Schiedlmeier et al. 10.1073/pnas.0703082104. |
Fig. 5. Experimental design to identify HOXB4 target genes in adult HSCs/HPCs. Mouse HSCs/HPCs were transduced with a retroviral vector coexpressing EGFP and a TMX-inducible form of HOXB4 (HOXB4ER). Transduced cell populations were expanded for 14 days in the presence of TMX. After expansion, flow cytometrically purified HOXB4-ER+LSK cells were cultivated either with or without TMX for 1 and 4 h. RNA was prepared after the indicated time points, and gene expression profiles were analyzed by using Affymetrix oligoneculeotide arrays (Mouse Genome 430-2.0). Expression profiling was also performed with LSK cells expressing constitutively active HOXB4 (HOXB4const) ± TMX, to exclude putative changes in gene expression caused by unknown effects of TMX itself.
Fig. 6. qRT-PCR confirms changes in gene expression observed in microarray profiling of adult HSCs/HPCs. Gene expression changes were measured in triplicate analysis of RNA samples from purified HOXB4ER+LSK cells that had been incubated with and without TMX for 4 h to induce HOXB4 in the presence or absence of CHX. Relative differences in gene expression between TMX-induced and noninduced HOXB4ER samples were calculated by using the 2-DDCT method by normalizing the CT values for each gene to the CT values of the housekeeping gene, actin. Values are shown as fold induction (mean ± SD) in the absence (green bars) and presence of CHX (red bars). ** indicates direct gene targets of HOXB4, displaying differential gene expression in the presence of CHX.
Fig. 7. Real-time PCR studies validate overlapping HOXB4 target genes in day-6 EBs. Gene expression changes were measured in triplicate analysis of RNA samples from EBs induced with Dox from day 4 to day 6. Expression of mouse actin was used as the endogenous control. Relative gene expression was calculated by the comparative 2-DDCT method. Values are shown as fold induction (mean ± SD). # indicates gene loci, displaying differential gene expression upon HOXB4 induction.
Fig. 8. Real-time PCR confirms gene expression changes in ES-HCs. RNA samples from HOXB4-ER expressing ES-HCs induced with TMX for 4 h in the presence or absence of CHX were analyzed in triplicate. Expression of mouse actin was used as the endogenous control. Relative gene expression was calculated by the comparative 2-DDCT method. Values are shown as fold induction in the absence (green bars) and presence of CHX (red bars). ** indicates direct gene targets of HOXB4, displaying differential gene expression in the presence of CHX.
Fig. 9. Increased frequency of LSK cells in HOXB4-induced BM cells after culture in the presence of TNF-a. The progeny (expansion equivalent) of 2,000 HOXB4ER- and 2,000 control vector (tCD34)-transduced LSK cells were mixed and cocultured for 7 days, as indicated, in serum-free cytokine-supplemented medium in the presence or absence of TNF-a± HOXB4-induction with TMX, after which they were stained against lineage markers, Sca-1, c-kit, human CD34, and DAPI. Numbers indicate the percentage of gated cells in the indicated regions.
Fig. 10. Inhibition of FGF signaling enhances HOXB4-mediated expansion of ES-HC-derived primitive progenitors. HOXB4 expressing ES-HCs were cultured with or without either FGF2 (bFGF) or the FGF signaling inhibitor SU5402 for 14 days and colony assays were performed in triplicate. Columns represent the number of colonies per 1,000 seeded cells. Results are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3); P values were determined by Student´s t test. Colony types were: BFU-E, burst forming unit erythroid; GM, granulocytic-monocytic; G, granulocytic; M, monocytic; GEMM, granulocytic-erythroid-monocytic-megakaryocytic.
Fig. 11. Chemical blockage of FGF signaling increases the expansion of HOXB4-ER expressing HSCs. The progeny (expansion equivalent) of 2,000 HOXB4ER-transduced (■]) and 2,000 control vector tCD34-transduced (∆) LSK cells were mixed and cocultured, as indicated, in serum-free cytokine-supplemented medium. HOXB4 activity was induced with TMX in the presence or absence of the FGF receptor inhibitor, SU5402 or TNF-a. After 7 days, the cell mixtures were transplanted into cohorts of lethally irradiated recipient mice. Small horizontal lines indicate the mean percentage of HOXB4ER+ or tCD34+ cells in the peripheral blood 16 weeks after transplantation.
