UNC-4 antagonizes Wnt signaling to regulate synaptic choice in the C. elegans motor circuit

DEV075184 Supplementary Material

Files in this Data Supplement:

  • Supplemental Table S1 -

    Table S1. List of alleles used in this study.

  • Supplemental Table S2 -

    Table S2. Primer sequences for verification of mutations in genetic crosses.

  • Supplemental Table S3 -

    Table S3. List of transgenes used in this study together with primer sequences used to synthesize the plasmids.

  • Supplemental Table S4 -

    Table S4. Microarray results detect Wnt receptors that are expressed in A-class motor neurons and negatively regulated by the UNC-4 pathway. Microarray experiments were performed with transcripts isolated from embryonic DA motor neurons and from larval VA motor neurons. Transcripts enriched in wild-type DA (lin-17=1.7×) or VA motor neurons (mig-1=1.6×) were identified by comparison to corresponding reference profiles of all cells. ‘EG’ (expressed gene) denotes transcripts that are detected but not enriched (Fox et al., 2005; Von Stetina et al., 2007a). promoter::GFP reporter genes for mom-5, mig-1 and lin-17 were detected in VA motor neurons (Fox et al., 2005) but expression or GFP reporters for cfz-2, lin-18 and cam-1 has not been reported (?). mom-5 and mig-1 transcripts are also upregulated (1.8×) in microarray profiles of unc-37 mutant VA motor neurons suggesting that the UNC-4 pathway negatively regulates mom-5 and mig-1 expression (Von Stetina et al., 2007b).

  • Supplemental Table S5 -

    Table S5. Compilation of tapping assay data. Percentages of Unc versus non-Unc animals in each genetic background tested are listed. n≥50 for each genotype tested.

  • Supplemental Table S6 -

    Table S6. Compilation of data of ceh-12::GFP expression in VA motor neurons. Percentages of VA motor neurons with ceh-12::GFP expression vs VAs with no ceh-12::GFP expression are listed. n≥10 for each VA scored; sum of pooled VA motor neurons scored is listed.

  • Supplemental Table S7 -

    Table S7. Percentage of VA motor neurons with ectopic AVB to VA UNC-7S::GFP positive gap junctions vs percentage of cells with no UNC-7S::GFP. n≥10 for each VA scored; sum of pooled VA motor neurons scored is listed. These values were used to construct pie charts in supplementary material Figure S8.

  • Supplemental Figure S1 -

    Fig. S1. Wnt components differentially regulate ecoptic ceh-12::GFP expression in unc-4 mutant VA motor neurons. Apparent effects of cwn-2 (red) on ectopic ceh-12::GFP expression are not statistically significant. cfz-2 (green) is required for ectopic ceh-12::GFP expression in VA9 and lin-18 (purple) promotes ectopic ceh-12::GFP expression in VA8 and VA9. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P< 0.0001 vs unc-4, Fisher’s Exact Test. n≥15 for each neuron.

  • Supplemental Figure S2 -

    Fig. S2. Components of the LIN-44-mediated pathway are not required for ceh-12::GFP expression in posterior VAs. Single and double mutants of lin-44 and cwn-1 and lin-17 do not significantly affect ectopic ceh-12::GFP expression in posterior VA motor neurons. Data from VA7-VA10 are pooled and the percentage of ceh-12::GFP positive and negative neurons is indicated. n≥15 for each neuron.

  • Supplemental Figure S3 -

    Fig. S3. Ectopic expression of EGL-20 is not sufficient to induce ceh-12 expression in WT VA motor neurons. (A) Confocal image of a wild-type (WT) worm expressing plim-4::EGL-20 and ceh-12::GFP. (B) Anterior ectopic EGL-20 expression (plim-4::EGL-20) does not result in ectopic ceh-12::GFP expression in a WT background (red). Anteriorly expressed EGL-20 results in ecoptic ceh-12::GFP expression in unc-4 mutant VAs throughout the length of the ventral nerve cord (black). n≥10 for each neuron.

  • Supplemental Figure S4 -

    Fig. S4. EGL-20/Wnt regulates the specificity of synaptic inputs to VA motor neurons. (A) RNAi of egl-20 in the hypormorphic unc-4(e2323) allele suppresses the Unc-4 backward movement defect. **P<0.01 vs unc-4, Fisher’s Exact Test, n=200. (B) Movement of ceh-12(gk391); unc-4(e2320); eri-1(mg366); lin-15b(n744) worms is not significantly different when treated with egl-20/Wnt RNAi compared with treatment with the empty vector control, n=200 (Winnier et al., 1999). (C) The deletion allele ceh-12(gk391) suppresses the Unc-4 backward movement defect of unc-4(e120) whereas the egl-20(hu120) null allele does not suppress unc-4(e120) and is partially epistatic to ceh-12(gk391). egl-20(hu120) alone does not show a backward movement defect (data not shown). Black brackets indicate significance of P<0.001 between connected pairs. N.S., not significant. n≥50. (D) Ectopic AVB gap junctions with VA7 and VA9 in unc-4(e120) are suppressed by egl-20(hu120). *P<0.05, **P<0.01. Taken together, these results indicate that EGL-20 may have separate threshold-dependent functions with competing outcomes: High levels of EGL-20 function are required for the creation of AVB to VA gap junctions and a minimum level of EGL-20 activity is necessary for the restoration of functional backward locomotory inputs to VAs in an unc-4 mutant. Hence, both hypomorphic and null alleles of egl-20 suppress the creation of ectopic AVB to VA gap junctions in unc-4 (see Fig. 6D) whereas Unc-4 suppression is conferred by hypomorphic egl-20 mutations (Fig. 3D, E; supplementary material Table S5) but not by the egl-20(hu120) null allele. n≥10 for each neuron.

