524; B 145/561; C 148/555

(V) A 84/524; B 109/561; C 108/555

(C) A 179/524; B 200/561; C 203/555

Radiotherapy:
A 112/524; B 85/561; C 112/555

SCC:
A 12/524; B 11/561; C 16/555

Ortho procedure:
A 15/524; B 21/561; C 31/555

Hypercalcaemia:
A 5/524; B 7/561; C 12/555

Time to 1st SRE [median]:
A 11.54; B 12.26; C 11.70 mths, NS

Performance status

QUAL

Bone pain and analgesic use

A
             
             
Unpublished data C (w49)

Saad 2002 (w50)

Randomised controlled trial

Double blind

643 patients

Prostate cancer

A – Zoledronate 8/4mg IV in 50-100mls Nsaline over 5-15 mins every 3 wks for 15 mths

B - Zoledronate 4mg IV in 50-100 mls Nsaline over 5-15 mins every 3 wks for 15 mths

C – Placebo 

Outcome measured at:
15 mths

Pathological # (N,V,C):
(N) A 22/221; B 22/214; C 33/208

(V) A 17/221; B 8/214; C 17/208

(C) A 33/221; B 28/214; C 46/208

Radiotherapy:

A 53/221; B 49/214; C 61/208

SCC:
A 11/221; B 9/214; C 14/208

Ortho procedure:
A 6/221; B 5/214; C 7/208

Hypercalcaemia:
A 0/221; B 0/214; C 2/208

Time to 1st SRE [median]:
A 11.93; B Not reached; C 10.55 mths

Performance status

QUAL

Bone pain and analgesic use

A
             

 

Table B Excluded studies (posted as supplied by author)
 
Study Reason for exclusion
Abdulkadyrov 1993 (w51) Russian paper. On translation, did not fulfil criteria for a randomised controlled trial
Abildgaard 1998 (w52) Histomorphometric study of a subset of patients from Brinker et al(w8)
Adami 1989 (w53) Pain study; did not measure any of the primary outcome measures of this review
Arican 1999 (w54) Pain study; did not measure any of the primary outcome measures of this review
Attardo-Parrinello 1987 (w55) Not a randomised controlled trial
Ausgabe 1997 (w56) German paper. This review mentions recruitment for a RCT of hormone resistant prostate cancer, patients randomised to one of three arms: epirubicin, clodronate, or epirubicin + clodronate. Study centre contacted for update on progress. No reply received. 
Body 1999 (w57) [meeting abstract] Outcomes measured as events/year. Further data not available from authors.
Cascinu 1998 (w58) Pain study; did not measure any of the primary outcome measures of this review
Coleman 1997 (w59) Pain study; did not measure any of the primary outcome measures of this review
Coleman 1998 (w60) Pain study; did not measure any of the primary outcome measures of this review
Coleman 1999 (w61) Study measuring bone resorption markers. No measurement of any of the primary outcome measures of this review
Conte 1991 (w62) Study measuring bone resorption markers. No measurement of any of the primary outcome measures of this review
Costa 1993 (w63) Portuguese paper. On translation, did not fulfil criteria for a randomised controlled trial
Dearnaley 2001 (w64) Meeting Abstract. Did not report any of the primary outcome measures of this review
Diel 1999 (w65) Meeting Abstract. Pain and quality of life study; did not measure any of the primary outcome measure of this review
Elomaa 1992 (w66) Pain study; did not measure any of the primary outcome measures of this review
Elomaa 1996 (w67) Bone resorption marker study; did not measure any of the primary outcome measures of this review
Ernst 1992 (w68) Pain study; did not measure any of the primary outcome measures of this review
Ernst 1997 (w69) Pain study; did not measure any of the primary outcome measures of this review
Fernandez-Conde 1997 (w70) Histomorphometric study; did not measure any of the primary outcome measures of this review
Gessner 2000 (w71) Economic study; costs of terminal care for patients with osteolytic bone disease treated with pamidronate
Jung 1983 (w72) Calcium kinetics study; did not measure any of the primary outcome measures of this review
Koeberle 1999 (w73) Pain study; did not measure any of the primary outcome measures of this review
Kylmala 1993 (w74) Pain study; did not measure any of the primary outcome measures of this review
Kylmala 1997 (w73) Pain study; did not measure any of the primary outcome measures of this review
Lipton 1994 (w76) Pain study; did not measure any of the primary outcome measures of this review
Lipton 1996 (w77) Not a randomised controlled trial
Lipton 1998 (w78) Not a randomised controlled trial
Merlini 1990 (w79) Not a randomised controlled trial
Moiseyenko 1998 (w80) Russian paper. On translation, pain study, no measurement of any of the primary outcome measures of this review
O’Rourke 1995 (w81) Pain study; did not measure any of the primary outcome measures of this review
Peest 1996 (w82) Primary outcome, measurement of bone resorption markers. Did not measure any of the primary outcome measures of this review
Piga 1998 (w83) Pain study; did not measure any of the primary outcome measures of this review
Poliakov 1999 (w84) Russian paper. On translation, not a RCT, pain study, no measurement of any of the primary outcome measures of this review
Rinenberg 1987 (w85) Maintenance of normocalcaemia study; included mixed haematological malignancies
Schiller 1987 (w86) Maintenance of normocalcaemia study
Slaby 1997 (w87) Czech paper. Measured bone resorption markers
Smith 1989 (w88) Pain study; did not measure any of the primary outcome measures of this review
Strang 1997 (w89) Pain study; did not measure any of the primary outcome measures of this review
Taube 1993 (w90) Histomorphometric study; did not measure any of the primary outcome measure of this review
Taube 1994 (w91) Histomorphometric study; did not measure any of the primary outcome measures of this review
Terpos 2000 (w92) Pain study; did not measure any of the primary outcome measures of this review
Thurlimann 1994 (w93) Not a randomised controlled trial
Vinholes 1996 (w94) Not a randomised controlled trial
Vinholes 1997 (w95) Pain study; did not measure any of the primary outcome measures of this review
Vinholes 1999 (w96) Measured bone resorption markers; did not measure any of the primary outcome measures of this review
Zhang 1997 (w97) Chinese paper. On translation, pain study, no measurement of any of the primary outcome measures of this review
Zhang 1999 (w98) Chinese paper. On translation, pain study, no measurement of any of the primary outcome measures of this review