Fig. 12. Blockage of MEK1/2 activity abolishes the synergistic HOXB4/SU5402 effect on expansion of early progenitors. Inducible HOXB4 ES cells were treated from day 4 to 6 of EB formation with Dox in the absence or presence of either the FGF receptor inhibitor SU5402 and/or the MEK1/2 inhibitor U0126 as indicated. EBs were collected on day 6 and processed for methylcellulose-CFU assays. While inhibition of FGF signaling enhanced HOXB4-mediated expansion of early HPCs, concomitant inhibition of the MEK1/2 kinases interfered with this effect. Ery, definitve erythroid; GM, granulocyte macrophage; GEMM, granulocyte, erythroid, macrophage, megakaryocyte multilineage; Results are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3); P values were determined by Student´s t test.
SI Text
Retroviral Constructs
For generation of a tamoxifen-inducible HOXB4 protein C-terminally fused with the estrogen receptor (ER) ligand-binding domain, PCR-based modifications of the HoxB4 cDNA were performed by using FMEV-GFP2AHAHHOXB4wPRE as a template (1). In a first step, the GFP2AHAHHOXB4 expression cassette was amplified by using the oligodeoxynucleotides A (5'-GACCGTGTGCGGCCGCATGGTGAGCAAGGGCGAG-GAGCTGTTCA-3') and B (5'-TCTCATGTCTCCAGCAGATGGATCGAGCGC-GCGGGGGCCTCCATT-3') as primers. We thereby deleted the stop codon at the 3' end of the HOXB4 cDNA and fused it with the first 24 bp of the ER-ligand binding domain. The ER-ligand binding domain was amplified by using pERT2 (2) as a template and the oligodeoxynucleotides C (5'AATGGAGGCCCCCGCGCGCTCGATCCATCTG-CTGG-AGACATGAGA-3') and D (5'-ACGTTGTAAAACGACGGCCAGTGAA-3') as primers. The last 21 nt of 3'HOXB4 cDNA were added directly 5' in front of the start codon of the ER-ligand binding domain. After purification, the two amplification products were used for an "overlap PCR" serving as templates to amplify the complete GFP2AHAHOXB4ER fusion cDNA using the oligodeoxynucleotides A and D as primers. From the plasmid FMEV-GFP2AHAHHOXB4wPRE the GFP2AHAHHOXB4 cassette was finally excised with NotI and EcoRI and exchanged with the GFP2AHAHOXB4ER amplicon. Retroviral vectors, SF91-EGFP2AHAHOXB4-wPRE, expressing constitutively active HOXB4 (HOXconst) and SF11-tCD34, expressing a truncated form of human CD34 (tCD34) have been described (3, 4). Preparation of ecotropic-pseudotyped retroviral particles have been described (1).
Flow Cytometry and Cell Sorting
For sorting of LSK subpopulations, freshly prepared BM cells or in vitro-cultivated progenitor cells were stained with PerCPCy5.5-labeled anti-ScaI, APC-labeled anti-c-kit, and a mixture of phycoerythrin (PE)-labeled mAbs directed against lineage markers (CD11b, Gr1, Ter119, CD3, CD4, CD8, B220), including anti-IL-7R. Alternatively, the cells were incubated with PE-conjugated anti-ScaI, allophycocyanin (APC)-conjugated anti-c-kit, and a biotin-conjugated mixture of lineage mAbs followed by staining with steptavidin-PerCPCy5.5. Cell aggregates were excluded with forward-scatter area versus pulse width. DAPI was used for exclusion of dead cells. Gates were set according to control samples stained according to the method called Fluorescence Minus One (FMO). FACSAria, LSRII, and FACS-Calibur instruments (Becton Dickinson) were used for cell sorting and analysis. Flow cytometry data were analyzed with FlowJo software (Tree Star). All antibodies were purchased either from BD Pharmigen or eBiocience (San Diego, CA).
