TABLE S3. The Mutations at the DCS Locus Marginally Affect the Inactivation Parameters

Ba2+
Ca2+
Mutants channel
VinkinRinVinkinRin
mVmV%mVmV%
CaV2.3 WT [14]
-22 ± 18.5 ± 0.353 ± 4-11 ± 18.9 ± 0.556 ± 3
CaV2.3(DSED) [7]
-22 ± 28.5 ± 0.860 ± 3-14 ± 17.2 ± 0.5a55 ± 6
CaV2.3(TSQN) [22]
-21 ± 18.8 ± 0.458 ± 3-20 ± 1a9.6 ± 0.562 ± 6
CaV2.3(DEEE) [11]
-20 ± 18.7 ± 0.956 ± 3-14 ± 18.2 ± 1.059 ± 3

CaV2.3(DEQN) [11]

-16 ± 3a9.4 ± 0.859 ± 4-12 ± 59.4 ± 1.562 ± 7
CaV2.3(GGGG) [5]
-25 ± 110.2 ± 0.6a47 ± 4-15 ± 510.7 ± 1.147 ± 3
CaV2.3(AAAA) [5]
-28 ± 2a9.3 ± 0.638 ± 3a-20 ± 1a10.4 ± 1.149 ± 4
CaV2.1 WT [13]
-11 ± 15.7 ± 0.458 ± 2-4 ± 13.9 ± 0.564 ± 4
CaV2.1(TEQE) [8]
-7 ± 27.9 ± 0.634 ± 3a-7 ± 36.2 ± 1.945 ± 7

Isochronal steady-state inactivation curves (2.5 s of conditioning voltage followed by a 400-ms test pulse to +10 mV) were fitted using the following equation: I/Imax = Rin + (1 - Rin)/(1 + exp((V - Vin)/k)), where I is the current amplitude measured during the test pulse at +10 mV for conditioning voltages varying from -80 to +50 mV, Imax is the current amplitude measured during the test pulse for a conditioning voltage to -80 mV, Vin is the potential for half inactivation, V is the voltage, kin is the slope factor, and Rin is the proportion of noninactivating current.

aStudentÕs t test has been used to compare each mutant value with the control CaV2.3, and differences were considered statistically significant when P < 0.05.