Table A Placebo controlled trials of topical azoles for fungal skin infections of foot

Table B Placebo controlled trials of allylamines and other topical treatments for fungal skin infections of foot

Table C Comparative trials of two active topical treatments for fungal infections of skin or nails of foot

Table D Comparative trials of more than two active topical treatments for fungal skin infections of foot
 

Table A Placebo controlled trials of topical azoles for fungal skin infections of foot
 

Trial

Interventions
Sample size
Treatment (weeks)
Follow up (weeks)
% Cure rate (No cured)
% Difference in risk (95% CI)
Relative risk (95% CI)
Bagatell (1986)w1Bifonazole
26
4
6
73 (19)
25 (-3 to 51)
0.65 (0.37 to 1.04)
Placebo
21
4
6
48 (10)
Coffey (1986)w12Bifonazole
16
4
6
100 (16)
71 (45 to 88)
0.29 (0.12 to 0.57)
Placebo
14
4
6
29 (4)
Izuno (1986)w13Bifonazole
20
4
6
90 (18)
23 (-3 to 49)
0.74 (0.48 to 1.04)
Placebo
18
4
6
67 (12)
Smith (1986)w14Bifonazole
23
4
6
91 (21)
69 (45 to 83)
0.25 (0.12 to 0.45)
Placebo
31
4
6
23 (7)
Speikerman I (1976)w120Clotrimazole
133
6
6
78 (104)
32 (21 to 42)
0.59 (0.48 to 0.72)
Placebo
134
6
6
46 (62)
Speikerman II (1976)w120Clotrimazole
17
6
6
88 (15)
59 (30 to 78)
0.33 (0.17 to 0.59)
Placebo
24
6
6
29 (7)
Smith (1977)w121Clotrimazole
33
6
6
67 (22)
27 (3 to 48)
0.59 (0.35 to 0.94)
Placebo
33
6
6
39 (13)
Daily (1985)w15Econazole
32
4
8
97 (31)
14 (-3 to 42)
0.86 (0.57 to 1.04)
Placebo
12
4
8
83 (10)
Ison (1990)w16Econazole
19
4
8
100 (19)
54 (29 to 77)
0.46 (0.25 to 0.83)
Placebo
13
4
8
46 (6)
Mandy (1974)w19Miconazole
6
4
8
100 (6)
0 (-41 to 41)
1.00 (0.57 to 1.74)
Placebo
6
4
8
100 (6)
Duncan (1975)w17Miconazole
49
4
8
90 (44)
51 (34 to 64)
0.44 (0.30 to 0.60)
Placebo
56
4
8
39 (22)
Gentles (1975)w18Miconazole
10
4
8
70 (7)
3 (-49 to 40)
0.95 (0.40 to 1.89)
Placebo
6
4
8
67 (4)
Ortiz (1978)w20Miconazole
50
4
8
94 (47)
76 (61 to 86)
0.19 (0.10 to 0.33)
Placebo
50
4
8
18 (9)
Akers (1989)w122Sulconazole
62
4
6
82 (51)
48 (28 to 65)
0.42 (0.25 to 0.64)
Placebo
32
4
6
34 (11)
Smith (1988)w124Tioconazole
14
6
10
86 (12)
-14 (-41 to 33)
1.50 (0.71 to 1.93)
Placebo
5
6
10
100 (5)

 

Table B Placebo controlled trials of allylamines and other topical treatments for fungal skin infections of foot
 

Trial

Interventions
Sample size
Treatment (weeks)
Follow up (weeks)
% Cure rate (No cured)
% Difference in risk (95% CI)
Relative risk (95% CI)
Allylamines
Savin (1997)w22Butenafine
132
1
6
74 (98)
52 (41 to 61)
0.30 (0.22 to 0.41)
Placebo
139
1
6
22 (31)
Tschen (1997)w23Butenafine
40
4
8
88 (35)
55 (35 to 70)
0.37 (0.23 to 0.56)
Placebo
40
4
8
33 (13)
Klaschka (1984)w4Naftifine
29
4
6
100 (29)
96* (81 to 99)
0.02* (0.00 to 0.17)
Placebo
24
4
6
0 (0)
Dobson (1989)w3Naftifine
95
4
6
66 (63)
48 (35 to 60)
0.27 (0.17 to 0.43)
Placebo
88
4
6
18 (16)
Schachner (1990)w5Naftifine
47
4
6
62 (29)
32 (12 to 50)
0.48 (0.28 to 0.77)
Placebo
44
4
6
29 (13)
Bagatell I (1991)w1Naftifine
42
4
6
50 (21)
35 (16 to 52)
0.30 (0.14 to 0.62)
Placebo
46
4
6
15 (7)
Bagatell II (1991)w1Naftifine
117
4
6
73 (85)
56 (44 to 66)
0.24 (0.15 to 0.35)
Placebo
111
4
 

17 (19)