References for tables of included and excluded studies

w1 Ausili-Cefaro G, Capirci C, Crivellari D, Fontana V, Mandoliti G, Olmi P, et al. Radiation therapy vs radiation therapy + pamidronate (Aredia) in elderly patients with breast cancer and lytic bone metastases: A GROG-GIOGER randomized clinical trial. Rays 1999;24(suppl 2):49-52.

w2 Belch AR, Bergsagel DE, Wilson K, O’Reilly S, Wilson J, Sutton D, et al. Effect of daily etidronate on the osteolysis of multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 1991;9:1397-402.

w3 Berenson JR, Lichtenstein A, Porter L, Dimopoulos MA, Bordoni R, George S, et al. Efficacy of pamidronate in reducing skeletal events in patients with advanced multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 1996;334(8):488-93.

w4 Berenson JR, Lichtenstein A, Porter L, Dimopoulos MA, Bordoni R, George S, et al. Long-term pamidronate treatment of advanced multiple myeloma patients reduces skeletal events. J Clin Oncol 1998;16(2):593-602.

w5 Berenson JR. The efficacy of pamidronate disodium in the treatment of osteolytic lesions and bone pain in multiple myeloma. Rev Contemp Pharmacother 1998;9:195-203.

w6 Berenson JR, Rosen LS, Howell A, Porter L, Coleman RE, Morley W, et al. Zoledronic acid reduces skeletal-related events in patients with osteolytic metastases. Cancer 2001;91:1191-200.

w7 Berenson JR. Zoledronic acid in cancer patients with bone metastases: results of phase I and II trials. Semin Oncol 2001;28(suppl 6):25-34.

w8 Brincker H, Westin J, Abildgaard N, Gimsing P, Turesson I, Hedenus M, et al. Failure of oral pamidronate to reduce skeletal morbidity in multiple myeloma: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Danish-Swedish co-operative study group. Br J Haematol 1998;101:280-6.

