BertaniRogérioRevision, cladistic analysis and biogeography of Typhochlaena C. L. Koch, 1850, Pachistopelma Pocock, 1901 and Iridopelma Pocock, 1901 (Araneae, Theraphosidae, Aviculariinae) Zookeys23102012201223019410.3897/zookeys.230.3500 Pachistopelma http://species-id.net/wiki/Pachistopelma Pocock, 1901Figs 29–80PachistopelmaPocock 1901:548; Mello-Leitão 1923:336; Roewer 1942:256; Raven 1985:119; Platnick 2012.Pachystopelma: Simon 1903:959; Petrunkevitch 1911:82.Type species.

Pachistopelma rufonigrum Pocock, 1901, by original designation.

Diagnosis.

Male and female Pachistopelma differ from most other aviculariines, except Ephebopus, Tapinauchenius and Psalmopoeus by the straight to sligthly procurved first eye row (Fig. 37). Pachistopelma males differ from these genera by having a spinose spur on tibia I and females differ by having a dorso-ventrally flattened abdomen in combination with paired long spermathecae with a slight curvature medially and lacking constrictions or lobes. Additionally, males and females differ from these genera by both the absence of leg spines and the presence of urticating type II hair on the abdomen dorsum (except in mature females, that lack them).

Description.

Carapace longer than wide; cephalic region low (mainly in female) (Fig. 34). Cephalic and thoracic striae hardly distinct. Fovea shallow, straight. Chelicerae without rastellum. Eye tubercle low (mainly in female), wider than long (Fig. 36). Clypeus absent (Fig. 37). Anterior eye row straight in female, slightly procurved in male (Fig. 37). Labium wider than long, with 80–150 cuspules concentrated on anterior half. Maxillary lyra absent. Maxilla subrectangular, anterior lobe distinctly produced into conical process, inner angle bearing numerous cuspules (130–200). Sternum longer than wide. Posterior angle not separating coxae IV. Posterior sigilla submarginal, less than one diameter from margin. Leg formula: IV I II III. Clavate trichobothria on distal 2/3 of tarsi I–IV. STC of males and femalewithout teeth. Tarsi I–IV fully scopulated. Scopulae of tarsi and metatarsi I–II extended very laterally giving them a spatulate appearance. Femur IV without retrolateral scopula. Legs lacking spines. Posterior median spinneret with distal article digitiform (Fig. 39). Abdomen dorso-ventrally flattened in female (Figs 34–35). Stridulatory setae absent. Male spur on tibia I, consists of a low elevation with numerous spiniform setae on its tip (Fig. 33). Male palpal bulb globose narrowing abruptly forming long slender embolus, 3 times longer than tegulum length, with a curvature of roughly 45° to retrolateral side, keels absent, tegulum without prolateral depression (Figs 29–31). Two long, uniform, weakly sclerotized spermathecae with slight curvature in their middle (Fig. 32). Cymbium with a short spiniform process (Fig. 49). Type II of urticating hair on abdomen dorsum of immatures and males, absent in mature females.

Pachistopelma rufonigrum Pocock, 1901 29–32 male (MNRJ 06247), left palpal bulb 29 prolateral 30 retrolateral 31 frontal 32 male tibial spur of left leg I 33 female (MNRJ 06246) spermathecae. Scale bar = 1mm.

Pachistopelma rufonigrum Pocock, 1901, female (MNRJ 06246) 34 carapace and abdomen, lateral 35 abdomen, dorsal 36–37 eye tubercle 36 lateral 37 dorsal 38 labium and sternum 39 spinnerets, ventral. Scale bar = 1mm.

Pachistopelma rufonigrum Pocock, 1901, habitus 40–43 immatures in progression 44  female 45 male, all from E.E. Murici, Murici, state of Alagoas. Photos: R. Bertani. Scale bar = 10 mm.

Pachistopelma bromelicola sp. n. 46–50 male, holotype (MNRJ 06241) left palpal bulb 46 retrolateral, 47 prolateral, 48 frontal 49 male cymbium showing protuberance 50 male tibial spur of left leg I 51 female paratype (MNRJ 06242) spermathecae. Scale bar = 1mm.

Species included.

Pachistopelma rufonigrum Pocock, 1901 (Figs 29–45, 58–61, 67–68, 76–77), Pachistopelma bromelicola sp. n. (Figs 46–57, 62–68, 75, 78–80).

Pachistopelma bromelicola sp. n., habitus 52–55 immatures in progression 56 female 57 male, all from RPPN Sapiranga, Mata de São João, state of Bahia, except male, from Jeremoabo, state of Bahia. Photos: R. Bertani. Scale bar = 10 mm.

Variation in spermathecae. 58–60 Pachistopelma rufonigrum Pocock, 1901 58 Alhandra, state of Paraiba (MZSP 10839) 59 Mamanguape, state of Paraíba (IBSP 9756) 60 Igarassu, state of Pernambuco (MZSP 10862) 61–65 Pachistopelma bromelicola sp. n. 61 Nossa Senhora da Glória, state of Sergipe (IBSP ref 28482) 62–64 Santo Amaro das Brotas, state of Sergipe (MZSP 10847, 10847, 10846) 65 Maracás, state of Bahia (IBSP 7889). Scale bar = 1mm.

Female leg IV retrolateral view 66 Pachistopelma bromelicola sp. n. 67 Pachistopelma rufonigrum Pocock, 1901.

Distribution and habitat.