Retroviral Transduction of HSCs/HPCs
Lin-ScaI+ and sorted LSK cells were plated at density of 1 ´ 105 cells/ml in serum-free medium (StemSpan, Stem Cell Technologies) containing rmSCF (50 ng/ml), rhFL (50 ng/ml), rhIL-11 (50 ng/ml), rmIL-3 (20 ng/ml), and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Recombinant cytokines were obtained from Peprotech (Rocky Hill, NJ). After prestimulation for 36-40 h, cells were transduced by using plates preleoaded with RetroNectin (TaKaRa, Otsu, Japan) and retroviral vector particles at an multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10. After two rounds of transduction on 2 consecutive days, cells were harvested, washed in PBS (PBS, Gibco) and resupended in the cytokine-supplemented serum-free medium described above. Proportions of transduced cells (GFP+ or tCD34+) were determined by flow cytometry.
Ex Vivo
Expansion of HOXB4-Transduced HSCs/HPCsFor microarray studies, HOXB4ER- and HOXB4const- transduced Lin-ScaI+ cells were expanded for 14 days in cytokine-supplemented (mSCF, huFL, huIL-11, mIL-3), serum-free medium (StemSpan) in the presence of 10 nM TMX (Sigma). Subesquently, HOXB4ER+ and HOXB4constLSK cells, respectively, were purified by FACS and further cultivated for 12 h in cytokine-supplemented serum-free medium in the presence of 10 nM TMX. Thereafter, both cell populations were split into two fractions and further incubated either with or without TMX. After 1 and 4 h of TMX withdrawal, the cells were lysed in Trizol (Invitrogen) and RNA was purified by using the RNeasy Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).
To analyze the repopulation ability of ex vivo expanded HOXB4-expressing cells, the progenies of HOXB4ER-transduced and tCD34 control vector transduced LSK cells were mixed in a 1:1 ratio after transduction, reflecting the expansion equivalents (EEs) of equal numbers of freshly isolated LSK cells. The cell mixes were then cultivated in serum-free medium ± 10 nM TMX without and with addition of either TNF-a (R&D, Wiesbaden, Germany) or 10% FCS (Stem Cell Technologies, Vancouver, Canada), respectively. TMX was added to the HOXB4ER/tCD34 cell samples 6 h before addition of the aforementioned substances to be tested. After 7 days of cocultivation, cohorts of mice were transplanted with suitable aliquots of the differently cultivated HOXB4ER/tCD34 cell mixes. Each mouse received in total the EEs of 4,000 freshly isolated LSK cells, half transduced with the HOXB4ER vector, the other transduced with the tCD34 vector. Donor cells were cotransplanted with freshly isolated 200,000 unfractioned CD45.2 competitor BM cells for radioprotection. Mice were bled from the tail vein and peripheral blood (PB) was analyzed 11 and 28 weeks after transplantation for multilineage reconstitution with HOXB4ER+(GFP+) and tCD34+ donor cells. PB samples were lysed with ammonium chloride before staining with antibodies against human CD34 and antibodies against anti-mouse CD3, CD11b, Gr-1, CD19, and Ter119.
Mice and Transplantation
Mice were purchased from Charles River and kept in microisolators in the pathogen-free animal facility of the Hannover Medical School. C57BL/6J (CD45.2) mice were used as transplant donors and recipients. Before transplantation (<24 h), female CD45.2 recipient mice of ³12 weeks of age were conditioned by lethal irradiation with a single exposure to a total body dose of 10 Gy. Irradiated mice received ciprofloxacin at 100 mg/ml in drinking water for the first 2 weeks. Irradiated recipients were transplanted i.v. (0.3 ml/mouse) by tail-vein injection. All animal experiments were approved by the local ethical committee and performed according to their guidelines.