w9 Conte PF, Giannessi PG, Latreille J, Mauriac L, Koliren L, Calabresi F, et al. Delayed progression of bone metastases with pamidronate therapy in breast cancer patients: a randomized, multicenter phase III trial. Ann Oncol 1994;5(suppl 7):S41-4.

w10 Conte PF, Latreille J, Mauriac L, Calabresi F, Santos R, Campos D, et al. Delay in progression of bone metastases in breast cancer patients treated with intravenous pamidronate: results from a multinational randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:2552-9.

w11 Ford JF. Pamidronate in the treatment of bone metastases--the European experience. Br J Clin Pract Suppl 1996;87:3-4.

w12 Daragon A, Humez C, Michot C, Le Loet X, Grosbois B, Pouyol F, et al. Treatment of mutiple myeloma with etidronate: results of a multicentre double-blind study. Eur J Med 1993;2:449-52.

w13 Delmas P, Charhon S, Chapuy MC, Vignon E, Briancon D, Edouard C, et al. Long-term effects of dichloromethylene diphosphonate (CL2MDP) on skeletal lesions in multiple myeloma. Metab Bone Dis Rel Res 1982;4:163-8.

w14 Diel IJ, Marschner N, Kindler M, Lange O, Untch M, Hurtz HJ, et al. Continuous oral versus intravenous interval therapy with bisphosphonates in patients with breast cancer and bone metastases. J Clin Oncol (ASCO) abstract 488. 1999.

w15 Elomaa I, Blomqvist C, Grohn P, Porkka L, Kairento AL, Selander K, et al. Long-term controlled trial with diphosphonate in patients with osteolytic bone metastases. Lancet 1983;1:146-9.

w16 Elomaa I, Blomqvist C, Porkka L, Lamberg-Allardt C, Borgstrom GH. Treatment of skeletal disease in breast cancer: a controlled clodronate trial. Bone 1987;8(suppl 1):S53-6.

w17 Elomaa I, Blomqvist C, Porkka L, Holmstrom T, Taube T, Lamberg-Allardt C, et al. Clodronate for osteolytic metastases due to breast cancer. Biomed Pharmacother 1988;42:111-6.

w18 Glover D, Lipton A, Keller A, Miller AA, Browning S, Fram RJ, et al. Intravenous pamidronate disodium treatment of bone metastases in patients with breast cancer. Cancer 1994;74:2949-55.

w19 Gomez-Pastrana E, Velasco JG, Requena A, Martinez-Salazar FJ, Martinez ME, Calero F. Clinical and biochemical valuation of clodronate in tumoral osteolysis by bone metastases of breast cancer. Progresos de Obstetricia y Gynecologia 1996;39:357-64.

w20 Harris AL, Millward M, Tomkin K, Cantwell BM, Carmichael J, Wilson R, et al. Randomised trial of aminoglutethamide and hydrocortisone with and without disodium pamidronate (APD) in patients with advanced postmenopausal breast cancer and bone metastases. In: Bijvoet OL, Lipton A, eds. Osteoclast inhibition in the management of malignancy-related bone disorders. Seattle, WA: Hogrefe and Huber, 1993:A73.

w21 Heim ME, Clemens MR, Queirber W, Pecherstorfer M, Boewer C, Herold M, et al. Prospective randomised trial of dichloromethylene bisphosphonate (clodronate) in patients with multiple myeloma requiring treatment. A multicenter study. Onkologie 1995;18:439-48.

w22 Clemens MR, Fessele K, Heim ME. Multiple myeloma: effect of daily dichloromethylene bisphosphonate on skeletal complications. Ann Hematol 1993;66:141-6.

w23 Holten-Verzantvoort AT, Kroon HM, Bijvoet OL, Cleton FJ, Beex LV, Blijham G, et al. Palliative pamidronate treatment in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1993;11:491-8.

w24 Holten-Verzantvoort AT, Bijvoet OL, Cleton FJ, Hermans J, Kroon HM, Harinck HI, et al. Reduced morbidity from skeletal metastases in breast cancer patients during long-term bisphosphonate (APD) treatment. Lancet 1987;2:983-5.

w25 Cleton FJ, Holten-Verzantvoort AT, Bijvoet OL. Effect of long-term bisphosphonate treatment on morbidity due to bone metastases in breast cancer patients. Rec Res Cancer Res 1989;116:73-8.

