Additional references

1. Tuffs A. German scientists withdraw research paper on cancer vaccine. BMJ 2003;327:637.
2. Pincock S. Science forced to retract article on "ecstasy." BMJ 2003;327:579-a.
3. Gottlieb S. Ecstasy produces parkinsonian effects in monkeys. BMJ 2002;325:736c.
4. Blakemore C. Quoted in: Anonymous. ‘Killer’ ecstasy claim was false http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3089350.stm (accessed 29 Sep 2003).
5. Godlee F, Jefferson T, eds. Peer review in health sciences. 2d ed. London: BMJ Books, 2003.
6. Smith R. Peer review: reform or revolution? BMJ 1997;315:759-60.
7. Godlee F, Gale CR, Martyn CN. Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1998;280:237-40.
8. Schroter S, Black N, Evans S, Carpenter C, Godlee F, Smith R. Effects of training on the quality of peer review: A randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2003 (in press).
9. Enstrom JE, Kabat GC. Environmental tobacco smoke and tobacco related mortality in a prospective study of Californians, 1960-98. BMJ 2003;326:1057-60.
10. Vaidya JS. Passive smoking: Study was flawed from outset. BMJ 2003;327:501.
11. Alevizaki M, Legon S. Retraction in the light of new data. BMJ 1989;299:235.

Alevizaki M, Stevenson JC, Girgis SI, MacIntyre I, Legon S. Altered calcitonin gene in a young patient with osteoporosis. BMJ 1989;298:1215-6.