Supplementary material for Ash et al. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97 (19), 10371-10376.

Table 4.

Derivation of protein chemical shift models

 

Model

Ösapay & Case (6)

Herranz et al. (7)

Williamson & Asakura(8)

No. of proteins, CH fit

17

3

8

No. of C-H protons fit

5,678

265

768

No. of a protons fit

1,553

265

768

Glycine protons

Excluded

Include better of 2

If 2, average; else discard

b

Protons

Averaged

None

None

Other protons

All but pH depend

None

None

Ring-current model

Haigh & Mallion (13)

Johnson & Bovey (14)

Johson & Bovey (14)

Ring intensity factors

5 (empirical)

2 (literature values)

5 (empirical)

Electric field term

Yes*

No

Yes*

R

value for C-H

0.88

0.79

Typ. 0.85

SE

± 0.23

± 0.29

Typ. ± 0.27

No. of proteins, NH fit

17

3

15

No. of N-H protons fit

1,627

239

1,509

Ring-current model

Haigh & Mallion (13)

Johnson & Bovey (14)

Haigh & Mallion (13)

Electric field term

Yes

No

No

R

value for N-H

0.58

0.76

0.67§

SE

± 0.62

± 0.45

± 0.54§

*Electric field term makes a modest, but systematic improvement in fit.

Asakura et al. (9).

Slightly different coefficients for N- H, AOCN = 30.5, CCO = -9.54, using our convention.

§

Slightly different coefficients for N- H, ACO = -11, BCO = -5, ACN = -7, and BCN =1, using our convention.