Northeastern Brazil, from the state of Rio Grande do Norte [6°22'S] to state of Bahia [13°25'S], mostly in the coastal region (Fig. 68). Both species of Pachistopelma inhabit tank bromeliads exclusively, e. g. Aechmea aquilega (Dias et al. 2000, Santos et al. 2004); Hohenbergia stellata, Hohenbergia ridley (Dias et al. 2000); Hohenbergia ramageana and Avicularia lingulata (Santos et al. 2004) (Figs 69–80) which can be found in very distinct habitats such as restinga (Figs 72–74), caatinga or even rainforest (Figs 69–71). In the last case, the spiders were in bromeliads that grow mainly on rocky outcrops exposed to direct and intense sunlight.

Figure 68. Map showing records of Pachistopelma species on Northeastern Brazil. Losangle = Pachistopelma rufonigrum, star = Pachistopelma bromelicola sp. n. The gray area represents the approximate original distribution of Brazilian Atlantic rainforest. White area represents open environments (cerrado and caatinga).

Pachistopelma spp. habitats 69–71 E. E. Murici, Murici, state of Alagoas 69 general view of a hill covered with Brazilian Atlantic rainforest and showing rocky formation on its tip, lower, yellowish area is a secondary grassland 70 same, viewed from its tip and showing bromeliads on the lower right of the photo 71 details of the rocky area with bromeliads intermixed with Brazilian Atlantic rainforest 72–74 Itabaiana National Park, Areia Branca, state of Sergipe, sandy areas resembling “restinga” vegetation with bromeliad “islands”. Photos: R. Bertani.

Pachistopelma spp. microhabitats 75, 79–80 Pachistopelma bromelicola sp. n. 75 Itabaiana National Park, Areia Branca, state of Sergipe 79–80 RPPN Sapiranga, São João da Mata, state of Bahia 79 closed retreat has a female with eggsac 80 same retreat opened 76–78 Pachistopelma rufonigrum Pocock, 1901, E. E. Murici, Murici, state of Alagoas. Photos: R. Bertani.

Color pattern ontogeny.

Pachistopelma juveniles possess a metallic green general pattern, and the dorsum of abdomen having a black longitudinal central stripe and five lateral black stripes that may connect with the central stripe. Adults are brownish to pinkish or blackish, without abdominal pattern (Figs 40–45, 52–57).

Remarks.

Pachistopelma concolor Caporiacco, 1947, lectotype (herein designated), immature male, Guyana, Campo di Marlissa, 31 December (MZUF 507); paralectotype, immature, Guyana, Campo I Demerara (MZUF 505), deposited in Museo Zoologico “La Specola”, Firenze, examined. Specimens have spines on apex of tibiae and metatarsi, lack urticating hair both on abdomen dorsum as well as on prolateral distal femur of palp, first ocular eye row is almost straight, and maxillary lyra is absent. This combination of characters is diagnostic for Tapinauchenius, and, therefore, Pachistopelma concolor Caporiacco, 1947 is transferred to Tapinauchenius concolor (Caporiacco, 1947) comb. n.

Key to species of <italic><tp:taxon-name>Pachistopelma</tp:taxon-name></italic>
1Metatarsus IV incrassate, with stiff setae (Fig. 66); general coloration dark (Fig. 56), male with longer setae on legs whitish and abdomen dorsum reddish (Fig. 57)Pachistopelma bromelicola sp. n.
Metatarsus IV not incrassate, with long and flexible reddish setae (Fig. 67); general coloration dark brown with pinkish setae (Figs 44–45)Pachistopelma rufonigrum
PocockRI (1901) Some new and old genera of South American Aviculariidae.Annals and Magazine of Natural History 7: 540-555. doi: 10.1080/03745480109443359Mello-LeitãoCF (1923) Theraphosoideas do Brasil.Revista do Museu Paulista 13: 1-438.RoewerCF (1942) Katalog der Araneae von 1758 bis 1940.Bremen, 1: 1-1040.RavenRJ (1985) The spider infraorder Mygalomorphae (Araneae): cladistics and systematics. Bulletin of American Museum of Natural History 182: 1–180. http://digitallibrary.amnh.org/dspace/handle/2246/955PlatnickNI (2012) The world spider catalog version 12.5. American Museum of Natural History. Available from: http://research.amnh.org/iz/spiders/catalog , doi: 10.5531/db.iz.0001 [accessed June 2012].SimonE. (1903) Histoire naturelle des araignées.Paris, Librarie Encyclopédique de Roret, 2: 669-1080.PetrunkevitchA (1911) A synonymic index-catalogue of spiders of North, Central and South America with all adjacent islands, Greenland, Bermuda, West Indies, Terra del Fuego, Galapagos, etc. Bulletin of American Museum of Natural History 29: 1–791. http://digitallibrary.amnh.org/dspace/handle/2246/1135doi: 10.5962/bhl.title.23819DiasSCBrescovitADSantosLTCoutoECG (2000) Aranhas em bromélias de duas restingas do estado de Sergipe, Brasil. Biologia Geral e Experimental 1: 22–24. http://www.biologiageralexperimental.bio.br/temas/aranhas/1.pdfSantosRLAlmeidaMGTinocoLDSMartinsLBMaiaMG (2004) Biogeography and conservation of the bromeliad tarantula Pachistopelma rufonigrum (Araneae, Theraphosidae) in Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.Journal of the Bromeliad Society 54: 153-157.