ES Cells and HOXB4 Induction
The Hoxb4i ES cell line was cultured in DMEM supplemented with 0.1 mM nonessential amino cids, 2 mM glutamine, 15% FCS, 0.1 mM b-mercaptoethanol, and 103 units/ml of leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF). EBs were made by trypsinizing ES cells and incubating them in IMDM supplemented with 15% FCS, 200 mg/ml transferrin, 4.5 mM monothioglycerol, 50 mg/ml ascorbic acid, and 2 mM glutamine at a concentration of 3,500 cells/ml in bacteriological plates. HOXB4i ES cells were treated from days 4-6 of EB formation with and without doxycycline (2 mg/ml) in the absence or presence of bFGF (50 ng/ml) or the Fgfr inhibitor SU5402 (Calbiochem) (30 mM) and/or the MEK1/2 inhibitor U0126 (Calbiochem) (30 mM). In experiments including these drugs, control cultures contained the corresponding amount of DMSO (the solvent for SU5402). In all cases EBs were collected on day 6 after their initial plating and were processed for methylcellulose-CFU assays or RNA extraction.
Generation of ES-HCs
The CCE ES-cell line retrovirally expressing HOXB4 (5) was grown on gelatinized plates without feeder cells in DMEM (Gibco/BRL, Carlsbad, CA), supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine (Gibco/BRL), 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 mg/ml streptomycin (Gibco/BRL), 15% (vol/vol) FCS (FCS, Euroclone, Milano, Italy), 1% (vol/vol) LIF-supernatant, and 1.5 ´ 10-4 M monothioglycerol (MTG; Sigma, St. Louis, MO).
Three days before differentiation in vitro, ES cells were transferred to IMDM (Gibco/BRL) supplemented with the same components as DMEM. For EB differentiation, ES cells were plated on a nontreated Petri dish at a concentration of 1,000 cells/ml in EB differentiation medium containing IMDM (Gibco/BRL), 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 mg/ml streptomycin, 15% (vol/vol) FCS, 50% (wt/vol) methylcellulose (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), 50 mg/ml ascorbic acid (Sigma), 300 mg/ml iron-saturated human transferrin (Sigma), 5% (vol/vol) protein-free hybridoma medium (PFHM-II; Gibco/BRL), and 4 ´ 10-4 M MTG. EB differentiation medium was replaced at day 5 of EB differentiation. For dissociation, day-6 EBs were incubated at 37°C in 1x trypsin for 3-5 min, FCS was added, and EBs were dissociated by repeated pipetting.
Dissociated EB cells were seeded into SCM, a serum-free medium (StemPro34 plus nutrient supplement; Life Technologies, Gibco/BRL) supplemented with 100 ng/ml murine SCF (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), 10-6 M dexamethasone (Sigma), 40 ng/ml IGF-1 (Promega, Madison, WI), 2 ng/ml mIL-3, 5 ng/ml IL-6, and 10 ng/ml mflt-3L. At day 1 of cultivation, cells growing in suspension were removed from adherent cells and plated onto a new Petri dish. Cell number and cell size was determined by using an electronic cell counter (CASY-TTC; Schärfe-System, Reutlingen, Germany). Cell density was maintained between 2 and 4 ´ 106 cells/ml.
For FGF-signaling studies, HOXB4-ER expressing ES-HCs (day 21 after EB dissociation) were grown for 2 weeks in SCM containing either recombinant human FGF2 (rh-FGF2, basic FGF) at a concentration of 50 ng/ml + Heparin (Liquemin N5000; Hoffmann LaRoche, Grenzach-Wyhlen; f.c. 1:1,000) or the FGF-signaling inhibitor SU5402 (Calbiochem) at final concentration of 10 mM. Cells were counted every day, pelleted, and resuspended in fresh SCM +/-FGF2 or SU5402 at a concentration of 2 ´ 106/ml.
Hematopoietic colony assays were performed in M3434 complete MethoCult Media (StemCell Technologies) according to the manufacturer's protocol.
Retroviral Transduction of ES-HCs, HOXB4 Induction, and qRT-PCR
ES-HCs were transduced 7 days after dissociation of EBs (ES-HC, d7) with the ecotropic HOXB4ER retroviral expression vector by two rounds of spin inoculation on two consecutive days, as described (1). A multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10 was used. GFP-expressing cells were flowcytometrically sorted 48 h later and grown in SCM containing 100 nM TMX (Sigma).