w26 Holten-Verzantvoort AT, Zwinderman AH, Aaronson NK, Hermans J, Emmerik B, Dam FS, et al. The effect of supportive pamidronate treatment on aspects of quality of life of patients with advanced breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 1991;27:544-9.

w27 Hortobagyi GN, Theriault RL, Lipton A, Porter L, Blayney D, Sinoff C, et al. Long-term prevention of skeletal complications of metastatic breast cancer with pamidronate. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:2038-44.

w28 Hortobagyi GN, Theriault RL, Porter L, Blayney D, Lipton A, Sinoff C, et al. Efficacy of pamidronate in reducing skeletal complications in patients with breast cancer and lytic bone metastases. N Engl J Med 1996;335:1785-91.

w29 Hultborn R, Gundersen S, Ryden S, Holmberg E, Carstensen J, Wallgren UB, et al. Efficacy of pamidronate in breast cancer with bone metastases: a randomized double-blind placebo controlled multicenter study. Acta Oncol 1996;35(suppl 5):73-4.

w30 Hultborn R, Gundersen S, Ryden S, Holmberg E, Carstensen J, Wallgren UB, et al. Efficacy of pamidronate in breast cancer with bone metastases: a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled multicenter study. Anticancer Res 1999;19:3383-92.

w31 Kraj M, Poglod R, Pawlikowski J, Maj S, Nasilowska B. Effect of pamidronate on skeletal morbidity in myelomatosis part 1. The results of the first 12 months of pamidronate therapy. Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica 2000;57(suppl):113-6.

w32 Kraj M, Poglod R, Pawlikowski J, Maj S. The effect of long-term pamidronate treatment on skeletal morbidity in advanced multiple myeloma. Acta Haematologica Polonica 2000;31:379-89.

w33 Kristensen B, Ejlertsen B, Groenvold M, Hein S, Loft H, Mouridsen HT. Oral clodronate in breast cancer patients with bone metastases: a randomized study. J Intern Med 1999;246:67-74.

w34 Lahtinen R, Laakso M, Palva I, Virkkunen P, Elomaa I. Randomised, placebo-controlled multicentre trial of clodronate in multiple myeloma. Lancet 1992;340:1049-52.

w35 Laakso M, Lahtinen R, Virkkunen P, Elomaa I. Subgroup and cost-benefit analysis of the Finnish multicentre trial of clodronate in multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 1994;87:725-9.

w36 Lipton A, Theriault R, Hortobagyi GN, Simeone J, Knight RD, Mellars K, et al. Pamidronate prevents skeletal complications and is effective palliative treatment in women with breast carcinoma and osteolytic bone metastases. Cancer 2000;88:1082-90.

w37 Theriault R. Pamidronate in the treatment of osteolytic bone metastases in breast cancer patients. Br J Clin Pract Suppl 1996;87:8-12.

w38 Martoni A, Guaraldi M, Camera P, Biagi R, Marri S, Beghe F, et al. Controlled clinical study on the use of dichloromethylene diphosphonate in patients with breast carcinoma metastasizing to the skeleton. Oncology 1991;48:97-101.

w39 McCloskey EV, MacLennan IC, Drayson MT, Chapman C, Dunn J, Kanis JA. A randomized trial of the effect of clodronate on skeletal morbidity in multiple myeloma. MRC Working Party on Leukaemia in Adults. Br J Haematol 1998;100:317-25.

w40 Paterson AH, Powles TJ, Kanis JA, McCloskey E, Hanson J, Ashley S. Double-blind controlled trial of oral clodronate in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1993;11:59-65.

w41 Robertson AG, Reed NS, Ralston SH. Effect of oral clodronate on metastatic bone pain: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Oncol 1995;13:2427-30.

w42 Theriault RL, Lipton A, Hortobagyi GN, Leff R, Gluck S, Stewart JF, et al. Pamidronate reduces skeletal morbidity in women with advanced breast cancer and lytic bone lesions: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:846-54.

w43 Tubiana-Hulin M, Beuzeboc P, Mauriac L, Barbet N, Frenay M, Monnier A, et al. Double-blinded controlled study comparing clodronate versus placebo in patients with breast cancer bone metastases. Bull Cancer 2001;88:701-7.