Savin (1990)w8Terbinafine
9
4
6
67 (6)
63* (35 to 88)
0.06* (0.01 to 0.47)
Placebo
13
4
6
0 (0)
Smith (1990)w10Terbinafine
9
4
6
78 (7)
73* (38 to 94)
0.07* (0.01 to 0.52)
Placebo
9
4
6
0 (0)
Evans (1991)w7Terbinafine
27
2
6
81 (22)
36 (9 to 60)
0.55 (0.31 to 0.87)
Placebo
20
2
6
45 (9)
Berman (1992)w6Terbinafine
80
1
6
88 (70)
65 (51 to 75)
0.26 (0.17 to 0.38)
Placebo
79
1
6
23 (18)
Savin (1994)w9Terbinafine
97
2
8
69 (67)
54 (42 to 65)
0.21 (0.13 to 0.34)
Placebo
96
2
8
14 (13)
Other
Kligman I (1985)w2Ciclopiroxolamine
71
4
6
56 (40)
48 (35 to 61)
0.14 (0.06 to 0.31)
Placebo
73
4
6
8 (6)
Aly (1994)w123Griseofulvin
47
4
6
81 (38)
46 (29 to 64)
0.42 (0.27 to 0.64)
Placebo
47
4
6
34 (16)
Gomez (1986)w21Tolciclate
11
6
8
82 (9)
15 (-29 to 67)
0.81 (0.25 to 1.50)
Placebo
3
6
8
67 (2)
Chretien (1980)w24Undecenoic acid and zinc undeceonate
23
4
6
87 (20)
64 (37 to 81)
0.26 (0.12 to 0.52)
Placebo
22
4
6
23 (5)

*When observed number of cures or failures is zero, both difference in risk and relative risk estimated by replacing zero with 0.5, a form of "continuity correction."w117
 
 

Table C Comparative trials of two active topical treatments for fungal infections of skin or nails of foot
 

Trial

Interventions
Sample size
Treatment (weeks)
Follow up (weeks)
% Cure rate (No cured)
% Difference in risk (95% CI)
Relative risk (95%CI)
Comparison of allylamines v azoles in fungal infections of skin
Del Palacio (1989)w29Amorolfine
6
6
3
100 (6)
0 (-41 to 59)
1.00 (0.38 to 1.66)
Bifonazole
3
6
3
100 (3)
Bojanovsky (1985w27Naftifine
49
5
5
84 (41)
-6 (-20 to 7)
1.08 (0.72 to 1.29)
Bifonazole
50
5
5
91 (45)
Haas (1985)w38Naftifine
99
4
4
88 (87)
8 (-2 to 18)
0.91 (0.80 to 1.03)
Clotrimazole
105
4
4
81 (84)
Kagawa (1985)w39Naftifine
78
5
5
72 (56)
30 (15 to 44)
0.58 (0.47 to 0.71)
Clotrimazole
77
5
5
42 (32)
Plotkin (1990)w40Naftifine
30
4
6
40 (12)
3 (-22 to 27)
0.93 (0.48 to 1.77)
Clotrimazole
27
4
6
37 (10)
Smith (1992)w36Naftifine
72
4
8
74 (53)
29 (13 to 43)
0.61 (0.45 to 0.80)
Clotrimazole
74
4
8
45 (33)
Evans (1993a)w37Naftifine
33
4
12
94 (31)
7 (-9 to 27)
0.93 (0.72 to 1.11)
Clotrimazole + hydrocortisone
23
4
12
87 (20)
Sanchez (1994)w32Terbinafine
16
4
4
19 (3)
-37 (-6 to –60)
2.96 (1.17 to 8.78)
Bifonazole
27
4
4
56 (15)
Evans (1993b)w31Terbinafine
107
1
6
97 (104)
14 (6 to 22)
0.86 (0.77 to 0.93)
Clotrimazole
104
4
6
84 (87)
Vermeer (1996)w33Terbinafine
102
1
6
95 (97)
-2 (-8 to 5)
1.02 (0.95 to 1.09)
Miconazole
89
4
6
97 (86)
Comparison between two azoles in fungal infections of skin
Qadripur (1979)w34Econazole
30
4
4
67 (20)
30 (5 to 54)
0.55 (0.32 to 0.93)
Clotrimazole
30
4
4
37 (11)
Fredriksson (1982)w25Bifonazole
10
3
5
70 (7)
50 (5 to 78)
0.29 (0.08 to 0.87)
Econazole
10
3
5
20 (2)
Privat (1982)w26Bifonazole
20
3
5
75 (15)
5 (-23 to 33)
0.93 (0.63 to 1.37)
Econazole
20
3
5
70 (14)
Tanenbaum (1982)w42Sulconazole
6
4
10
100 (6)
0 (-41 to 46)
1.00 (0.52 to 1.72)
Miconazole
5
4
10
100 (5)
Roberts (1985)w47Bifonazole
15
3
6
73 (11)
10 (-22 to 43)
0.85 (0.52 to 1.30)
Miconazole
16
3
6
63 (10)
Thomas (1986)w28Bifonazole
15
3
3
87 (13)
20 (-15 to 55)
0.76 (0.46 to 1.20)
Sulconazole
9
3
3
67 (6)
Woscoff (1986)w43Sulconazole
21
3
5
95 (20)
25 (3 to 47)
0.73 (0.53 to 0.99)
Miconazole
20
3
5
70 (14)
Greer (1987)w46Ketoconazole
30
4
8
77 (23)
3 (-18 to 25)
0.95 (0.71 to 1.20)
Ketoconazole
30
4
8
73 (22)
Smith II (1988)w124Tioconazole
34
6
10
94 (32)
10 (-5 to 26)
0.88 (0.73 to 1.06)
Miconazole
30
6
10
83 (25)
Smith III (1988)w124Tioconazole
16
6
10
81 (13)
6 (-25 to 37)
0.92 (0.61 to 1.38)
Miconazole
12
6
10
75 (9)
Kuhlwein (1990)w35Croconazole
19
3
5
100 (19)
0 (-17 to 19)
1.0 (0.79 to 1.23)
Bifonazole
17
3
5
100 (17)
Friederich (1992)w48Bifonazole:

continuous treatment

38
3
6
97 (37)
 

8 (-3 to 20)

 

0.91 (0.79 to 1.04)

Bifonazole: intermittent treatment
35
3
6
89 (31)
Tsuboi (1996)w45Neticonazole and dressing
44
4
4
52 (23)
-23 (-3 to -41)
1.43 (1.06 to 2.03)
Neticonazole
52
4
4
75 (39)
Other agents in fungal infections of skin
Kligman II (1985)w2Ciclopiroxolamine
33
4
6
88 (29)
9 (-8 to 26)
0.89 (0.72 to 1.10)
Clotrimazole
37
4
6
78 (29)
 

 

Carter (1972)w30

Haloprogen
52
4
5
79 (41)
38 (11 to 60)
0.52 (0.27 to 0.84)
Tolnaftate
17
4
5
41 (7)
Thomas (1976)w44Clotrimazole
14
4
8
86 (12)
36 (-4 to 69)
0.58 (0.25 to 1.04)
Tolnaftate
8
4
8
50 (4)
Holti (1970)w41Variotin
4
8
24
75 (3)
8 (-48 to 65)
0.75 (0.32 to 1.74)
Whitfield's ointment
6
8
24
67 (4)
Fungal infections of nails
Mensing (1992)w108Amorolfine 5% in ethanol
17
4
6
94 (16)
12 (-13 to 37)
0.88 (0.62 to 1.17)
Amorolfine 5% in methylene chloride
17
4
6
82 (14)
Buck (1994)w107Clotrimazole
53
26
26
8 (4)
-3 (-15 to 8)
1.45 (0.48 to 4.46)
Tea tree oil
64
26
26
11 (7)

 

Table D Comparative trials of more than two active topical treatments for fungal skin infections of foot
 

TrialInterventions
Sample size
Treatment (weeks)
Follow up (weeks)
% Cure rate (No cured)
Comparison between allylamines and azoles
Smith (1990)w50Naftifine twice daily
36
4
6
81 (29)
Naftifine once daily
65
4
6
66 (43)
Clotrimazole twice daily
55
4
6
58 (32)
Bergstresser (1993)w53Terbinafine
42
4
12
86 (36)
Terbinafine
38
1
12
76 (29)
Clotrimazole
43
4
12
70 (30)
Clotrimazole
37
1
12
35 (13)
Ablon (1996)w49Naftifine
29
2
10
75 (22)
Terbinafine
31
2
10
81 (25)
Oxiconazole
28
2
10
27 (8)
Comparison between two or more azoles
Ellis (1989)w59Oxiconazole nitrate and hydrocortisone
54
4
6
80 (43)
Oxiconazole nitrate
56
4
6
75 (42)
Placebo
44
4
6
34 (15)
Elewski (1996)w55Oxiconazole nitrate and fluticasone propionate
103
4
6
82 (84)
Oxiconazole nitrate
98
4
6
65 (64)
Placebo
96
4
6
31 (30)
Korting (1997)w51Econazole gel
159
2
4
79 (34)
Econazole cream
154
2
4
73 (42)
Clotrimazole
152
2
4
70 (45)
Comparison between two or more allylamines
Zaug et al 1992w52Amorolfine 0.5%
111
4
6
88 (98)
Amorolfine 0.25%
103
4
6
86 (89)
Amorolfine 0.125%
123
4
6
87 (107)
Evans (1994)w54Terbinafine
12
7 days
12
92 (11)
Terbinafine
17
5 days
12
88 (15)
Terbinafine
18
3 days
12
67 (12)
Terbinafine
18
1 day
12
94 (17)
Other agents
Smith (1977)w60Zinc undecenoate
27
6
6
59 (16)
Old undecenoate
30
6
6
47 (14)
Placebo
23
6
6
4 (1)
No treatment
22
6
6
9 (2)
Tschen (1979)w57Undecenoic acid
27
4
8
81 (22)
Tolnaftate
21
4
8
67 (14)
Placebo
12
4
8
67 (8)
Fuerst (1980)w56Undecenoic acid
16
4
6
69 (11)
Tolnaftate
24
4
6
67 (16)
Placebo
24
4
6
25 (6)
Tong (1992)w58Tolnaftate
33
4
5
85 (28)
Tea tree oil
37
4
5
30 (11)
Placebo
34
4
5
21 (7)