For HOXB4 target gene expression analysis, HOXB4-ER ES-HCs were washed twice and cultured over night without TMX. The next day, the cells were counted, their viability was determined (CASY-TTC; Schärfe System, Reutlingen, Germany), split into equal fractions, and incubated with (or without) cycloheximid (f.c. 5 mg/ml) to block protein synthesis for 30 min. Subsequently, the cells were incubated ± 100 nM TMX to activate the HOXB4-ER fusion. Samples containing 106 cells each were withdrawn at 0, 2, and 4 h after induction of HOXB4 and lysed in Trizol (Invitrogen) and total RNA was purified by using the RNeasy Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Fifty nanograms of each RNA was used for cDNA synthesis and amplication with the QuantiTect Whole Transcriptome Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer´s protocol. Amplified cDNA was column purified via the QIAmp DNA Mini kit (Qiagen).
For analysis of HOXB4 target gene expression in ES-HCs, real-time PCRs were performed in triplicate with 50 ng amplified cDNA per reaction using the QuantiFast SYBR Green PCR System in combination with QuantiTect Primers (Qiagen). Amplification was carried out in 96-well PCR plates (Applied Biosystems), in a 7300 Real-Time-PCR machine (Applied Biosystems). Expression of mouse actin was used as the endogenous control. Relative gene expression was calculated by the comparative 2-DDCT method.
qRT-PCR
FACS-sorted LSK cells as indicated were initially lysed in Trizol (Invitrogen). After recovery of the aqueous phase, RNA was purified by using the RNEasy Mini Elute Kit (Qiagen). Ten to 50 ng of each RNA was used for cDNA synthesis and amplified once by using the WT-Ovation RNA Amplification System (Nugen, San Carlos, CA) or the QuantiTect Whole Transcriptome Kit (Qiagen), according to the manufacturer´s protocol.
Real-time PCRs were performed in triplicate with 20 or 50 ng amplified cDNA per reaction in at total volume of 25 ml using either TaqMan Gene Expression Assays-on-Demand (Applied Biosystem) in combination with the Universal PCR Master Mix, NoAmpErase UNG (Applied Biosystems) or using QuantiTect Primers (Qiagen) in combination with QuantiFastSYBR Green PCR Master mix on a 7300 Real-Time-PCR System (Applied Biosystems) in 96-well PCR plates (Applied Biosystems). For normalization, expression of mouse actin was determined in parallel in triplicate as an endogenous control (Applied Biosystems). Relative gene expression was calculated by using the 2-DDCT method.
Semiquantitative RT-PCR
Total RNA (3 mg) from EB cells was reverse-transcribed with SuperScript II (Invitrogen) reverse transcriptase by using random hexamers (2.5 mg/ml) at 42°C. The RNA template was then removed with RnaseH and one-15th of the reaction was then used for a PCR by using the following primer pairs: Sef1, 5'-AGAACACGGGCCTGTGAC-3' and 5'-AGAGGAAGACCTTGGGCTG-3'; Sprouty2, 5'-GAGCCGGATCCAAGAGATGCC-3' and 5'-TTCCATCAGCAGCAGCAGGCC-3'; Mkp3, 5'-GCAGCGTGCTCGGCCTATGCC-3' and 5'-GAGCCGTCTAGATTGGTCTCG-3', Gapdh, 5'-ACCACAGTCCATGCCATCAC-3' and 5'-TCCACCACCCTGTTGCTGTA-3'. The cycling conditions were 95°C for 45 s, 65°C for 45 s, 72°C for 45 s, for a total of 25 cycles.
RNA Isolation, Target Synthesis, and Hybridization to Affymetrix GeneChips
Total RNA was extracted from EBs by using RNAzol. Concentration and purity was determined by spectrophotometry and integrity was confirmed by using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer with a RNA 6000 Nano Assay (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA). RNA was processed for use on Affymetrix (Santa Clara, CA) GeneChip Mouse Genome 430 2.0 arrays. EB-derived RNA samples were processed according to the manufacturer's One-Cycle Target Labeling Assay. Briefly, 4.3 mg of total RNA containing spiked in Poly(A) RNA controls [GeneChip Expression GeneChip Eukaryotic Poly(A) RNA Control Kit; Affymetrix] was used in a reverse transcription reaction (One-Cycle DNA synthesis kit; Affymetrix) to generate first-strand cDNA. After second-strand synthesis, double-stranded cDNA was used in an in vitro transcription (IVT) reaction to generate biotinylated cRNA (GeneChip Expression 3'-Amplification Reagents for IVT-Labeling; Affymetrix). Size distribution of the cRNA and fragmented cRNA, respectively, was assessed by using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer with a RNA 6000 Nano Assay. Fifteen micrograms of fragmented cRNA was used in a 300-ml hybridization containing added hybridization controls. Two-hundred microliters of mixture was hybridized on arrays for 16 h at 45°C. Standard posthybridization wash and double-stain protocols (EukGE-WS2v5) were used on an Affymetrix GeneChip Fluidics Station 400. Arrays were scanned on an Affymetrix GeneChip scanner 3000.
