Supplementary material for Ash et al. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97 (19), 10371-10376.
Table 4.
Derivation of protein chemical shift models
| Model | ||
Ösapay & Case (6) | Herranz et al. (7) | Williamson & Asakura(8) | |
No. of proteins, CH fit | 17 | 3 | 8 |
No. of C-H protons fit | 5,678 | 265 | 768 |
No. of a protons fit | 1,553 | 265 | 768 |
Glycine protons | Excluded | Include better of 2 | If 2, average; else discard |
b Protons | Averaged | None | None |
Other protons | All but pH depend | None | None |
Ring-current model | Haigh & Mallion (13) | Johnson & Bovey (14) | Johson & Bovey (14) |
Ring intensity factors | 5 (empirical) | 2 (literature values) | 5 (empirical) |
Electric field term | Yes* | No | Yes* |
R value for C-H | 0.88 | 0.79 | Typ. 0.85 |
SE | ± 0.23 | ± 0.29 | Typ. ± 0.27 |
No. of proteins, NH fit | 17 | 3 | 15 |
No. of N-H protons fit | 1,627 | 239 | 1,509 |
Ring-current model | Haigh & Mallion (13) | Johnson & Bovey (14) | Haigh & Mallion (13) |
Electric field term | Yes | No | No |
R value for N-H | 0.58 | 0.76 | 0.67§ |
SE | ± 0.62 | ± 0.45 | ± 0.54§ |
*Electric field term makes a modest, but systematic improvement in fit.
Asakura et al. (9).
Slightly different coefficients for N- H, AOCN = 30.5, CCO = -9.54, using our convention.§
Slightly different coefficients for N- H, ACO = -11, BCO = -5, ACN = -7, and BCN =1, using our convention.