w44 Hulin MT, Beuzeboc P, Mauriac L, Clavel M, Barbet N, Frenay M, et al. Double blind placebo controlled trial of oral clodronate in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer. Ann Oncol 1994;5(suppl 8):198.

w45 Unpublished data A. From R Murphy, Novartis pharmaceuticals to JR Ross and Y Saunders, 2001.

w46 Rosen LS. Efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone metastases associated with lung cancer and other solid tumours. Semin Oncol 2002;29(suppl 21):28-32.

w47 Unpublished data B. From R Murphy, Novartis pharmaceuticals to JR Ross and Y Saunders, 2001.

w48 Rosen LS, Gordon D, Kaminski M, Howell A, Belch A, Mackey JA, et al. Zoledronic acid versus pamidronate in the treatment of skeletal metastases in patients with breast cancer or osteolytic lesions of multiple myeloma: a phase III , double-blind, comparative trial. Cancer 2001;7:377-87.

w49 Unpublished data C. From R Murphy, Novartis pharmaceuticals to JR Ross and Y Saunders, 2001.

w50 Saad F, Gleason DM, Murray R, Tchekmedyian S, Venner P, Lacombe L, et al. A randomized placebo controlled trial of zoledronic acid in patients with hormone refractory metastatic prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:1458-68.

w51 Abdulkadyrov KM, Bessmelisev SS. Bonefos efficacy in combined treatment of multiple myeloma. Terapeuticheskii Arkhiv 1993;65:70-2.

w52 Abildgaard N, Rungby J, Glerup H, Brixen K, Kassem M, Brincker H, et al. Long-term oral pamidronate treatment inhibits osteoclastic bone resorption and bone turnover without affecting osteoblastic function in multiple myeloma. Eur J Haematol 1998;61:128-34.

w53 Adami S, Mian M. Clodronate therapy and metastatic bone disease in patients with prostatic carcinoma. Rec Res Cancer Res 1989;116:s67-72.

w54 Arican A, Icli F, Akbulut H, Cakir M, Sencan O, Samur M, et al. The effect of two different doses of oral clodronate on pain in patients with bone metastases. Med Oncol 1999;16:204-10.

w55 Attardo-Parrinello G, Merlini G, Pavesi F, Crema F, Fiorentini ML, Ascari E. Effects of a new aminodiphosphonate (aminohydroxybutylidene diphosphonate) in patients with osteolytic lesions from metastases and myelomatosis. Comparison with dichloromethylene diphosphonate. Arch Intern Med 1987;147:1629-33.

w56 Ausgabe A. Behandlung des hormonrefraktären Prostatakarzinomsmit schmerzhaften Knochenmetastasen. Der Urologe 1997;36:568.

w57 Body JJ, Lichinitser MR, Diehl I, Schlosser K, Pfarr E, Cavalli F, et al. Double-blind placebo-controlled trial of intravenous ibandronate in breast cancer metastatic to bone. Proc Ann Meet Am Soc Clin Oncol 1999;18:A2222.

w58 Cascinu S, Graziano F, Alessandroni P, Ligi M, Del Ferro E, Rossi D, et al. Different doses of pamidronate in patients with painful osteolytic bone metastases. Support Care Cancer 1998;6:139-43.

w59 Coleman RE, Purohit OP, Vinholes J, Zekri J. High dose pamidronate: clinical and biochemical effects in metastatic bone disease. Cancer 1997;80:1686-90.

w60 Coleman RE, Houston SJ, Purohit OP, Rubens RD, Kandra A, Ford J. A randomised phase II study of oral pamidronate for the treatment of bone metastases from breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 1998;34:820-4.

w61 Coleman RE, Purohit OP, Black C, Vinholes JJ, Schlosser K, Huss H, et al. Double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study of oral ibandronate in patients with metastatic bone disease. Ann Oncol 1999;10:311-6.

w62 Conte N, Di Virgilio R, Da Rin G, Roiter I, Pavan P, Legovini P, et al. Clodronate treatment increases serum osteocalcin in normocalcemic osteolytic bone metastases. Oncology 1991;48:54-7.