For experiments with adult HSC/HPCs, LSK cells were lysed in Trizol and RNA was purified by using the RNeasy Kit (Qiagen). RNA integrity was determined by using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. Subsequent quantitative analysis of chromatograms for the extent of degradation products was performed by Degradometer software (4). cRNA was synthesized according to the CodeLink Expression Bioarray System (Amersham Pharmacia Biosciences, Pittsburgh, PA) small-sample target-labeling protocol. Briefly, 0.7-1 mg of total RNA per sample was used to prepare a biotin-labeled cRNA target by linear amplification. cDNA synthesis was done by using an oligo-dT primer that contains a T7 polymerase recognition sequence. This was followed by in vitro transcription to generate cRNA, followed by recovery of the biotin-labeled product in accordance with protocols recommended by CodeLink system manual target preparation. All hybridizations were carried out by using 15 mg of labeled cRNA in a 300-ml hybridization containing added hybridization controls. Two hundred microliters of mixture was hybridized on arrays for 16 h at 45°C. Standard posthybridization wash and double-stain protocols (EukGE-WS2v4) were used on an Affymetrix GeneChip Fluidics Station 450. Arrays were scanned on an Affymetrix GeneChip scanner 3000 (Affymetrix) for gene expression profiling as set forth by the manufacturer's recommendations. All quality parameters for the arrays were confirmed to be in the recommended range.
GeneChip Data Analysis
For experiments with differentiated ES cells, scanned arrays were analyzed first with Affymetrix MAS 5.0 software to obtain absent/present calls and for subsequent analysis with dChip 1.3 (www.dchip.org; Wong Lab, Harvard) using a PM (perfect match)-only model. The arrays were normalized to a baseline array with median CEL intensity by applying an invariant set normalization method. Replicate data for the same sample type were weighted genewise by using inverse squared standard error as weights. Only genes called present in at least one of the three independent array experiments and within replicate arrays called present within a variation of 0 < median (SD/mean) < 0.5 were kept for downstream analysis (27,203 probe sets). All genes compared were considered to be differentially expressed if the 90% lower confidence bound of the fold change between experiment and baseline was > 1.4. For experiments with adult HSC/HPCs, scanned images (DAT files) were converted into CEL files using GCOS software (Affymetrix). log2 expression estimates were calculated by RMAExpress (http:rmaexpress.bmbolstad.com) using the RMA algorithm. Probe sets are reported as differentially expressed if at least one set of experiments showed absolute log2 difference >1 between HOXB4ER+LSK minus tamoxifen treatment and control cells (HOXB4ER+LSK plus tamoxifen treatment). Differentially expressed genes were analyzed for overrepresented biological themes (GO categories) using EASE software.
