Prostate Cancer: Can Multiparametric MR Imaging Help Identify Patients Who Are Candidates for Active Surveillance?

© RSNA, 2013

 

 

Table E1. Sensitivity, Correct Classification Rate, and Overall Accuracy of D'Amico Scoring System in Stratification of AS and AT Candidates

table E1

Note.—Data are numbers of patients. Pearson χ2 = 18.991, P < .0001. The number (70%) in the bottom right-hand cell represents the overall accuracy of the scoring system.

 

Table E2. Sensitivity, PPV, and Overall Accuracy of Epstein Criteria in Stratification of AS and AT Candidates

table E2

Note.—Data are numbers of patients. Pearson χ2 = 29.703, P < .0001. The number (88%) in the bottom right-hand cell represents the overall accuracy of the scoring system.

 

Table E3. Sensitivity, PPV, and Overall Accuracy of CAPRA Scoring System in Stratification of AS and AT Candidates

tableE3

Note.—Data are numbers of patients. Pearson χ2 = 11.699, P = .001. The number (59%) in the bottom right-hand cell represents the overall accuracy of the scoring system.

 

Table E4. Sensitivity, PPV, and Overall Accuracy of Multiparametric MR Imaging Scoring System in Stratification of AS and AT Candidates

tableE4

Note.—Data are numbers of patients. Pearson χ2 = 62.466, P < .0001. The number (92%) in the bottom right-hand cell represents the overall accuracy of the scoring system.

 

Table E5. Results of Incorporation of Multiparametric MR Imaging Scoring System into D’Amico Scoring System

tableE5

Note.—Data are numbers of patients. As shown, incorporation of the multiparametric MR imaging scoring system into the D’Amico scoring system corrected treatment classification in 34 of 40 misclassified patients.

 

Table E6. Results of Incorporation of Multiparametric MR Imaging Scoring System into Epstein Criteria

tableE6

Note.—Data are numbers of patients. As shown, incorporation of the multiparametric MR imaging scoring system into the Epstein criteria corrected treatment classification in 12 of 16 misclassified patients.

 

Table E7. Results of Incorporation of Multiparametric MR Imaging Scoring System into CAPRA Scoring System

tableE7

Note.—Data are numbers of patients. As shown, incorporation of the multiparametric MR imaging scoring system into the CAPRA scoring system corrected treatment classification in 49 of 54 misclassified patients.