w63 Costa L, Moreira C, Da Costa EB. Pamidronato dissódico (APD) no tatamento das metástases ósseas. [Disodium pamidronate (APD) in the treatment of bone metastases]. Acta Médica Portuguesa 1993;6:71-3.

w64 Dearnaley DP, Sydes MR. Preliminary evidence that oral clodronate delays symptomatic progression of bone metastases from prostate cancer: first results of the MRC Pr05 trial. J Clin Oncol (ASCO) 2001;Abs 693.

w65 Diel IJ, Lichinitser MR, Body JJ, Schlosser K, Moecks J, Cavalli F, et al. Improvement of bone pain, quality of life and survival time of breast cncer patients with metastatic bone disease treated with intravenous ibandronate. Eur J Cancer 1999;35(suppl 4):S83.

w66 Elomaa I, Kylmala T, Tammela T, Viitanen J, Ottelin J, Ruutu M, et al. Effect of oral clodronate on bone pain. A controlled study in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Int Urol Nephrol 1992;24:159-66.

w67 Elomaa I, Risteli L, Laakso M, Lahtinen R, Virkkunen P, Risteli J. Monitoring the action of clodronate with type I collagen metabolites in multiple myeloma. Eur J Cancer 1996;32A:1166-70.

w68 Ernst DS, MacDonald N, Paterson AHG, Jensen J, Brasher P, Bruera E. A double-blind, crossover trial of intravenous clodronate in metastatic bone pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 1992;7:4-11.

w69 Ernst DS, Brasher P, Hagen N, Paterson AHG, MacDonald N, Bruera E. A randomised controlled trial of intravenous clodronate in patients with metastatic bone disease and pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 1997;13:319-26.

w70 Fernandez-Conde M, Alcover J, Aaron JE, Ordi J, Carretero P. Skeletal response to clodronate in prostate cancer with bone metastases. Am J Clin Oncol 1997;20:471-6.

w71 Gessner U, Koeberle D, Thuerlimann B, Bacchus L, Horisberger B. Economic analysis of terminal care for patients with malignant osteolytic bone disease and pain treated with pamidronate. Support Care Cancer 2000;8:115-22.

w72 Jung A, Chantraine A, Donath A, van Ouwenaller C, Turnill D, Mermillod B, et al. Use of dichloromethylene diphosphonate in metastatic bone disease. N Engl J Med 1983;308:1499-501.

w73 Koeberle D, Bacchus L, Thurlimann B, Senn HJ. Pamidronate treatment in patients with malignant osteolytic bone disease and pain: a prospective randomised double-blind trial. Support Care Cancer 1999;7:21-7.

w74 Kylmala T, Tammela T, Risteli L, Risteli J, Taube T, Elomaa I. Evaluation of the effect of oral clodronate on skeletal metastases with type 1 collagen metabolites. A controlled trial of the Finnish Prostate Cancer Group. Eur J Cancer 1993;29A:821-5.

w75 Kylmala T, Taube T, Tammela T, Risteli L, Risteli J, Elomaa I. Concomitant IV and oral clodronate in the relief of bone pain - A double blind placebo controlled study in patients with prostate cancer. Br J Cancer 1997;76:939-42.

w76 Lipton A, Glover D, Harvey H, Grabelsky S, Zelenakas K, Macerata R, et al. Pamidronate in the treatment of bone metastases: results of 2 dose-ranging trials in patients with breast or prostate cancer. Ann Oncol 1994;5(suppl 7):s31-5.

w77 Lipton A. Zolendronate in the treatment of osteolytic bone metastases. Br J Clin Pract Suppl 1996;87:21.

w78 Lipton A, Demers L, Curley E, Chinchilli V, Gaydos L, Hortobagyi G, et al. Markers of bone resorption in patients treated with pamidronate. Eur J Cancer 1998;34:2021-6.

w79 Merlini G, Parrinello GA, Piccinini L, Crema F, Fiorentini ML, Riccardi A, et al. Long-term effects of parenteral dichloromethylene bisphosphonate (CL2MBP) on bone disease of myeloma patients treated with chemotherapy. Hematol Oncol 1990;8:23-30.

w80 Moiseyenko VM, Blinov NN, Semiglazov VV, Konstantinova MM, Trishkina EA. Randomised trial of two intravenous schedules of bonefos (clodronate) in patients with painful bone metastases. Voprosy Onkologii 1998;44:725-8.