Primers for qRT-PCR
The following genes and primers were used:
TaqMan Gene Expression Assays-on-Demand | |
Bambi | Mm 00810458_s1 |
Bre | Mm 01217729_m1 |
Btg3 | Mm 01963789_u1 |
CyclinM2 | Mm 00473856_g1 |
Dll1 | Mm 01279265_g1 |
Klf3 | Mm 00627090_m1 |
Mad | Mm 00487504_m1 |
Socs6 | Mm 01972179_s1 |
Spry1 | Mm 00839969_q1 |
Trim27 | Mm 01136028_m1 |
QuantiTect Primers | |
Acvr2b | Mm_Acvr2b_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00109039 |
Akt1 | Mm_Akt1_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00114401 |
Arl4 | Mm_Arl4a_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT01048439 |
Bcl2l11 | Mm_Bcl2l11_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00132979 |
Bmpr1a | Mm_Bmpr1a_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT01057511 |
Bmp7 | Mm_Bmp7_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00096026 |
Btg2 | Mm_Btg2_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00153216 |
Catnb | Mm_Catnb_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00160958 |
Ccng2 | Mm_Ccng2_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00093604 |
Ccni | Mm_Ccni_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00154007 |
Cdc42 | Mm_Cdc42_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00091560 |
Cdh5 | Mm_Cdh5_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00110467 |
Cdkn1a | Mm_Cdkn1a_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00137053 |
Cdkn1b | Mm_Cdkn1b_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT01058708 |
Cebpb | Mm_Cebpb_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00320313 |
c-myc | Mm_Myc_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00096194 |
Ddit3 | Mm_Ddit3_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT01077769 |
Ddx3x | Mm_Ddx3x_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00166572 |
Dll3 | Mm_Dll3_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00113477 |
Dusp6 | Mm_Dusp6_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00101997 |
Eif4a1 | Mm_Eif4a1_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00167090 |
Etv5 | Mm_Etv5_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00142443 |
Fbxo9 | Mm_Fbxo9_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00107324 |
Fgf8 | Mm_Fgf8_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00108773 |
Fgf15 | Mm_Fgf15_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00102137 |
Fgfr1 | Mm_Fgfr1_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay;QT00198548 |
Foxo3a | Mm_Foxo3_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00168623 |
Gadd45a | Mm_Gadd45a_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00249655 |
Hbp1 | Mm_Hbp1_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00132636 |
Herpud1 | Mm_Herpud1_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00116095 |
Il17rd (Sef1) | Mm_Il17rd_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00143423 |
Jmjd1a | Mm_Jmjd1a_2_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT01168314 |
Mcm3 | Mm_Mcm3_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00113190 |
Mgea5 | Mm_Mgea5_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00129948 |
Mib1 | Mm_Mib1_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00110453 |
Narf | Mm_4430402O11Rik_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00163884 |
Pten | Mm_Pten_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00141568 |
Ptgs2 | Mm_Ptgs2_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00165347 |
Ptp4a2 | Mm_Ptp4a2_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00143332 |
Rasa2 | Mm_Rasa2_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00129122 |
Senp2 | Mm_Senp2_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00164696 |
Sh3kpb1 | Mm_Sh3kbp1_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00163772 |
Shmt1 | Mm_Shmt1_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00175098 |
Smad3 | Mm_Smad3a_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00109004 |
Socs2 | Mm_Socs2_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00248269 |
Spry2 | Mm_Spry2_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00133952 |
Tde1 | Mm_Tde1_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00140700 |
Tgfbr1 | Mm_Tgfbr1_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00135828 |
Tle1 | Mm_Tle1_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00172991 |
Tle3 | Mm_Tle3_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00117901 |
Tnfrsf1b | Mm_Tnfrsf1b_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT01077636 |
Tnip | Mm_Tnip1_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00149009 |
Twsg1 | Mm_Twsg1_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00109067 |
Ywhag | Mm_Ywhag_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00288575 |
Zfp260 | Mm_Zfp260_2_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT01039920 |
Zfyve21 | Mm_Zfyve21_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT01074962 |
Zfx | Mm_Zfx_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay; QT00095263 |
1. Schiedlmeier B, Klump H, Will E, Arman-Kalcek G, Li Z, Wang Z, Rimek A., Friel J, Baum C, Ostertag W, et al. (2003) Blood 101:1759-1768.
2. Feil R, Wagner J, Metzger D, Chambon P (1997) Biochem Biophys Res Commun 237:752-757.
3. Fehse B, Richters A, Putimtseva-Scharf K, Klump H, Li Z, Ostertag W, Zander AR, Baum C (2000) Mol Ther 1:448-456.
4. Auer H, Lyianarachchi S, Newsom D, Klisovic MI, Marcucci G, Kornacker K (2003) Nat Genet 35:292-293.
5. Pilat S, Carotta S, Schiedlmeier B, Kamino K, Mairhofer A, Will E, Modlich U, Steinlein P, Ostertag W, Baum C, et al. (2005) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:12101-106.