  • Supplemental Figure S5 -

    Fig. S5. Mutations in Wnt receptors, cfz-2 and lin-18 do not affect Unc-4 movement. Movement of unc-4; lin-18 and unc-4; cfz-2 double mutants is not significantly different (P>0.05) from unc-4 single mutants. Fisher’s Exact Test. n≥50.

  • Supplemental Figure S6 -

    Fig. S6. RNAi of mom-5 in an unc-4 RNAi-sensitive strain suppresses the Unc-4 movement defect. Movement of unc-4(e2323); eri-1(mg366); lin-15b(n744) worms is significantly suppressed when treated with mom-5 RNAi compared with treatment with the empty vector control. ***P<0.0001 Fisher’s Exact Test. n≥50.

  • Supplemental Figure S7 -

    Fig. S7. Microarray analysis detects transcripts regulated by the unc-4 pathway in VA motor neurons. Microarray profiles of unc-37 mutant vs wildtype VA motor neurons were compared to detect differentially expressed transcripts (Von Stetina et al., 2007b). Fold change (x-axis) is plotted on a log2 scale against a significance score (y-axis). Thresholds for identifying transcripts with significantly different levels in unc-37 vs wildtype VAs were ≤5% FDR (false discovery rate) (horizontal dashed line) and fold change ≥ ±1.7× (vertical dashed lines). Blue diamonds correspond to transcripts downregulated in unc-37 mutant VAs and red diamonds represent transcripts that are upregulated in unc-37 vs. WT VA motor neurons. Gray diamonds represent transcripts with no significant fold change difference between unc-37 mutant and WT VAs. Enrichment in unc-37 VA motor neurons for selected genes ceh-12 (black diamond) (1.9×) and mig-1 (yellow diamond) (1.8×) and mom-5 (green diamond) (1.8×).

  • Supplemental Figure S8 -

    Fig. S8. Components of the LIN-17 pathway prevent the formation of VB-type inputs in VAs. (A) ‘Anterior’ VAs (VA2-6) show significantly more ectopic AVB to VA gap junctions in lin-17 and cwn-1 mutants vs WT. (B) No difference is detected in ectopic AVB to VA gap junctions in ‘posterior’ VAs (VA7-10). **P<0.01 *P<0.05, Fisher’s Exact Test vs WT. n≥10 for each neuron.

  • Supplemental Figure S9 -

    Fig. S9. LIN-44/Wnt antagonizes EGL-20-dependent expression of ceh-12::GFP in unc-4 mutant VA motor neurons. The double mutant lin-44; unc-4 has a similar effect on posterior ceh-12 expression as the unc-4 single mutant. EGL-20/Wnt is required for posterior ceh-12::GFP expression in unc-4 mutants. Ectopic ceh-12::GFP expression is partially restored in lin-44; unc-4; egl-20 triple mutants thereby demonstrating that lin-44 antagonizes ceh-12::GFP expression in posterior VAs. The occurrence of significantly more posterior ceh-12::GFP expression in lin-44; unc-4; egl-20 compared with unc-4; egl-20 also indicates that another pathway is promoting ceh-12 expression in these neurons in the absence of EGL-20/Wnt and LIN-44/Wnt activity. ***P< 0.001, Fisher’s Exact Test. Posterior VA motor neurons are grouped VA7-10. n≥15 for each neuron.

  • Supplemental Figure S10 -

    Fig. S10. BAR-1-catenin differentially affects movement in unc-37 and unc-4 mutants. (A,B) Mutation of bar-1 suppresses the Unc-37 backward movement defect (A) but not Unc-4 (P>0.05) (B). Movement was assessed with the tapping assay. n≥40. **P<0.01, Fisher’s Exact Test.

  • Supplemental Figure S11 -

    Fig. S11. The Wnt inhibitor pyrvinium suppresses unc-4(e2322ts) movement defect at 23°C. A tapping assay was performed to determine whether the canonical Wnt inhibitor pyrvinium was capable of suppressing the backword movement defect in a weak allele of unc-4. Pyrvinium showed a dose-dependent effect on suppression of Unc-4 movement. *P<0.05, **P≤0.001, ***P<0.0001, Fisher’s Exact Test. n≥100.