w81 O’Rourke N, McCloskey E, Houghton F, Huss H, Kanis JA. Double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response trial of oral clodronate in patients with bone metastases. J Clin Oncol y 1995;13:929-34.

w82 Peest D, Deicher H, Fett W, Harms P, Braun HJ, Planker M, et al. Pyridinium cross-links in multiple myeloma: correlation with clinical parameters and use for monitoring of intravenous clodronate therapy - a pilot study of the German myeloma treatment group (GMTG). Eur J Cancer 1996;32A:2053-7.

w83 Piga A, Bracci R, Ferretti B, Sandri P, Nortilli R, Acito L, et al. A double blind randomised study of oral clodronate in the treatment of bone metastases from tumours poorly responsive to chemotherapy. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 1998;17:213-7.

w84 Poliakov PI, Larionova NA, Bychenkov OA, Moskin VG. An experience with combined therapy of radiation and Bonephos for osteolytic metastases of breast cancer. Voprosy Onkologii 1999;45:311-3.

w85 Ringenberg QS, Ritch PS. Efficacy of oral administration of etidronate disodium in maintaining normal serum calcium levels in previously hypercalcemic cancer patients. Clin Ther 1987;9:318-25.

w86 Schiller JH, Rasmussen P, Benson AB, III, Witte RS, Bockman RS, Harvey HA, et al. Maintenance etidronate in the prevention of malignancy-associated hypercalcemia. Arch Intern Med 1987;147:963-6.

w87 Slaby J, Spicka I, Hulejová H, Spacek P, Cieslar P, Klener P. Effect of clodronate in patients with multiple myeloma. Cas Lék ces 1997;136:57-60.

w88 Smith JA. Palliation of painful bone metastases from prostate cancer using sodium etidronate: results of a randomised, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Urol 1989;141:85-7.

w89 Strang P, Nilsson S, Brandstedt S, Sehlin J, Borghede G, Varenhorst E, et al. The analgesic effect of clodronate compared with placebo in patients with painful bone metastases from prostatic cancer. Anticancer Res 1997;17:4717-22.

w90 Taube T, Elomaa I, Blomqvist C, Beneton MN, Kanis JA. Comparative effects of clodronate and calcitonin on bone in metastatic breast cancer: a histomorphometric study. Eur J Cancer 1993;29A:1677-81.

w91 Taube T, Kylmala T, Lamberg-Allardt C, Tammela T, Elomaa I. The effect of clodronate on bone in metastatic prostate cancer. Histomorphometric report of a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled study. Eur J Cancer 1994;30A:751-8.

w92 Terpos E, Palermos J, Tsionos K, Anargyrou K, Viniou N, Papassavas P, et al. Effect of pamidronate administration on markers of bone turnover and disease activity in multiple myeloma. Eur J Haematol 2000;65:331-6.

w93 Thurlimann B, Morant R, Jungi WF, Radziwill AJ. Pamidronate for pain control in patients with malignant osteolytic bone disease: a prospective dose effect study. Support Care Cancer 1994;2:61-5.

w94 Vinholes J, Guo CY, Purohit OP, Eastell R, Coleman RE. Metabolic effects of pamidronate in patients with metastatic bone disease. Br J Cancer 1996;73:1089-95.

w95 Vinholes JJ, Purohit OP, Abbey ME, Eastell R, Coleman RE. Relationships between biochemical and symptomatic response in a double-blind randomised trial of pamidronate for metastatic bone disease. Ann Oncol 1997;8:1243-50.

w96 Vinholes J, Coleman R, Lacombe D, Rose C, Tubiana-Hulin M, Bastit P, et al. Assessment of bone response to systemic therapy in an EORTC trial: preliminary experience with the use of collagen cross-link excretion. Br J Cancer 1999;80:221-8.

w97 Zhang L, Guan Z, He Y. Randomised comparative clinical trial of treatment of bone metastatic diseases by infusion of palidronate and clodronate. Chinese J Cancer 1997;16:430-2.

w98 Zhang J, Chu Y, Xie S. Treatment of metastatic bone pain with Bonin either alone or combined with chemotherapy. Chinese J Clin Oncol 1999;26:762-4.